• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Reports in unmasking controversy were detailed, had info about 'everyday lives'

Erod

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
15,483
Reaction score
8,227
Location
North Texas
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
Reports in unmasking controversy were detailed, had info about 'everyday lives' | Fox News

The intelligence reports at the center of the Susan Rice unmasking controversy were detailed, and almost resembled a private investigator’s file, according to a Republican congressman familiar with the documents.

"This is information about their everyday lives," Rep. Peter King of New York, a member of the House Intelligence committee said. "Sort of like in a divorce case where lawyers are hired, investigators are hired just to find out what the other person is doing from morning until night and then you try to piece it together later on.”

Nothing accidental or peripheral about that. Rice lied.
 
Nothing accidental or peripheral about that. Rice lied.

So is lying back to being bad now? I thought you guys excused it if it was Trump lying? So hard to keep up with conservative talking points.
 
:doh UNMAKING IS NOT A CRIME OR CONTROVERSIAL ... it's just Drama for Drama Queens :roll:
 
:doh UNMAKING IS NOT A CRIME OR CONTROVERSIAL ... it's just Drama for Drama Queens :roll:

:golfOBVIOUSLY IT IS CONTROVERSIAL SINCE THERE IS A CONTROVERSY ABOUT IT... :notlook:
 
Nothing accidental or peripheral about that. Rice lied.
Lol. You certainly have no problem if Trump lies. But reverse that and ... OMG! A LIE!

Ethical bankruptcy 24/7.
 
I'll make a bet with you ...

I Bet someone from the Trump Administration gets an Indictment before anyone from the Obama Administration :mrgreen:

Deal?
 
Lol. You certainly have no problem if Trump lies. But reverse that and ... OMG! A LIE!

Ethical bankruptcy 24/7.

How do you know he has no problem? Have you read and listened to every opinion hes ever had?
 
I'll make a bet with you ...

I Bet someone from the Trump Administration gets an Indictment before anyone from the Obama Administration :mrgreen:

Deal?

No, moral relativism is meaningless.
 
:doh UNMAKING IS NOT A CRIME OR CONTROVERSIAL ... it's just Drama for Drama Queens :roll:

For your edification:

Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
 
So is lying back to being bad now? I thought you guys excused it if it was Trump lying? So hard to keep up with conservative talking points.
Leaking classified information is also good now. Didn't you get the memo? :mrgreen:
 
Leaking classified information is also good now. Didn't you get the memo? :mrgreen:

What has been leaked?

The only leaks regarding the "unmasking" have come from the white house to Nunes and then Nunes to the press.
 
Only for Bed Wetters :lamo

So...you are equating people who believe something is controversial with people with bladder dysfunction.

Okaaaaay.

What's next? You equate nervousness with brain disorders? Compassion with stomach cancer?

What a waste of time you are.

And save the response, I don't read responses from the likes of you.
 
What has been leaked?

The only leaks regarding the "unmasking" have come from the white house to Nunes and then Nunes to the press.

Flynn's identity was unmasked. That wasn't illegal. Leaking Flynn's name to uncleared personnel was illegal. But we don't know who did the actual leaking.
 
Flynn's identity was unmasked. That wasn't illegal. Leaking Flynn's name to uncleared personnel was illegal. But we don't know who did the actual leaking.

That is related to the Russian investigation, Flynn was likely unmasked because he is the target of one or more FBI criminal investigations. Hence the pleas for immunity.

The unmasking Nunes leaked was not related to the Russian investigation. And aside from the Nunes and whitehouse leaks, there has not been any leaks of the unmasking of incidental collection of mentions of Trump associates..
 
Unmaking isn't controversial. Unmasking however, is.

You do know these (UNMASKING) activities happen all the time ... the problem for Republicans is, it's just usually not done by a Black Women appointed by a Black Man, who neither can be controlled, manipulated or told what they can or can't do. Other than that, it's been a normal activity for a National Security Adviser for as long as the position has existed, and the participants White.

:lol: Nothing to see here folks.
 
Flynn's identity was unmasked. That wasn't illegal. Leaking Flynn's name to uncleared personnel was illegal. But we don't know who did the actual leaking.

Susan Rice didn't unmask Flynn...but the one name she did unmask has not been released or leaked. So where's the beef?
 
You do know these (UNMASKING) activities happen all the time ... the problem for Republicans is, it's just usually not done by a Black Women appointed by a Black Man, who neither can be controlled, manipulated or told what they can or can't do. Other than that, it's been a normal activity for a National Security Adviser for as long as the position has existed, and the participants White.

:lol: Nothing to see here folks.

:roll:
 
You do know these (UNMASKING) activities happen all the time ... the problem for Republicans is, it's just usually not done by a Black Women appointed by a Black Man, who neither can be controlled, manipulated or told what they can or can't do. Other than that, it's been a normal activity for a National Security Adviser for as long as the position has existed, and the participants White.

:lol: Nothing to see here folks.

Put down the bong.
 
Back
Top Bottom