• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

CIA Director Pompeo Denounces WikiLeaks As 'Hostile Intelligence Service'

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
94,166
Reaction score
82,436
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
CIA Director Pompeo Denounces WikiLeaks As 'Hostile Intelligence Service'


By RICHARD GONZALES
April 13, 2017

ap_17103727968359-74f38e55e9fa18058c171b26ab1e6bf00e5b2361-s400-c85.jpg

CIA Director Michael Pompeo. Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP

Mike Pompeo, director of the Central Intelligence Agency, slammed WikiLeaks and its founder Julian Assange in a full-throated public denunciation Thursday before an audience for foreign policy specialists in Washington, D.C. "WikiLeaks walks like a hostile intelligence service and talks like a hostile intelligence service," he said in prepared remarks at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "Assange is a narcissist who has created nothing of value," Pompeo said. "He relies on the dirty work of other to make himself famous. He is a fraud — a coward hiding behind a screen. "And in Kansas, we know something about false Wizards," said the former Kansas congressman in his first public remarks as CIA director. Pompeo accused "Assange and his ilk" of making common cause with dictators as "they try unsuccessfully to cloak themselves and their actions in the language of liberty and privacy."

The CIA director said the U.S. intelligence community determined that Russian military intelligence used WikiLeaks to release information obtained through cyber operations against the Democratic National Committee. He also described the Russian state-owned television network, RT, as that country's "primary propaganda outlet" and said it actively collaborated with WikiLeaks. Pompeo said "there is no quick fix" to the challenge posed by WikiLeaks and other "hostile non-state intelligence agencies," adding that addressing the problem would be a long-term project. "We can never truly eliminate the threat but we can mitigate and manage it," he said.
This is the same Mike Pompeo who was sharing Wikileaks documents on his Congressional Twitter account less than a year ago. Funny how that hypocrisy thingy works.
 
He sounds jealous that Wikileaks might have better info than him.
 
CIA Director Pompeo Denounces WikiLeaks As 'Hostile Intelligence Service'



This is the same Mike Pompeo who was sharing Wikileaks documents on his Congressional Twitter account less than a year ago. Funny how that hypocrisy thingy works.

Well, I can't speak for Pompeo, but it is very safe to say that Wikileaks has historically had a severely biased publication mix against US interests and always given its publications spin obviously calculated to do the US maximum harm. So yes. I think it safe to say that the organization is as much part of the enemy as rt or more so. It regularly uses illegally acquired information. This is not to say we should treat them as military combatants or terrorists. But it would be negligent to leave them unmonitored.
 
Well, I can't speak for Pompeo, but it is very safe to say that Wikileaks has historically had a severely biased publication mix against US interests and always given its publications spin obviously calculated to do the US maximum harm. So yes. I think it safe to say that the organization is as much part of the enemy as rt or more so. It regularly uses illegally acquired information. This is not to say we should treat them as military combatants or terrorists. But it would be negligent to leave them unmonitored.

I think what actually happened is that the Russians timed the leaks for maximum effect and Wikileaks just passed them through as they were received. I very much doubt Julian was responsible for the timing other than to publish as soon as the info was delivered, or not long after.

For example, the bombshells didn't really begin to drop until after the Dem nomination was settled and Hillary was locked in despite the fact that it's almost certain they had all this damaging information during most of the primaries; it's likely the Russians wanted her as the nominee both because she had less of a chance than Bernie vs their boy, and because she was a much easier target with more baggage/closet skeletons to exploit (beyond that, I can't see Julian having enmity towards Bernie; to the contrary he seems to like the Senator, while he despises Clinton).
 
Last edited:
I think what actually happened is that the Russians timed the leaks for maximum effect and Wikileaks just passed them through as they were received. I very much doubt Julian was responsible for the timing other than to publish as soon as the info was delivered, or not long after.

For example, the bombshells didn't really begin to drop until after the Dem nomination was settled and Hillary was locked in despite the fact that it's almost certain they had all this damaging information during most of the primaries; it's likely the Russians wanted her as the nominee both because she had less of a chance than Bernie vs their boy, and because she was a much easier target with more baggage/closet skeletons to exploit (beyond that, I can't see Julian having enmity towards Bernie; to the contrary he seems to like the Senator, while he despises Clinton).

You are acting like Assange had any control over the timing of the leaks. He was just following orders from his boss, Putin. I also now appears that the Trump campaign was involved in the "coordinating" as Comey put it. Assange is locked up in a embassy with no where to go but down, the idea that he has any control of Wiki is laughable. Putin hated Hillary and that is the reason she was targeted.
 
You are acting like Assange had any control over the timing of the leaks. He was just following orders from his boss, Putin. I also now appears that the Trump campaign was involved in the "coordinating" as Comey put it. Assange is locked up in a embassy with no where to go but down, the idea that he has any control of Wiki is laughable. Putin hated Hillary and that is the reason she was targeted.

Do you have any evidence that Putin or his agents were specifically mandating and dictating release timing to Assange rather than him just passing things through as they were received?

Beyond that, I think your assignment of motive is incomplete; it's not just that Putin disliked Hillary, but also that he thought that Trump would be more amenable/pliable to his interests (the details of this relationship being still under investigation), so he wanted him in (particularly given assertions the Russians helped Trump in the GOP primaries: Russians took Trump?s side in GOP primary, too, expert tells Senate panel | McClatchy Washington Bureau ).
 
Last edited:
Do you have any evidence that Putin or his agents were specifically mandating and dictating release timing to Assange rather than him just passing things through as they were received?



Beyond that, I think your assignment of motive is incomplete; it's not just that Putin disliked Hillary, but also that he thought that Trump would be more amenable/pliable to his interests (the details of this relationship being still under investigation), so he wanted him in (particularly given assertions the Russians helped Trump in the GOP primaries: Russians took Trump?s side in GOP primary, too, expert tells Senate panel | McClatchy Washington Bureau ).

That is what Pompeo asserted by calling Wikileaks a "hostile intelligence service" IMO. In fact it the releases may very well have been timed with consultation with Trump campaign associates. The FBI is investigating that now.
As far as Putin's motives, you are forgetting that Trump associates have been in contact with Russian agents since 2015. I would not rule out that Putin picked his candidate even before the primaries began. Hell, he could have been the reason Trump decided to run. Trump is not someone who likes to lose and having Putin's help might have swayed him. Morals are not "***** grabbing" Trumps strong suit to say the least.
 
Last edited:
As far as Putin's motives, you are forgetting that Trump associates have been in contact with Russian agents since 2015. I would not rule out that Putin picked his candidate even before the primaries began. Hell, he could have been the reason Trump decided to run. Trump is not someone who likes to lose and having Putin's help might have swayed him. Morals are not Trumps strong suit to say the least.

Not at all. I'm very aware that the contacts predated the primary, which only reinforces my point that it wasn't about Clinton losing so much as Trump winning. Part of that is supporting Trump in the primaries; the other is deferring timing of the releases until after the Dem nom was settled and the weaker, more exploitable candidate put forward. If it were merely about Clinton losing, many of the Russian bombshells would have probably been put through sooner to strangle Hillary in the primaries.
 
Donald Trump - 10 October 2016 said:
"I love WikiLeaks!"

Apparently we now have yet another Trump flip-flop.
 
That is what Pompeo asserted by calling Wikileaks a "hostile intelligence service" IMO. In fact it the releases may very well have been timed with consultation with Trump campaign associates. The FBI is investigating that now.

Since this edit was made after my response: Pompeo made no such assertion; he did not actually say that they were taking such directions, or that such a relationship existed, nor did he present evidence to that effect. I'm certainly willing to entertain the idea that they were suborned by the Kremlin, at least in the capacity of the campaign leaks, but I'd like to see some actual proof.
 
Since this edit was made after my response: Pompeo made no such assertion; he did not actually say that they were taking such directions, or that such a relationship existed, nor did he present evidence to that effect. I'm certainly willing to entertain the idea that they were suborned by the Kremlin, at least in the capacity of the campaign leaks, but I'd like to see some actual proof.

He certainly implied that wikileaks was operating under the command of Russian intelligence. Since they are the source of the leaks why wouldn't they have control of the timing of their release? What control does Assange have stuck in that embassy?
 
He certainly implied that wikileaks was operating under the command of Russian intelligence. Since they are the source of the leaks why wouldn't they have control of the timing of their release? What control does Assange have stuck in that embassy?

Yes, they have control over the timing of the leaks... but there's a very significant difference between Russian intelligence timing disclosure to Wikileaks which then immediately passes them through, and specifically dictating the timetable of their document releases.

There has been exactly zero evidence provided for the latter. Why would Putin/Russian intelligence even risk that sort of imposition being discovered (thereby totally delegitimizing Wikileaks for good reason, and robbing it of power), so long as they knew that Wikileaks could be trusted to pass through documentation?
 
Yes, they have control over the timing of the leaks... but there's a very significant difference between Russian intelligence timing disclosure to Wikileaks which then immediately passes them through, and specifically dictating the timetable of their document releases.

There has been exactly zero evidence provided for the latter. Why would Putin/Russian intelligence even risk that sort of imposition being discovered (thereby totally delegitimizing Wikileaks for good reason, and robbing it of power), so long as they knew that Wikileaks could be trusted to pass through documentation?

For the same reason they "risked" putting their fingers on the scale for Trump. They simply deny it all and claim the evidence is false. Similar to some of the posters on this board...
 
I think what actually happened is that the Russians timed the leaks for maximum effect and Wikileaks just passed them through as they were received. I very much doubt Julian was responsible for the timing other than to publish as soon as the info was delivered, or not long after.

For example, the bombshells didn't really begin to drop until after the Dem nomination was settled and Hillary was locked in despite the fact that it's almost certain they had all this damaging information during most of the primaries; it's likely the Russians wanted her as the nominee both because she had less of a chance than Bernie vs their boy, and because she was a much easier target with more baggage/closet skeletons to exploit (beyond that, I can't see Julian having enmity towards Bernie; to the contrary he seems to like the Senator, while he despises Clinton).
Wrong again. Wikileaks dropped a slew of bombshells including the fact that the DNC was working with the MSM to sabotage Bernie Sander's campaign. They deliberately released a lot of damaging info on Hillary before the DNC convention to hurt her chances at winning. The DNC pushed her through even though they knew she was a severely compromised candidate. The leaks before the convention were specifically aimed at stopping her from getting the nomination.
 
Apparently we now have yet another Trump flip-flop.

The comments come from Pompeo, not Trump. Trump is not labeling wikileaks as some sort of nefarious agency. You do know that Trump and Pompeo are different people right? Because you seem confused.
 
Pompeo is right. Wikileaks has leaked U.S. government secrets for no other reason than to harm The United States. There are no telling how many lives have been lost because of the exposure of this information.

Massive pressure should be applied to Ecuador to force them to drop Assange's ass off at the airport and handed over to CIA agents. He should be taken to an undisclosed locatiom and be forced to tell everything he knows.
 
Well, I can't speak for Pompeo, but it is very safe to say that Wikileaks has historically had a severely biased publication mix against US interests and always given its publications spin obviously calculated to do the US maximum harm. So yes. I think it safe to say that the organization is as much part of the enemy as rt or more so. It regularly uses illegally acquired information. This is not to say we should treat them as military combatants or terrorists. But it would be negligent to leave them unmonitored.

Wait...you consider RT a threat or an enemy? They are merely reporting news with their own bias. No different than the BBC or MSNBC or FOX.
 
For the same reason they "risked" putting their fingers on the scale for Trump. They simply deny it all and claim the evidence is false. Similar to some of the posters on this board...

The problem with this theory is it's all risk, no, or at best little reward. If you know that Wikileaks will reliably pass through, you don't need to dictate the schedule; you simply release information to them as desired.

Wrong again. Wikileaks dropped a slew of bombshells including the fact that the DNC was working with the MSM to sabotage Bernie Sander's campaign. They deliberately released a lot of damaging info on Hillary before the DNC convention to hurt her chances at winning. The DNC pushed her through even though they knew she was a severely compromised candidate. The leaks before the convention were specifically aimed at stopping her from getting the nomination.

The really damaging stuff wasn't really dropped until after the nomination was largely settled. Bernie didn't get any substantial support at the formative stages of the election where it would have actually helped him.
 
The comments come from Pompeo, not Trump. Trump is not labeling wikileaks as some sort of nefarious agency. You do know that Trump and Pompeo are different people right? Because you seem confused.

You do know that Pompeo works for trump, correct?

Where does the buck stop with trump, besides his back pocket ?
 
You do know that Pompeo works for trump, correct?

Where does the buck stop with trump, besides his back pocket ?

So Trump is expected to micro-manage all his employees and literally explain to them beforehand the words that they should speak? Trump is not the authoritarian that Obama and Hillary were. People who work for Trump are given leeway to say just about anything. That's why Trump was ok with what Cruz said during the RNC convention and that's why he has a DEMOCRAT working for him in the White HOuse.
 
You do know that Pompeo works for trump, correct?

Where does the buck stop with trump, besides his back pocket ?

Van Jones, a communist, worked for Obama. Were you ok with that?
 
Back
Top Bottom