• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Reports in unmasking controversy were detailed, had info about 'everyday lives'

Praxas said:
So is lying back to being bad now? I thought you guys excused it if it was Trump lying? So hard to keep up with conservative talking points.
Click to expand...

And the false equivalency of the year award goes to this post. Lying about crowd size, or some other inanity, vs lying about illegal activity and spying on the political opposition is ridiculous.
 
Cigar said:
UNMAKING IS NOT A CRIME OR CONTROVERSIAL ... it's just Drama for Drama Queens:
Click to expand...

Without cause and proper approval, yes, it is. This is true regardless if you make it all caps and super cool colors.
 
Praxas said:
So is lying back to being bad now? I thought you guys excused it if it was Trump lying? So hard to keep up with conservative talking points.
Click to expand...

Now, now, Trump doesn't lie - he exaggerates. You can't take him literally, you have to look at "what's in his heart"! What else... oh yeah ... Clinton and Obama lied too!

Bad lefty, for pointing out Trump's flaws.. Bad!
 
Cigar said:
You do know these (UNMASKING) activities happen all the time ... the problem for Republicans is, it's just usually not done by a Black Women appointed by a Black Man, who neither can be controlled, manipulated or told what they can or can't do. Other than that, it's been a normal activity for a National Security Adviser for as long as the position has existed, and the participants White.

:lol: Nothing to see here folks.
Click to expand...

I'm not the brightest crayon in the box but even I can see this statement to be the most transparent and ridiculous attempt at race baiting I've seen in a while.
 
Erod said:
Reports in unmasking controversy were detailed, had info about 'everyday lives' | Fox News

The intelligence reports at the center of the Susan Rice unmasking controversy were detailed, and almost resembled a private investigator’s file, according to a Republican congressman familiar with the documents.

"This is information about their everyday lives," Rep. Peter King of New York, a member of the House Intelligence committee said. "Sort of like in a divorce case where lawyers are hired, investigators are hired just to find out what the other person is doing from morning until night and then you try to piece it together later on.”
Click to expand...

Nothing accidental or peripheral about that. Rice lied.
Click to expand...

She lied about what exactly?

All your quote from the FoxNews piece makes clear is that "the intelligence reports" contained detailed information on the lives of those U.S. citizens who were (presumably) part of Team Trump. It doesn't say that Susan Rice was the one who compiled the report. So, how exactly did she lie here when she didn't write the intelligence reports herself?
 
Objective Voice said:
She lied about what exactly?

All your quote from the FoxNews piece makes clear is that "the intelligence reports" contained detailed information on the lives of those U.S. citizens who were (presumably) part of Team Trump. It doesn't say that Susan Rice was the one who compiled the report. So, how exactly did she lie here when she didn't write the intelligence reports herself?
Click to expand...

The only potentially illegal activity here was the possibility that Nunes improperly disclosed classified material. If you're given information was so classified that you need to go on a secret spy mission to the White House, then it's probably something you shouldn't talk about, let alone call a press conference to discuss.
 
Fishking said:
Without cause and proper approval, yes, it is. This is true regardless if you make it all caps and super cool colors.
Click to expand...
:lol:
 
Erod said:
Reports in unmasking controversy were detailed, had info about 'everyday lives' | Fox News



Nothing accidental or peripheral about that. Rice lied.
Click to expand...

Noop...The Left should have been celebrating Nunez's departure today, but instead are outraged over his replacment.
Whoever thought of bringing in Trey Gowdy is a genius by the way. Way to change the narrative and rain on their parade.

The Left knows the Susan Rice story is bad, real bad. They know those reports are in the hands of the opposition, and the last thing they want to see is Rice taking the 5th in front of Trey Gowdy

Looks like that more likely by the day
 
Mithros said:
The only potentially illegal activity here was the possibility that Nunes improperly disclosed classified material. If you're given information was so classified that you need to go on a secret spy mission to the White House, then it's probably something you shouldn't talk about, let alone call a press conference to discuss.
Click to expand...

Yea, you would think if there was any legitimacy behind that narrative we would have heard it from Schiff.

What classified material did Nunez disclose ? I didnt hear anything specific in that news conference.
 
Objective Voice said:
She lied about what exactly?

All your quote from the FoxNews piece makes clear is that "the intelligence reports" contained detailed information on the lives of those U.S. citizens who were (presumably) part of Team Trump. It doesn't say that Susan Rice was the one who compiled the report. So, how exactly did she lie here when she didn't write the intelligence reports herself?
Click to expand...

Have you not seen this yet ?
 
Fenton said:
Have you not seen this yet ?
Click to expand...


Yes, which is part what I've been replying to. She denied being the one who named names where this Russian hacking investigation is concerned, but didn't deny ever asking who the domestic players were from time-to-time in the performance of her official duties as Obama's NSA.

Next.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom