• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

2 White House Officials Helped Give Nunes Intelligence Reports

Master PO said:
i simply posted what nunes stated to bill, per the OP statment and thats all.i didnt make any claims
Click to expand...
You didn't post what nunes stated, you posted what Master PO stated. Again, please cite/quote the exact line that you believe nunes stated that contradicts the argument.
 
Master PO said:
i simply posted what nunes stated to bill, per the OP statment and thats all.

i didnt make any claims
Click to expand...

So Committee by FOX, where bill knows more than the Ranking Member !
 
NIMBY said:
On day 70, GOP Rep. Justin Amash calls trump a 5th grader.

How long will trump give himself an A+ grade without grading the papers?

Why is it okay with trumposters for him to tweet before presenting evidence?

Think back to the standard Obama was held to by GOPs .
Click to expand...

why are you telling me this?

is it something you want to get off of your chest, as a way of justification for your views
 
Moot said:
The names of Ezra Cohen-Watnick and Michael Ellis can be verified.

Cohen-Watnick was a protege of Michael Flynn...and Ellis was a former aide to Karl Rove.
Click to expand...

Who told the Times?

The story is complete bull**** unless the Times can name its sources
 
Mach said:
You didn't post what nunes stated, you posted what Master PO stated. Again, please cite/quote the exact line that you believe nunes stated that contradicts the argument.
Click to expand...

wrong, i gave you what nunes said to bill, and even gave the video and where to start
 
Mac77 said:
Who told the Times?

The story is complete bull**** unless the Times can name its sources
Click to expand...

So every story that cannot name its sources to a degree that makes you comfy is 'complete bull****'?

LOL, really?
 
Beaudreaux said:
NSC staffers rather than NSA (I had that part wrong), but still not WH staffers. Go to 1:30 in the video below.



He makes a lot of good points and asks some good questions - less hackish than he has been over all this lately.
Click to expand...


I'm not sure why you're concluding that they're not White House officials, or how this counters any incredulity over the idea that the people on the NSC wouldn't be sending their information up to Trump.
 
Master PO said:
wrong, i gave you what nunes said to bill, and even gave the video and where to start
Click to expand...
When I say "quote it", I mean like this: Nunes: "I am stating here exactly what Master Po stated" line to the source where that comes from ://http etc. Two lines. One a copy/paste URL, and one a direct quote. Posting Bill Oreily's show on Fox news, is unfortunate. If you want to listen to it, and quote from the transcript, do so, just include a rough time stamp and you're done! How easy is it to do this honestly?
 
Mac77 said:
Who told the Times?

The question is who are the Times sources for the story?

they have no verifiable sources so they have no story
Click to expand...

So by your logic, the Watergate coverage should have been ignored and never published. Because there were no "verifiable sources," which is a term you clearly don't understand.
 
Mach said:
When I say "quote it", I mean like this: Nunes: "I am stating here exactly what Master Po stated" line to the source where that comes from ://http etc. Two lines. One a copy/paste URL, and one a direct quote. Posting Bill Oreily's show on Fox news, is unfortunate. If you want to listen to it, and quote from the transcript, do so, just include a rough time stamp and you're done! How easy is it to do this honestly?
Click to expand...
:2razz:, if you dont want to watch you video dont i dont care if you do, but what i stated goes with what nunes said.
 
So its kind of funny watching leftists do their usual **** their pants routine on this.

Apparently...Nunes AS HE STATED went to the WH to view materials...AS HE STATED. He then talked to the media and told them he had gone to the WH to view materials. On camera. In a formal press setting. Clear as day. He was provided with materials (Materials which we kinda can assume were related to the materials Farkas talked about) by people AT THE WH. Just like he said he did last week. He advised the democrats of the material he stated he viewed AT THE WH.

And now...leftists are ****ting themselves because...say...did you hear? Nunes got those materials AT THE WHITE HOUSE!!!

No ****...really? Yep! Sweartagawd!!! At the actual WH. WOW!!! How could we possibly have heard about this before today?
 
VanceMack said:
So its kind of funny watching leftists do their usual **** their pants routine on this.

Apparently...Nunes AS HE STATED went to the WH to view materials...AS HE STATED. He then talked to the media and told them he had gone to the WH to view materials. On camera. In a formal press setting. Clear as day. He was provided with materials (Materials which we kinda can assume were related to the materials Farkas talked about) by people AT THE WH. Just like he said he did last week. He advised the democrats of the material he stated he viewed AT THE WH.

And now...leftists are ****ting themselves because...say...did you hear? Nunes got those materials AT THE WHITE HOUSE!!!

No ****...really? Yep! Sweartagawd!!! At the actual WH. WOW!!! How could we possibly have heard about this before today?
Click to expand...

Yes, he got information from the White House, which he then subsequently needed to return to the White House to warn the President about.

Right.

Who needs strenuous Yoga exercise when you can twist logic into pretzel shapes in order to attempt to defend the indefensible?
 
Cardinal said:
Yes, he got information from the White House, which he then subsequently needed to return to the White House to warn the President about.

Right.
Click to expand...
Which part are you confused about? The part where he got the materials at the WH like he said he did or the part where he talked to the president like he said he did?
 
Cardinal said:
Yes, he got information from the White House, which he then subsequently needed to return to the White House to warn the President about.

Right.

Who needs strenuous Yoga exercise when you can twist logic into pretzel shapes in order to attempt to defend the indefensible?
Click to expand...

how do you know he warned?, and why the pretzel comment?
 
Mustachio said:
So by your logic, the Watergate coverage should have been ignored and never published. Because there were no "verifiable sources," which is a term you clearly don't understand.
Click to expand...

They had a real crime and the watergate burglers in custody to work with

Here the investigaters have nothing except rumors sporead by obama moles in and out og government
 
So who is taking the stand that intelligence agencies are not under civilian control? It doesn't matter where it came from if it is true.

Do you want Team Trump monitoring your candidate on 2020?
 
Beaudreaux said:
According to Schiff in his news conference today, I heard him say numerous times that it was 2 NSA staffers and not WH staffers.
Click to expand...

Well, that makes sense since Ezra Cohen-Watnick is the NSC director which is part of the WH staff.
 
Beaudreaux said:
According to Schiff in his news conference today, I heard him say numerous times that it was 2 NSA staffers and not WH staffers.
Click to expand...


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_National_Security_Council
The HSC and NSC each continue to exist by statute as bodies supporting the President.
Click to expand...

Remember, the white house is part of the investigation...so Nunes from the House, who is supposed to be offering non-partisaian oversight in his investigation of the Russia/hacking scandal, is meeting with the WH and then releases partial info to the public to give Trump justification his entirely false "I've been wiretapped by Obama!! Halp!" tweet.

That they are in the WH, and under the WH, is what's key I suspect.

They work in direct support of the white house, I think that's the point.
 
Master PO said:
:2razz:, if you dont want to watch you video dont i dont care if you do, but what i stated goes with what nunes said.
Click to expand...

You can't quote it can you!? Doesn't that feel wrong in your heart-of-hearts?
You forfeit, by your own refusal after what...3-4 requests?
Enjoy!
 
Mach said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_National_Security_Council


Remember, the white house is part of the investigation...so Nunes from the House, who is supposed to be offering non-partisaian oversight in his investigation of the Russia/hacking scandal, is meeting with the WH and then releases partial info to the public to give Trump justification his entirely false "I've been wiretapped by Obama!! Halp!" tweet.

That they are in the WH, and under the WH, is what's key I suspect.

They work in direct support of the white house, I think that's the point.
Click to expand...

do you mean NSA?
 
VanceMack said:
Which part are you confused about? The part where he got the materials at the WH like he said he did or the part where he talked to the president like he said he did?
Click to expand...

The fact that he needed to brief the President about information he'd already have because the NSC would have sent the information up to him.

Seriously, replace all the current names with those of a Clinton administration and a Democrat-chaired intelligence committee, but keep all the facts the same, and I think even you can see why this is shady as hell.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom