• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Susan Rice Did Nothing Wrong, Say Both Dems and Republicans

lurchadams said:
Susan Rice Did Nothing Wrong, Say Both Dems and Republicans - NBC News



Too bad for Trump and the and the Obama haters. They've been calling for Rice's and Obama's head for weeks. Sorry, suckers... no blood for you!
Click to expand...

we know this is not true, because on mar 22 2017, Rice openly denied knowing of any surveillance on the trump organization

Remember when Susan Rice said she knew nothing of the Trump 'unmasking'?

Former national security adviser Susan Rice said last month she knew nothing about reports that the intelligence community incidentally collected information on Donald Trump's transition team following the Nov. 8 election.

On Monday, however, Bloomberg reported that Rice personally requested that the identities of "masked" Americans in U.S. intelligence reports linked to President Trump's transition team and campaign be "unmasked."


 
Last edited:
NIMBY said:
Rice was exonerated; on to the next lie from trump .
Click to expand...

No she was not. I saw both interviews and she flat out lied! But the democrats act like.... Move along nothing to see here! :cool:
Then they scream Russia!
 
j-mac said:
Oh, by all means, post it....I'll wait....
Click to expand...

How the hell can I if they never revealed their name? You made a solid claim that you've never met one that wouldn't reveal their name. Just pointing out that that is a silly, stupid, absolutely unprovable comment to make.
 
j-mac said:
Well, we are going to have to wait and see won't we...? But I do know this, no BS made up bird cage liner of a story is going to make me think that what she had a part in as a former member of a corrupt administration that worked in its closing days to undermine an incoming administration is off the hook in any way....They are trash...We are better if they would just fade into obscurity....
Click to expand...

Academy_Award_trophy.jpg
 
Common Sense 1 said:
No she was not. I saw both interviews and she flat out lied! But the democrats act like.... Move along nothing to see here! :cool:
Then they scream Russia!
Click to expand...

Do show the lie--and then zoom back to Russia--which you can't wish to go away .
 
apdst said:
If she did nothing wrong, why did she lie about doing it?
Click to expand...

Prove the lie.

In other news, dies a lie mean she did something wrong, apdst ?
 
Common Sense 1 said:
Rice can't even get her story straight... First she knew nothing about the unmasking and then she said oh I knew all about it but it was legal. The women is a pathological liar and everyone knows that is a fact.
Click to expand...

Share the link where Rice said she knew nothing about the unmasking. Thanks.
 
apdst said:
By that logic, Nixon did nothing wrong, too. :lamo
Click to expand...

There's my buddy again! Do you have evidence that Rice is guilty of something? Please share.
 
chuckiechan said:
I have more faith in Jeff Sessions than the idiots at NBC. "Those who say don't know, and those who know, don't say". So we are just going to have to wait it out. Everyone else is just pushing theories.
Click to expand...

sessions is the worst thing to hit this Nation politically since the Civil War .
 


NIMBY said:
Prove the lie.

In other news, dies a lie mean she did something wrong, apdst ?
Click to expand...
Former national security adviser Susan Rice said last month she knew nothing about reports that the intelligence community incidentally collected information on Donald Trump's transition team following the Nov. 8 election.

On Monday, however, Bloomberg reported that Rice personally requested that the identities of "masked" Americans in U.S. intelligence reports linked to President Trump's transition team and campaign be "unmasked."
 
Master PO said:
we know this is not true, because on mar 22 2017, Rice openly denied knowing of any surveillance on the trump organization

Remember when Susan Rice said she knew nothing of the Trump 'unmasking'?

Former national security adviser Susan Rice said last month she knew nothing about reports that the intelligence community incidentally collected information on Donald Trump's transition team following the Nov. 8 election.

On Monday, however, Bloomberg reported that Rice personally requested that the identities of "masked" Americans in U.S. intelligence reports linked to President Trump's transition team and campaign be "unmasked."


Click to expand...


Yep, you're right. If she's the one who requested the unmasking, she's lying. So what's going to happen now? It's a republican house and senate. Will she be convicted of something?
 
chuckiechan said:
I have more faith in Jeff Sessions than the idiots at NBC. "Those who say don't know, and those who know, don't say". So we are just going to have to wait it out. Everyone else is just pushing theories.
Click to expand...

Sessions is a liar as well. He lied to the senate and then had to recuse himself from the Trump team/Russian investigation. I'm not sure where your confidence in him is coming from, but go crazy.
 
NIMBY said:
sessions is the worst thing to hit this Nation politically since the Civil War .
Click to expand...

Yeah he's actually going to uphold our laws. Unlike Holder that sent a couple thousand guns to the Mexican cartels and lost them all. How stupid. Then one of the guns kill one of our border agents. Then lynch calls Bubba over to her plane to talk shop to get Hillary off.
 
lurchadams said:
Yep, you're right. If she's the one who requested the unmasking, she's lying. So what's going to happen now? It's a republican house and senate. Will she be convicted of something?
Click to expand...

On the off chance you're not being sarcastic, the question didn't use the word unmasking, but disclosing. I.E. leaking the names subsequent to the unmasking. Since the leak would be illegal, that would be the most obvious ramification of any scandal and therefore what she was responding to. Republicans know this which is why they always use a heavily edited version of the interview and are always sure to "summarize" the question asked of her by using the word "unmasking."
 
lurchadams said:
Yep, you're right. If she's the one who requested the unmasking, she's lying. So what's going to happen now? It's a republican house and senate. Will she be convicted of something?
Click to expand...

well glad it didn't take long to convince you she lied but i don't think she or anyone else that high up will ever see the inside of a jail.
 
j-mac said:
Hmmmm....Not following the conversation? I have already stated that I don't know if she broke a law or not...Please do keep up...
Click to expand...

You are arguing that reports of unnamed republicans saying that Rice did nothing wrong should not be believed. In order to maintain your ridiculous position, you have to ignore the fact that none of the people who have seen the reports have said that Rice did do something wrong.

The only reason to believe that Rice may have done something wrong is to think it is possible that some of the republican read the reports, saw wrongdoing, and are saying nothing about it which is absolutely ridiculous.

And yet, here you are, clinging to this ridiculous possibility and trying to pretend you are taking a neutral and reasonable position when your position requires the belief in a possibility that is unrealistic, unreasonable and hackishly partisan
 
Last edited:
Cardinal said:
On the off chance you're not being sarcastic, the question didn't use the word unmasking, but disclosing. I.E. leaking the names subsequent to the unmasking. Since the leak would be illegal, that would be the most obvious ramification of any scandal and therefore what she was responding to. Republicans know this which is why they always use a heavily edited version of the interview and are always sure to "summarize" the question asked of her by using the word "unmasking."
Click to expand...

I wasn't being sarcastic. Thanks.
 
Master PO said:
well glad it didn't take long to convince you she lied but i don't think she or anyone else that high up will ever see the inside of a jail.
Click to expand...

Do you think the committees will subpoena her or request she testify?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom