• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump Calls Congressional Inquiry a ‘Witch Hunt’

jmotivator said:
You keep making my argument for me. Thanks, I guess? A "political appeal", you say? So not an ACTUAL legal request for immunity? Hmmmmm.
Click to expand...
For once in your life, drop the "actual" instead of substituting it for what you mean. Let me remind you, you didn't begin your argument with either "actual" or "legal", you simply said:

You mean in that letter where Flynn's lawyer doesn't actually ask for immunity

It is actually a proper use of the term actual since the assertion is that Flynn's lawyer made an actual request for immunity.
Click to expand...
Um, "actual" is used in a comparison, you did not state what the comparison is.
You have actually supported my argument that it wasn't an actual legal request for immunity, but was actually a political statement.
Click to expand...
You never specified "legal" until I did...so no, I'm not supporting your argument, I am as usually showing the incompleteness of your argument.

I deal in actual things.
Click to expand...
Well, I have seen you deal in all sorts of imaginary things, why just a while ago you imagined I said something that I did not, concerning "blame".



My assertion was that he hasn't been requested to testify nor has be been deposed. Both of those are factual statements. Your statement that he will be deposed is an assumption.
Click to expand...
Um, he has been interviewed in the FBI investigation.

By the way, the term "deposed" is usually used in connection with a deposition, which is written testimony by a witness in an actual court case. If your use of deposition is based on the assumption that this investigation will result in an actual prosecution in which Flynn will be deposed then you are dreaming.
Click to expand...

You said:

Nobody who supposedly is part of any investigation has approached Flynn for testimony,

He has, yer wrong...again.

Actual actually has a meaning whether you want it to or not. "Gawds", on the other hand, doesn't have a meaning.
Click to expand...
You go with that.



No, the letter in question was a comment on the state of the "witch hunt" investigation.
Click to expand...
Look at you, removing context, thats cute.




You stated that my statement, which I pulled from the letter, was rhetorical nonsense. Oh dear.... did you not read the letter?
Click to expand...
Your conjecture (remembering even those most minute details incorrectly) was rhetorical bs based on your assumption that you have expertise on federal prosecutorial malfeasance. It has nothing to do with the letter, it was just yer imagination going off into fantasyland.



I understood it perfectly. Don't worry, though, you aren't alone. Most people who badly trample their own argument like you did don't realize they did it. :lamo
Click to expand...
More fantasy on your part, Flynn's lawyer did request immunity, you just confused which sort it is.
 
jmotivator said:
I know.
Click to expand...
No, you didn't, you claimed:

Nobody who supposedly is part of any investigation has approached Flynn for testimony

And yet, you just accepted that he has, so I suppose you could have corrected yourself and said "I know now", but then you couldn't even do that.
And without immunity!
Click to expand...
Well, it wasn't like the FBI would do so without a request....hurr durr.
Keep killing your argument, Gimme. This is too easy.
Click to expand...
Magical fantasyland again.
 
Well, looks like the "Trump colluded with Russia" BS has been exposed as just more media and leftist lies to damage Trump. Wait, maybe Trump colluded with Syria so he could attack them and expose the Russia accusations as ridiculous?
 
Anthony60 said:
Well, looks like the "Trump colluded with Russia" BS has been exposed as just more media and leftist lies to damage Trump. Wait, maybe Trump colluded with Syria so he could attack them and expose the Russia accusations as ridiculous?
Click to expand...

The actual charge is that PERSONS IN THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN MAY HAVE COLLUDED WITH RUSSIA IN THE WIKILEAKS RELEASES.

And that is the subject of several current investigations that are a long way from any definitive conclusions one way or the other.
 
haymarket said:
The actual charge is that PERSONS IN THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN MAY HAVE COLLUDED WITH RUSSIA IN THE WIKILEAKS RELEASES.

And that is the subject of several current investigations that are a long way from any definitive conclusions one way or the other.
Click to expand...

I don't think there is any actual charge. Obviously, Trump has no love, deal, playdate, whatever with Putin, as the left so desperately wants us to believe. What a completely concocted waste of everyone's time and money.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom