• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

White House Unveils Trump’s Opening Tax-Cut Bid

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
94,313
Reaction score
82,703
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
White House Unveils Trump’s Opening Tax-Cut Bid


By Sahil Kapur and Shannon Pettypiece
April 26, 2017

The White House made its opening bid for what officials called the “biggest tax cut” in U.S. history -- with cuts that would benefit businesses, the middle class and certain high-earning individuals -- but left unanswered questions about whether the plan would be paid for, or how. A list of goals for the tax overhaul calls for slashing the federal income-tax rate to 15 percent for corporations, small businesses and partnerships of all sizes. It also imposes a one-time tax on about $2.6 trillion in earnings that U.S. companies have parked overseas. The plan would end the taxation of corporations’ offshore income by moving to a territorial system, in which most foreign profits would be exempt from U.S. taxes. On the individual side, it proposes condensing the existing seven income-tax rates to just three, cutting the individual top rate to 35 percent from 39.6 percent. It would also end a 3.8 percent net investment income tax that applies only to individuals who earn more than $200,000 a year, repeal the alternative minimum tax and eliminate the estate tax.

At the same time, the plan would eliminate the federal income-tax deduction allowed for state and local taxes -- a provision that would hit high earners in high-tax states, including New York and New Jersey. The only itemized deductions that would be preserved under the plan would be for home mortgage interest and charitable contributions. It wasn’t immediately clear Wednesday whether the plan would pay for itself; Mnuchin and others have said it would stimulate enough economic growth to cover the cost of the tax cuts. Economists have called that proposition into question -- raising questions about whether any tax cuts it proposes would have to be temporary under congressional rules. The White House proposal didn’t specify whether a tax plan should be revenue-neutral -- if it isn’t, the cuts would expire within a decade. It didn’t take a position on revenue-raisers that House Republican leaders have proposed, including a border-adjusted tax on imports and domestic sales.
What the White House released was an abbreviated outline. It is understood that changes will be made by Congress and there is nothing of substance in the WH release explaining the mechanics of how lost tax revenues would be replaced.

Have at it.
 
I'm torn. The lefty in me fears what will have to be cut. On the other hand, the business owner in me just hears "ka-ching"!

;)
 
Wow, that second paragraph is a doozy for high-tax blue states.
 
This is the final nail in the coffin for misconception that Trump would be anything other than a typical Republican.
 
I'm torn. The lefty in me fears what will have to be cut. On the other hand, the business owner in me just hears "ka-ching"!

;)

Well, you could always take that tax windfall and invest it in philanthropic pursuits.
 
White House Unveils Trump’s Opening Tax-Cut Bid



What the White House released was an abbreviated outline. It is understood that changes will be made by Congress and there is nothing of substance in the WH release explaining the mechanics of how lost tax revenues would be replaced.

Have at it.

Trump is gonna sell Yellowstone National Park to recover from the YUGE tax breaks. Remember, with Trump everything is for sell. All public land will go on the auction block.
 
Well, you could always take that tax windfall and invest it in philanthropic pursuits.

If anyone wanted to do that, the current tax code allows them to use it as a deduction anyway. There is nothing in the current tax code that prevents you from donating to charity. In fact, it encourages it.
 
I'm torn. The lefty in me fears what will have to be cut. On the other hand, the business owner in me just hears "ka-ching"!

;)

Trump only hears "Ka-Ching!". So maybe when he's auctioning off public land (parks and all), maybe he'll do the same with the contents in 100's of military surplus storage buildings????
 
If anyone wanted to do that, the current tax code allows them to use it as a deduction anyway. There is nothing in the current tax code that prevents you from donating to charity. In fact, it encourages it.
Allows them to use what?
 
Trump is gonna sell Yellowstone National Park to recover from the YUGE tax breaks. Remember, with Trump everything is for sell. All public land will go on the auction block.

No he carried Wyoming, Yosemite is a possibility:mrgreen:
 
This is the biggest tax relief plan for low income earners in history. I hope like hell the Democrats fight it.
 
If anyone wanted to do that, the current tax code allows them to use it as a deduction anyway. There is nothing in the current tax code that prevents you from donating to charity. In fact, it encourages it.

There's nothing that prevents giving as much money to the government as they want, either. We never see the higher tax crowd opting to do so.
 
White House Unveils Trump’s Opening Tax-Cut Bid



What the White House released was an abbreviated outline. It is understood that changes will be made by Congress and there is nothing of substance in the WH release explaining the mechanics of how lost tax revenues would be replaced.

Have at it.


There isn't enough information there, really, for a full evaluation. I'd like to know the income cut-offs for the 3 brackets and the exemptions for corporate taxes.
 
Wonder what Trump could get for the original copies of the Declaration of Independence and Constitution?
Not much, the liberals don't value such things, and the conservatives would think it wrong to sell them!
 
If anyone wanted to do that, the current tax code allows them to use it as a deduction anyway. There is nothing in the current tax code that prevents you from donating to charity. In fact, it encourages it.

Of course, so no change. The only difference is that you would have a more direct and irrevocable say in how that money was used and for what cause.

Take the money and sign it over to Planned Parenthood, for all I care.
 
There doesn't seem to be a heck of a lot of detail in any of this so it's kind of difficult to comment but I'm glad to see and increase in the standard deduction. What I didn't see, however, was anything regarding refundable credits. If the standard deduction is raised and refundable credits such as the EIC and ACC remain as they are that's only going to increase the "benefit" of fraudulent filings.
 
There doesn't seem to be a heck of a lot of detail in any of this so it's kind of difficult to comment but I'm glad to see and increase in the standard deduction. What I didn't see, however, was anything regarding refundable credits. If the standard deduction is raised and refundable credits such as the EIC and ACC remain as they are that's only going to increase the "benefit" of fraudulent filings.

With a zero rate on the first 24 grand for married couples, I see the marriage sky rocketting.
 
Trump isn't a conservative...and everything is for sell to him.
but that was not the question, the question was how much he could get for them?
Sarcasm aside, I have no idea!
 
Your point?

The point is that in the end the money has to come from somewhere. If the state wants residents, you have to offer things Kansas can't come up with. They thought "lower taxes!" was all it took. Oops.
 
Last edited:
With a zero rate on the first 24 grand for married couples, I see the marriage sky rocketting.

Not necessarily. If you get a $12k deduction for being single and a $24k deduction as a couple then nothing really changes.
 
What needs to be gone first is the AMT, the marriage penalty, and the death tax.

Not surprisingly, those that don't pay federal taxes are pissed. Imagine that.
 
Back
Top Bottom