• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Paul Manafort Once Worked to ‘Benefit the Putin Government’: Report

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
94,136
Reaction score
82,407
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Paul Manafort Once Worked to ‘Benefit the Putin Government’: Report


March 22, 2017
by ERIK ORTIZ

95889190_Paul-Manafort-news-large_trans_NvBQzQNjv4Bqejct6gFShbOYZYlg8Amtneof0VMGKnOSfIlF7A9HT4w.jpg


The White House distanced itself from a new report Wednesday that alleges Trump's former campaign manager, Paul Manafort, worked for a Russian billionaire more than a decade ago in order to advance the agenda of Russian President Vladimir Putin. The explosive report by The Associated Press appears to undermine assertions by the Trump administration and Manafort that he had never worked to promote Russia's global influence. "It would be inappropriate for us to comment on a person who is not a White House employee," White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer told NBC News.

Manafort, working as a consultant, signed a $10 million annual contract with Russian aluminum magnate Oleg Deripaska in 2006 after pitching plans to help Russian interests around the world, the AP reported. Deripaska was a known ally of Putin.
"We are now of the belief that this model can greatly benefit the Putin Government if employed at the correct levels with the appropriate commitment to success," Manafort purportedly wrote in a confidential 2005 memo to Deripaska obtained by the AP. Manafort had worked as Trump's campaign chairman last year before he resigned in August. He had been plagued with media coverage surrounding questions about his ties to the pro-Russian government in Ukraine.
Trumps former campaign manager was apparently paid handsomely by a Putin oligarch to promote the Kremlin's interests in Washington. Manafort never registered as an agent for a foreign government. The Trump campaign/administration has consistently denied Manafort's Russian ties.
 
Manafort was apparently stupid enough to embezzle $19 from a billionaire bud of Putin.
 
Manafort was apparently stupid enough to embezzle $19 from a billionaire bud of Putin.
The article says Manafort signed a $10 million per annum consulting contract with Putin confidant Oleg Deripaska. Nothing about embezzlement.
 
The article says Manafort signed a $10 million per annum consulting contract with Putin confidant Oleg Deripaska. Nothing about embezzlement.

From the original AP report:

"Manafort's work with Deripaska continued for years, though they had a falling out laid bare in 2014 in a Cayman Islands bankruptcy court. The billionaire gave Manafort nearly $19 million to invest in a Ukrainian TV company called Black Sea Cable, according to legal filings by Deripaska's representatives. It said that after taking the money, Manafort and his associates stopped responding to Deripaska's queries about how the funds had been used.

Early in the 2016 presidential campaign, Deripaska's representatives openly accused Manafort of fraud and pledged to recover the money from him. After Trump earned the nomination, Deripaska's representatives said they would no longer discuss the case." https://apnews.com/122ae0b5848345faa88108a03de40c5a
 
I'm just curious if I understand a civics thing accurately. If the FBI came forward with a definitive open-and-shut case of collusion between Trump and Russia, it would still be down to Congress to impeach him, right? Or, if Trump was caught on video murdering a jogger, could the police stroll into the Oval Office and put him in cuffs or does even that still require impeachment?
 
I'm just curious if I understand a civics thing accurately. If the FBI came forward with a definitive open-and-shut case of collusion between Trump and Russia, it would still be down to Congress to impeach him, right? Or, if Trump was caught on video murdering a jogger, could the police stroll into the Oval Office and put him in cuffs or does even that still require impeachment?
I looked into this not that long ago. IIRC, Trump has to be impeached and removed from office before he can be prosecuted by a LEO. But ... Pence could grant a full and unconditional pardon for any crimes Trump might have committed against the United States while president, a'la Ford/Nixon.
 
The article says Manafort signed a $10 million per annum consulting contract with Putin confidant Oleg Deripaska. Nothing about embezzlement.

I'm laughing as the Trump-haters begin to eat their own. You all have created so many fake news stories that you can't even keep them straight.
 
From the original AP report:

"Manafort's work with Deripaska continued for years, though they had a falling out laid bare in 2014 in a Cayman Islands bankruptcy court. The billionaire gave Manafort nearly $19 million to invest in a Ukrainian TV company called Black Sea Cable, according to legal filings by Deripaska's representatives. It said that after taking the money, Manafort and his associates stopped responding to Deripaska's queries about how the funds had been used.

Early in the 2016 presidential campaign, Deripaska's representatives openly accused Manafort of fraud and pledged to recover the money from him. After Trump earned the nomination, Deripaska's representatives said they would no longer discuss the case." https://apnews.com/122ae0b5848345faa88108a03de40c5a
Why would a presidential candidate even associate with such lowlife's? The lowlife world is also Trumps norm.
 
Back
Top Bottom