• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

After GOP Health Bill’s Demise, More States Weigh Expanding Medicaid

TobyOne said:
More pigs are bellying up to the trough. Trump should concentrate on fixing pieces of Obamacare. For example, he can propose legislation that limits medicaid expansion without repealing all of Obamacare, he can propose legislation which eliminates hate boner taxes and he can repeal the individual mandate. He can also reduce or remove subsidies for Obamacare.

Its all sillyness anyway as the healthcare systems spirals into non sustainable cost increases.
Click to expand...

At the rate at which I see hospitals and other medical centers expanding, sounds to me like ACA was making America great again. :)
 
Mycroft said:
So...the fed's money will be dropping. How does that help states to expand their programs...and how do they expect to get the feds to pay for their expansion?
Click to expand...

I don't really understand your question. The feds picking up 90%+ of the tab for expansion is obviously a huge help. And the terms outlined in the law is how they expect to get the feds to pay that 90%+ share.
 
JasperL said:
I don't really understand your question. The feds picking up 90%+ of the tab for expansion is obviously a huge help. And the terms outlined in the law is how they expect to get the feds to pay that 90%+ share.
Click to expand...

Well, since I cannot read the OP's article, perhaps I don't have the info I need to present a reasonable question. Let's face it, all I have to go by is what the OP and other say...not necessarily accurate or reliable information.

I guess the only real solution is for me to bow out of this thread.
 
Mycroft said:
Well, since I cannot read the OP's article, perhaps I don't have the info I need to present a reasonable question. Let's face it, all I have to go by is what the OP and other say...not necessarily accurate or reliable information.
I guess the only real solution is for me to bow out of this thread.
Click to expand...
Precisely.
But not because of my excerpt-only, but your unwillingness to spend a few seconds googling (for info/rebuttal/etc) at any point since the OP.
A practice that virtually everyone else interested uses here.
 
Last edited:
mbig said:
Precisely.
But not because of my excerpt-only, but your unwillingness to spend a few seconds googling (for info/rebuttal/etc) at any point since the OP.
A practice that virtually everyone else interested uses here.
Click to expand...

Your thread. You posted that WSJ crap. I shouldn't have to spend MY time searching for something YOU posted.

You...and your thread...are dismissed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom