- Joined
- Oct 21, 2015
- Messages
- 53,813
- Reaction score
- 10,864
- Location
- Kentucky
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
As you confused yourself between the meaning of “accurate” and “reflective” in your own word usage, you don’t understand that from the same population there can be more than one “many”. For instance, saying “Many Trump supporters are still birthers” does necessarily mean to say there is a majority of Trump supporters that are birthers. Just like saying “She had many lonely nights” does not mean the “she” in question had a majority of her nights being lonely.
It’d be great if you could give me an example of an idiocy on the left. Not that I doubt of their existence, but that sweeping generalizations and blanket statements without giving a specific example and with some data to support the significance of that occurrence give nothing substantive to debate. Only claims that only visceral and emotional without any supporting fact that can be reasonably debated.
What have I said that makes you think I “…see one side of the street.”? It’s not my job to defend your “side” or make your case. I will admit to facts you present and points you make to which I can agree after substantiation. It’s up to you to show me the light of facts, reason and rational thought that I may “see” your claims and point you try to make.
The “many birthers” included “…and are the majority of the belief that Obama was a Muslim born out of this country?” I would appreciate your clarity as to your “No” answer applies to those two Y and/or N parts of the same question. Because, the majority of Trumpers do believe so.
I already gave you some. Let's just start with Trump colluded with the Russians to influence the election.