• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Top Obama Adviser Sought Names of Trump Associates in Intel

So when is the Susan Rice hearing?
 
Cardinal said:
Oh, and another thing? Thanks for confirming that there were yet more investigations into Trump. Way to deflect from Russia, guys! "Hey, how do we get people to stop talking about Trump and Russia? I know! We'll start talking about another crime Trump might be implicated in! It's just crazy enough to work."
Click to expand...
The Russian also have that covered...

russian-matryoshka-stacking-babushka-wooden-dolls-meaning.jpg


:2razz:
 
Will this lie be addressed?

 
Cardinal said:
LOL. Benghazi!!!

Top Cat called it back on page one.
Click to expand...

Rice proved herself as a lying corrupt partisan hack then, and again when she claimed that Bergdal served with distinction, just has she's one again caught on the wrong side of history.

So what's your point to bring up her track record of public lying, dishonest and trustworthiness?

Sure, much more convenient, adopting partisan amnesia, and forgetting about all those times and all those lies. Have fun in your liberal / progressive echo chamber.
 
poweRob said:
Even if you trumpettes got everything you all wanted about Trump being investigated under Obama administration.... Then what? Then the reason for any investigation is moot to you all? I'd bet yes.
Click to expand...

The question then becomes one of abuse of power by the Obama Admin. Why automatically assume that an investigation by 44 into future 45 was well intentioned? Such an investigation is no small potatoes.
We now know what Nunes was up to--- warning that the previous National security advisor was acting rather underhanded. The decision by the Obama Admin to spread intelligence reports throughout the executive department was claimed to be in order to avoid a Trump coverup. Instead, perhaps it was done to make it easy to leak.
 
Simon W. Moon said:
So these organizations will cover the story, they just won't mention that the story is "all blowing up in their faces"
Click to expand...

I am not the one that suggested they wouldn't so your so called "point" is moot.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom