• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump Son-in-Law Jared Kushner Met Chief of Sanctioned Russian Bank

mbig said:
That meeting's very taking place was Undisclosed, even amidst the Russian Ambassador flap.
And it's not just a bank like Chase or Citi, it's the Financial arm (Bagman) of the Kremlin set up by the Ambassador/spy. You don't run in for a mortgage.
NO one outside the inner circle knew, in fact it was denied by Spicey early.
It doesn't prove anything, but would be consistent with corruption attempts.

I'm saying your post was disingenuous/fallacious BS. Demanding "proof," or what was said in the meetings, which we obviously don't know yet (and probably won't ever), but only learned of through investigation and Leaks.. Not disclosure.

got it now?
Click to expand...

So you can't portray it as nefarious until we know what was said, so why the negative post if you literally know nothing?
 
Mason66 said:
So you can't portray it as nefarious until we know what was said, so why the negative post if you literally know nothing?
Click to expand...
As I said:
""It doesn't prove anything, but would be consistent with corruption attempts.""

In fact, EVERYTHING piece we've learned so far is Consistent with Trump's [Otherwise] Inexplicable man-crush on Putin/Russia.
These pieces of circumstantial evidence (strings) need to be looked at together.. another piece falling into place.
From Flynn, to Manafort, to Russia's intervening/hacking for Trumpov, it Reeks.

Spare me another strawman.
 
Last edited:
mbig said:
As I said:
""It doesn't prove anything, but would be consistent with corruption attempts.""

In fact, EVERYTHING piece we've learned so far is Consistent with Trump's [Otherwise] Inexplicable man-crush on Putin/Russia.
These pieces of circumstantial evidence (strings) need to be looked at together.. another piece falling into place.
From Flynn, to Manafort, to Russia's intervening/hacking for Trumpov, it Reeks.

Spare me another strawman.
Click to expand...

Why do you think the bolded above is true?
 
Mach said:
How could you not think that?
Click to expand...

A meeting automatically means corruption to you?

Why would you think that off the bat?
 
Mason66 said:
A meeting automatically means corruption to you?

Why would you think that off the bat?
Click to expand...
I didn't say that at all: to the contrary!
As I said TWICE..
mbig again said:
As I said:
""It doesn't prove anything, but would be Consistent with corruption attempts.""

In fact, EVERYTHING piece we've learned so far is Consistent with Trump's [Otherwise] Inexplicable man-crush on Putin/Russia.
These pieces of circumstantial evidence (strings) need to be looked at Together.. another piece falling into place.
From Flynn, to Manafort, to Russia's intervening/hacking for Trumpov, it Reeks.

Spare me another strawman.
Click to expand...
Can you not read, or are you DISHONESTLY trolling/gratuitously last-wording?
 
Last edited:
Mason66 said:
A meeting automatically means corruption to you?
Why would you think that off the bat?
Click to expand...
Mason66, it's not just "a meeting" that has been simmering since October with regards to Russia and the election, and the Flynn, and now ties with lots of people, etc., all who would stand to benefit (have motive), etc.
Of course it doesn't mean corruption, but it certainly looks consistent with that hypothesis.
 
mbig said:
Putin and Hillary were enemies!
It's been settled that the Russians acted to interfere, and do so on the side OF TRUMP.
Click to expand...

Any chance that the Russians were playing a "win / win" game?

In short, offer to assist Hillary first as the likely winner by releasing any dirt on Trump in exchange for Hillary's well known practice of selling influence under the guise of "speaking fees" or "donations" to the Clinton Foundation (Such donations are filtered through other subsidiaries of the Clinton Foundation before going to the poor).

Perhaps Hillary evaluated the Russian Trump dirt and found it to be little in quantity and over priced. The Russians then offer the same deal to Trump for Hillary dirt. My guess is that Trump bit. Heck, maybe the Russians offered deals to both camps simultaneously- first one to accept gets all the dirt.:cool:
 
Last edited:
Mason66 said:
A meeting automatically means corruption to you? Why would you think that off the bat?
Click to expand...
VEB bank is the Kremlin's bank and the bank of choice for corrupt Russian officials/oligarchs.

No one asks questions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom