• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Bill O’Reilly Is Forced Out at Fox News

Perotista said:
Doesn't bother me one way or the other as I don't want watch partisan political talk shows. Fox, MSNBC or what have you. All are bad in my opinion for the nation. Not for so much what they espouse, but that so many Americans think they are actually getting the news instead of political propaganda that Joseph Goebbels would be proud of.

When one goes, another just comes in to take his place. For the better or worse, who knows. People watch Fox and its talk shows because they want to hear a conservative point of view on everything. Just like people watch MSNBC and CNN talks shows because they want to hear a liberal point of view on everything. Honesty and the truth has no place in these talk shows.

But the networks are free to air them, people are free to listen and watch them. Those who choose to watch them in my opinion don't need to political propaganda they dish out, they have already been brainwashed.
Click to expand...

Very good point, avoid editorials, they prevent free thinking.
 
Bill O'Racist may be gone, but there are plenty of Trumpanzees who still watch FOX News. They are the reason for Faux News Propaganda. All Bill O'Racist did was to carry their water.
 
Chomsky said:
Good.

First Ailes, then O'Reilly. Hannity would make it a perfect trifecta. Bonus points if Shep Smith brings the charges!
Click to expand...

Whoa hold on there, Shep can do much better than Hannity, hell I can do better than Hannity lol Us gays know what we can pull, Hannity would not even be on my radar ewww.
 
Perotista said:
Doesn't bother me one way or the other as I don't want watch partisan political talk shows. Fox, MSNBC or what have you. All are bad in my opinion for the nation. Not for so much what they espouse, but that so many Americans think they are actually getting the news instead of political propaganda that Joseph Goebbels would be proud of.

When one goes, another just comes in to take his place. For the better or worse, who knows. People watch Fox and its talk shows because they want to hear a conservative point of view on everything. Just like people watch MSNBC and CNN talks shows because they want to hear a liberal point of view on everything. Honesty and the truth has no place in these talk shows.

But the networks are free to air them, people are free to listen and watch them. Those who choose to watch them in my opinion don't need to political propaganda they dish out, they have already been brainwashed.
Click to expand...

No they haven't. FOX News and MSNBC ran out of eyedroppers.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
That would be a great idea but the Corporate Class Propagandizers wont pay the bills, so who would fund it?
Click to expand...
Good point.

They'd have to have Trump and other like minded seed it, and roll-out a smaller start-up along the lines of Brietbart's current stature on the internet.

But you're right; that's not a world class network. But it could be a start.
 
Perotista said:
Doesn't bother me one way or the other as I don't want watch partisan political talk shows. Fox, MSNBC or what have you. All are bad in my opinion for the nation. Not for so much what they espouse, but that so many Americans think they are actually getting the news instead of political propaganda that Joseph Goebbels would be proud of.
Click to expand...
No one has the Goebbelsian 'Big Lie' covered like Trump>Spicer. No Network. No one.
ie, in 30 dizzying seconds, Mr Birther tried to erase 5 years... and blamed it on... Hillary!
No apology, no nothing.

And Trumpov is just a manifestation/Third Molesting Pillar of the group - on tape. He could not have been elected with Fox.


Perotsista said:
When one goes, another just comes in to take his place. For the better or worse, who knows. People watch Fox and its talk shows because they want to hear a conservative point of view on everything. Just like people watch MSNBC and CNN talks shows because they want to hear a liberal point of view on everything. Honesty and the truth has no place in these talk shows...
Click to expand...
Lumping CNN in with MSNBC and Fox just shows your politics.
CNN leans a bit liberal, but Nothing like the other two Infomercials.
 
Last edited:
yankintx said:
Whoa hold on there, Shep can do much better than Hannity, hell I can do better than Hannity lol Us gays know what we can pull, Hannity would not even be on my radar ewww.
Click to expand...
I was shooting for metaphorical satire here ...

(but it wasn't about what Shep "could do", but what other's foster upon him - harrasment)
 
Perotista said:
Doesn't bother me one way or the other as I don't want watch partisan political talk shows. Fox, MSNBC or what have you. All are bad in my opinion for the nation. Not for so much what they espouse, but that so many Americans think they are actually getting the news instead of political propaganda that Joseph Goebbels would be proud of.

When one goes, another just comes in to take his place. For the better or worse, who knows. People watch Fox and its talk shows because they want to hear a conservative point of view on everything. Just like people watch MSNBC and CNN talks shows because they want to hear a liberal point of view on everything. Honesty and the truth has no place in these talk shows.

But the networks are free to air them, people are free to listen and watch them. Those who choose to watch them in my opinion don't need to political propaganda they dish out, they have already been brainwashed.
Click to expand...
Putting CNN as partisan would seem to be indicative of your POV.
 
Putting CNN as non-partisan doesn't seem, it is, indicative of ones POV.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Chomsky said:
Putting CNN as partisan would seem to be indicative of your POV.
Click to expand...

I never seem to end up on CNN. Wolf Blitzer is unwatchable. All I can stand of the others is about five minutes. I will watch Sheperd Smith. Rachel Maddow could finish her schtick in about five minutes!
 
Chomsky said:
My gut says Dana Perino will get temporary fill-in.

Watters is hopeless. Baer is too important as anchor. Hannity has his show. And Carlson just doesn't strike me as really the right stuff - though he's in similar vein - so I'll give him a possibility and put him as first runner-up.
Click to expand...

From what I've seen of Carlson, he's got the best show on TV (not that I watch much). He brings Libs on and skins them alive on every show I've seen. It's hilarious watching them lose their minds, embarrass themselves and reveal their intellectually bankrupt ideology. It seems to be a regular feature... and if so, I'm surprised Libs haven't boycotted his show, as they make utter fools of themselves.

As for O'Reilly... it will be interesting. He's not been convicted, and the woman could end up paying a price in a court of law... so they better be right.

From what I read, calling a chick Hot Chocolate doesn't smack of "harassment", but hey... Libs have changed their stripes so many times, you don't know what they stand for. I'm certain had Bill Clinton called a babe Hot Chocolate, and it was used as a claim of "sexual harassment" it'd be laughed at.
 
Last edited:
Rexedgar said:
I never seem to end up on CNN. Wolf Blitzer is unwatchable. All I can stand of the others is about five minutes. I will watch Sheperd Smith. Rachel Maddow could finish her schtick in about five minutes!
Click to expand...
I will agree with you about Blitzer.

But I'm starting to garner more respect for Don Lemon.
 
zimmer said:
From what I've seen of Carlson, he's got the best show on TV (not that I watch much). He brings Libs on and skins them alive on every show. It's hilarious watching them lose their minds and embarrass themselves and reveal their intellectually bankrupt ideology. It's a regular feature... and I'm surprised Libs haven't boycotted his show, as they make utter fools of themselves.

As for O'Reilly... it will be interesting. He's not been convicted, and they could end up paying a price in a court of law... so they better be right.

From what I read, calling a chick Hot Chocolate doesn't smack of "harassment", but hey... Libs have changed their stripes so many times, you don't know what they stand for. I'm certain had Bill Clinton called a babe Hot Chocolate, and it used as a claim of "sexual harassment" it'd be laughed at.
Click to expand...
One guy I did forget about was Neil Cavuto. Actually, maybe even Lou Dobbs. Both from Fox Financial.
 
danarhea said:
Bill O'Racist may be gone, but there are plenty of Trumpanzees who still watch FOX News. They are the reason for Faux News Propaganda. All Bill O'Racist did was to carry their water.
Click to expand...

why you calling him a racist? o_O you know something I don't know?
 
They could have gotten Billy Bush at a low up front cost.
 
Maybe Fox will get that smart cute chick Glenn Beck does not want anymore, work her in. This is a good time to go get fresh faces and fresh voices anyways, there is no way this should be bad for FOX.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
zimmer said:
From what I've seen of Carlson, he's got the best show on TV (not that I watch much). He brings Libs on and skins them alive on every show I've seen. It's hilarious watching them lose their minds, embarrass themselves and reveal their intellectually bankrupt ideology. It seems to be a regular feature... and if so, I'm surprised Libs haven't boycotted his show, as they make utter fools of themselves.

As for O'Reilly... it will be interesting. He's not been convicted, and the woman could end up paying a price in a court of law... so they better be right.

From what I read, calling a chick Hot Chocolate doesn't smack of "harassment", but hey... Libs have changed their stripes so many times, you don't know what they stand for. I'm certain had Bill Clinton called a babe Hot Chocolate, and it was used as a claim of "sexual harassment" it'd be laughed at.
Click to expand...

We have lost a lot of freedom in that 20 years.
 
mbig said:
Those are might weak replacements.
They're going to have to bring someone in from the outside with more Gravitas for conservatives: a Limbaugh etc.
Click to expand...
Yep, looks like Hannity's now Mr. Big.

You are right though, in that Limbaugh would be an amazing fit for both he and Fox. He's the one guy that could supersede Bill O. Everyone else at Fox, besides Hannity, is an extremely distant underling shadow.
 
Chomsky said:
Yep, looks like Hannity's now Mr. Big.

You are right though, in that Limbaugh would be an amazing fit for both he and Fox. He's the one guy that could supersede Bill O. Everyone else at Fox besides Hannity is an extremely distant underling.
Click to expand...

Rush work for someone again? Replace one old white guy with another old white guy?

Fox can do better, much better.
 
mbig said:
Those are might weak replacements/shifts.
They're going to have to bring someone in from the outside with more Gravitas for conservatives: a Limbaugh etc.
In the meantime, Hannity is left as 'the man.'

Megan and Gretta had already left due to the Fox Piggies.
Click to expand...

Somehow, when I think of Limbaugh, "gravitas" never occurs to me.

I hardly ever watch it--I'm really not much of a TV watcher--but I like "The Five's" format and personnel.

Yes, Hannity is now the top dog. So? I don't watch him and will bet you don't either.
 
mbig said:
Those are might weak replacements/shifts.
They're going to have to bring someone in from the outside with more Gravitas for conservatives: a Limbaugh etc.
In the meantime, Hannity is left as 'the man.'

Megan and Gretta had already left due to the Fox Piggies.
Click to expand...

The Left are such easy marks, and the truth is desperately underserved at the other networks, all they need to do is fill the slots with a cigar... I mean fill the slots with people who are halfway engaging and honest.

FOXNEWS will be just fine... it will dominate as it always has, so long as they keep reporting the entire story, and both sides of the story... something the others haven't done for decades, and don't do today.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
Maybe Fox with get that smart cute chick Glenn Beck does not want anymore, work her in. This is a good time to go get fresh faces and fresh voices anyways, there is no way this should be bad for FOX.
Click to expand...

Eric Bolling is on deck.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom