• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on Tru

Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

It's not dude but dudette, get it right.

I don't find it whackadoodle to try and investigate claims being made by others whether it is in the press or on this board.

Contrary to your commentary, there are reports out there that the tape of Michelle did exist.
.
...

Sorry, dudette. After all that we've learned about Johnson in the last ten years, if you want to cling to this guy and still maintain there may actually be a Whitey tape, that's on you. Dismiss his cut and splice hoax to call a purple star recipient a war criminal & rapist, to present words someone never said as real. That's lower than low.

If that's the kind of guy you want to back, there really can be no discussion. Some people cannot be reasoned with.

Chow.
 
Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

Yes, and those three sources are:

1. I sucked it out of my thumb

2. I pulled it out of my ass/behind

3. I got it off the top of my head
 
Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

Sorry, dudette. After all that we've learned about Johnson in the last ten years, if you want to cling to this guy and still maintain there may actually be a Whitey tape, that's on you. Dismiss his cut and splice hoax to call a purple star recipient a war criminal & rapist, to present words someone never said as real. That's lower than low.

If that's the kind of guy you want to back, there really can be no discussion. Some people cannot be reasoned with.

Chow.
I noticed you edited my post. LOL
 
Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

Yeah, the off-topic further crazy-cakes was snipped, with ellipses, noting the edit.

Have fun in the future. Maybe one day you may actually get to see that infamous "Whitey Tape" so many cons were desperate to view.

Good luck!
 
Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

It's not dude but dudette, get it right.

I don't find it whackadoodle to try and investigate claims being made by others whether it is in the press or on this board.

Contrary to your commentary, there are reports out there that the tape of Michelle did exist.
.
So you think he is a real hoaxter, fine. But he was supporting Clinton when he made those comments.

And here is something for you and the rest so wanting to find Trump really guilty of something....

Do you like the dirt Buzzfeed puts out? Like publishing the Dossier of Trump when so far just about every agency says there is no truth to it? Were you one salivating over the possibility that Trump engaged in "Golden Showers"? I do recall you were one of them.

Well here is the latest from Buzzfeed.

https://www.buzzfeed.com/kenbensing...on-dollar-hoax?utm_term=.fprVvKg9Y#.bl5PN4j9X

You see the left is so desperate to acquire crap on Trump or anyone in his administration they are willing to believe anything. This particular time it was targeting Sec. of State Tillerson.

For more commentary on the reporting,

Ex-DNC Official Worked With Bomb Maker To Investigate Trump | The Daily Caller

This is where we are at. So to those on this forum who can't stand Trump and have proved they are willing to believe any derogatory thing about him maybe should ponder on the links above for some perspective.


Typically you are using some pretty esoteric bull**** from some sleazy blog to maker a case that anyone who finds fault with him hates him. That's the same game the Obama people used to play, only they added the race card. There is NO DIFFERENCE betwen Democrats and Republicans.

I really don't care what some blog called buzzfeed says about Trump, I care what Trump is saying about America, and the fact almost everything he says is either a direct lie, exaggeration or a reversal on what he's said before. At least five times he has claimed to have met with and has an ongoing personal relationship with Vladimyr Putin, and at least five times he has denied he has any such relationship and makes like he's a victim.

It's time his followers held him to task. It's time he grew a pair and faced the results of his lies rather than sending out highly paid flacks to take the heat for him.

For the record I have been accused of hating by both sides, and that's on you, the right who were SO offended when Obama's people did the same thing.

That's outright hypocrisy.
 
Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

Typically you are using some pretty esoteric bull**** from some sleazy blog to maker a case that anyone who finds fault with him hates him. That's the same game the Obama people used to play, only they added the race card. There is NO DIFFERENCE betwen Democrats and Republicans.

I really don't care what some blog called buzzfeed says about Trump, I care what Trump is saying about America, and the fact almost everything he says is either a direct lie, exaggeration or a reversal on what he's said before. At least five times he has claimed to have met with and has an ongoing personal relationship with Vladimyr Putin, and at least five times he has denied he has any such relationship and makes like he's a victim.

It's time his followers held him to task. It's time he grew a pair and faced the results of his lies rather than sending out highly paid flacks to take the heat for him.

For the record I have been accused of hating by both sides, and that's on you, the right who were SO offended when Obama's people did the same thing.

That's outright hypocrisy.

Go back and re-read my post. Buzzfeed is the one that published the Trump Dossier. And now they are claiming a member of the DNC a supporter of Clinton hooked up with a felon in search for some dirt on Tillerson. They ended up paying a billion dollars when it was all said and done for fake documents.

My point was the same website that published a dossier on Trump that claimed "golden showers" by prostitutes which many of those here on this forum so badly wanted to believe, are now warning those that despise Trump not to fall for fake documents.

It is a stellar example of how deep Trump Derangement runs that they will pay super big bucks for anything they think may stick to Trump..this time it was through his confirmed Sec. of State Tillerson.

I don't see all these reversals you claim on the contrary I see a man working very hard to fulfill his campaign promises. And that is coming from someone who had no hopes for Trump.

Right now it is overturning Obamacare and replacing . Trump does not have the votes to pass it in the House as is on Thursday. The Freedom Caucus is holding out for changes that will guarantee lower premiums. You see a lot of this Ryan bill is designed to bailout the insurance agencies and not the U.S. Citizen who is forced to pay higher premiums. Glad they are holding out because if they want this thing to pass on Thursday, major changes need to occur. I am thrilled with the standoff by the Freedom Caucus for the American people. If they come to consensus then it goes to the Senate where it will be tweaked even more as the bill stands in the House there is no way it will pass the Senate 51 votes.

Today he signed an EO that will once again fund NASA for space exploration something that hasn't been done for the past 8 years. Obama used NASA to fund an agenda called Climate Change. I was elated.

Gorsuch, Trump's pick for the SC just finished two days of grilling and any red state Dem who does not vote to confirm that man will have a hard time splaining that one to their constituents. This is the only reason I voted for Trump and he delivered. It by all counts looks like Gorsuch will be confirmed. I am so elated that this man will be seated on the SC. For he has such an impeccable record of not making rulings on what he might find against his own personal beliefs but by the Constitution.

I'll let you in on a little secret most on this forum have not clue.

When Trump signed the EO to further space studies instead of Obama's 8 years of using it for Climate Change, it was Ted Cruz standing next to him. And he received the pen when Trurmp signed the EO and was quoted as saying Texan's are thankful for this. You see "Hello Houston we have a problem" is now null and void.

It was Ted Cruz who was asked by VP Pence what it would take to get Cruz on board with the Trump campaign and Cruz replied a promise of a jurist in the mold of Scalia. He presented to Pence a list he had compiled that fit the bill. The very next day the Trump campaign updated their original list to include Cruz's recommendations. Gorsuch was not on Trump's original list it was Cruz's choice.
Cruz was also on Face the Nation this past Sunday and he revealed he had been in talks with Trump and other Conservatives on what it would take to pass repeal and replace. He laid it out. All the buckets Ryan's plan offers isn't going to fly in the Senate. And I believe that is why the Freedom Caucus is standing firm and do believe that in the end of all this sausage making they will come up with a bill that will pass the muster of all.

You hate Trump ....I get it.... but I am here to tell you that as one who had no expectations of him has actually delivered on key things and not only that has shown a willingness to work with all factions of the Republican party. He turned out to be a guy who actually listens.
 
Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

If you wish to put a limit of a public apology, that's your choice. Some want to see the words from Trump or it doesn't count, I bet there's even some who want a candy scented apology letter with kisses on while he's on bended knee. I'm fine with representative of one govt calling another and apologising with reassurances it won't happen again.

So far, neither Spicer not Trump have or will apologise. Trump did his expected thing and threw Napolitano under a bus. I expect no better from him.

I am not putting a limit on it. In American politics until you publicly apologize it means nothing. It's also very rare to publicly apologize. It took the US over 40 years to apologize all the German, Japanese and Italian who were put in Internment Camps during WW2. US still hasn't apologized for it's WW1 internment of German and German Americans.

My point is that a Rep calling another Rep saying it won't happen again doesn't mean it won't happen again. US apologizes this way almost every day for something it does. Then goes on to do it again. So it's not a very sincere way of doing it to the US. Think of it like this.. it's like a kid apologizing to just his or her parents for breaking curfew, but next night breaks curfew again. Until that kid has to do it in front of their friends, nothing will change.
 
Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

Go back and re-read my post. Buzzfeed is the one that published the Trump Dossier. And now they are claiming a member of the DNC a supporter of Clinton hooked up with a felon in search for some dirt on Tillerson. They ended up paying a billion dollars when it was all said and done for fake documents.

My point was the same website that published a dossier on Trump that claimed "golden showers" by prostitutes which many of those here on this forum so badly wanted to believe, are now warning those that despise Trump not to fall for fake documents.

It is a stellar example of how deep Trump Derangement runs that they will pay super big bucks for anything they think may stick to Trump..this time it was through his confirmed Sec. of State Tillerson.

I don't see all these reversals you claim on the contrary I see a man working very hard to fulfill his campaign promises. And that is coming from someone who had no hopes for Trump.

Right now it is overturning Obamacare and replacing . Trump does not have the votes to pass it in the House as is on Thursday. The Freedom Caucus is holding out for changes that will guarantee lower premiums. You see a lot of this Ryan bill is designed to bailout the insurance agencies and not the U.S. Citizen who is forced to pay higher premiums. Glad they are holding out because if they want this thing to pass on Thursday, major changes need to occur. I am thrilled with the standoff by the Freedom Caucus for the American people. If they come to consensus then it goes to the Senate where it will be tweaked even more as the bill stands in the House there is no way it will pass the Senate 51 votes.

Today he signed an EO that will once again fund NASA for space exploration something that hasn't been done for the past 8 years. Obama used NASA to fund an agenda called Climate Change. I was elated.

Gorsuch, Trump's pick for the SC just finished two days of grilling and any red state Dem who does not vote to confirm that man will have a hard time splaining that one to their constituents. This is the only reason I voted for Trump and he delivered. It by all counts looks like Gorsuch will be confirmed. I am so elated that this man will be seated on the SC. For he has such an impeccable record of not making rulings on what he might find against his own personal beliefs but by the Constitution.

I'll let you in on a little secret most on this forum have not clue.

When Trump signed the EO to further space studies instead of Obama's 8 years of using it for Climate Change, it was Ted Cruz standing next to him. And he received the pen when Trurmp signed the EO and was quoted as saying Texan's are thankful for this. You see "Hello Houston we have a problem" is now null and void.

It was Ted Cruz who was asked by VP Pence what it would take to get Cruz on board with the Trump campaign and Cruz replied a promise of a jurist in the mold of Scalia. He presented to Pence a list he had compiled that fit the bill. The very next day the Trump campaign updated their original list to include Cruz's recommendations. Gorsuch was not on Trump's original list it was Cruz's choice.
Cruz was also on Face the Nation this past Sunday and he revealed he had been in talks with Trump and other Conservatives on what it would take to pass repeal and replace. He laid it out. All the buckets Ryan's plan offers isn't going to fly in the Senate. And I believe that is why the Freedom Caucus is standing firm and do believe that in the end of all this sausage making they will come up with a bill that will pass the muster of all.

You hate Trump ....I get it.... but I am here to tell you that as one who had no expectations of him has actually delivered on key things and not only that has shown a willingness to work with all factions of the Republican party. He turned out to be a guy who actually listens.


Of for ****s sakes.

Tell it to someone who gives a ****. It's time to stop playing victim and pony up to the bar.

This is the most hypocritical I have seen the alt-wrong.

There is no "hate", for **** sakes you people raked Obama far worse than this and here you are bitching like a baby. Time to take responsibility for this ass hole's gaffs, lies and misdeeds and stop whining about ****ing buzzfeed...as if anyone who was not already thinking that way would give it two minutes consideration.

Is Trump the president or his he a victim of verbal attacks. Boo ****ing hoo, he's 70 years old not 7.

It's disgusting the way you people heaped abuse on Obama, remember Moochell? God, you people went on and on about Michelle's wardrobe for ****s sakes. Now, people raise real issues about what's going on with Trump and Russia and all you people can do is bleat about "oh, they're saying mean things about us.

It's no wonder the country's ****ed. Look who are the voters.

Grow up.
 
Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

I am not putting a limit on it. In American politics until you publicly apologize it means nothing. It's also very rare to publicly apologize. It took the US over 40 years to apologize all the German, Japanese and Italian who were put in Internment Camps during WW2. US still hasn't apologized for it's WW1 internment of German and German Americans.

My point is that a Rep calling another Rep saying it won't happen again doesn't mean it won't happen again. US apologizes this way almost every day for something it does. Then goes on to do it again. So it's not a very sincere way of doing it to the US. Think of it like this.. it's like a kid apologizing to just his or her parents for breaking curfew, but next night breaks curfew again. Until that kid has to do it in front of their friends, nothing will change.

Point proven.
 
Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

Some Fox commentators certainly supported Trump, but I don't think their news personnel were especially off center. And don't forget it was Megyn Kelly who lobbed the biggest grenade at Trump.

Megyn Kelly was brutalized by the Trump faithful for asking a simple question that many of us wanted to know. When precisely did the man decide he was a Republican and not a Democrat? Fair question, and instead the sheep declared her a bully and persona non grata. That's just when I knew how much disarray the Republican party was in.

I don't think Bret Baier has been in Trump's camp. The biggest Trump water carriers on Fox are Hannity, O'Reilly and the cast of Fox & Friends.
 
Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

Yeah, the off-topic further crazy-cakes was snipped, with ellipses, noting the edit.

Have fun in the future. Maybe one day you may actually get to see that infamous "Whitey Tape" so many cons were desperate to view.

Good luck!
I didn't say I backed him. and as far as the whitey tape there are reports claiming it did exist.
I didn't know about him until yesterday. I've been asking questions and digging around since his name was mentioned in regard to Napolitano's comments. That's usually what people do when they are trying to get to the truth of something.
 
Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

I didn't say I backed him. and as far as the whitey tape there are reports claiming it did exist.
...
There are reports Big Foot exists, too.
 
Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

Of for ****s sakes.

Tell it to someone who gives a ****. It's time to stop playing victim and pony up to the bar.

This is the most hypocritical I have seen the alt-wrong.

There is no "hate", for **** sakes you people raked Obama far worse than this and here you are bitching like a baby. Time to take responsibility for this ass hole's gaffs, lies and misdeeds and stop whining about ****ing buzzfeed...as if anyone who was not already thinking that way would give it two minutes consideration.

Is Trump the president or his he a victim of verbal attacks. Boo ****ing hoo, he's 70 years old not 7.

It's disgusting the way you people heaped abuse on Obama, remember Moochell? God, you people went on and on about Michelle's wardrobe for ****s sakes. Now, people raise real issues about what's going on with Trump and Russia and all you people can do is bleat about "oh, they're saying mean things about us.

It's no wonder the country's ****ed. Look who are the voters.

Grow up.

Man oh man, who pissed in your cornflakes?

You have totally misrepresented what I posted and missed the entire point. The point of my post to you was to point out how the Democrats have twice put out a lot of money for "documents" that they thought would bring down Trump. First they paid millions for the Trump Dossier which proved to be bull poop. Now the same website that posted the Dossier online is now warning others to be very careful of falling for scams where people say they have the goods on Trump or someone in his administration. It turns out someone in the DNC teamed up with a felon to acquire documents that would sink Sec of State Tillerson. they paid an excessive amount of money for them only to discover they were fake.

You see there are people who hate him so much they are willing to pay exuberant amounts of money for anything that my bring down his administration. But twice now they have been sold BS.

The other part of my post which was wordy was just to share with you the things that I have been pleased to see Trump keep his word on. And furthermore when it comes to Michelle, I don't believe I ever referred to her as Moochelle but I have in the past called Trump Cheeto Dustface or Drumpf during the primaries.

So your comments to me are out of line and unfounded.
 
Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

Man oh man, who pissed in your cornflakes?

You have totally misrepresented what I posted and missed the entire point. The point of my post to you was to point out how the Democrats have twice put out a lot of money for "documents" that they thought would bring down Trump. First they paid millions for the Trump Dossier which proved to be bull poop. Now the same website that posted the Dossier online is now warning others to be very careful of falling for scams where people say they have the goods on Trump or someone in his administration. It turns out someone in the DNC teamed up with a felon to acquire documents that would sink Sec of State Tillerson. they paid an excessive amount of money for them only to discover they were fake.

You see there are people who hate him so much they are willing to pay exuberant amounts of money for anything that my bring down his administration. But twice now they have been sold BS.

The other part of my post which was wordy was just to share with you the things that I have been pleased to see Trump keep his word on. And furthermore when it comes to Michelle, I don't believe I ever referred to her as Moochelle but I have in the past called Trump Cheeto Dustface or Drumpf during the primaries.

So your comments to me are out of line and unfounded.


I'm not bothering to read your posts as they are no more than wall paper on irrelevance. I really do not care one wit what you are pleased about the Rump administration. It's all smoke screen.

I hate no one and I am not treating Trump ANY differently that Obama or Bush.

As far as being pissed, I am. For eight years I have read your post on Obama.....I was there I know what you said and how to battled with the Obamabots, how furious you were with these very strategies and now conduct them. The women of this ugly segment of American society attacked the entire Obama family, you made it personal, going waaaay past the issues attacking the first lady! That's hate, It is also blatant hypocrisy.

You all went ape **** every time Obama took a holiday...but now you defend Trump's garish and expensive lifestyle as paid for by the taxpayers.
hard hitting as I have dealt with Trump.....yet you go to the victim card, knowing it isn't true and play the victim card. That. I take as a personal insult because if anyone should know differently it should be you.

If your are victims and are truly so bad off with the "hate", then Trump must resign. If he is too immature, too thin skinned to handle the job without childish retaliation he is unfit for office.

Compared to this, this wallowing in "they're saying bad things about" Obama was a far superior president and I am on record a thousand times or more on my criticisms of his administration.

And you're unfailing response has been to attack my credibility and accuse me of "hate" so as to try to lessen the impact of my comments.

Once again I am thoroughly disgusted with the alt-right in here and the stupid and irrelevant attacks on my character when every one of you has been there "thanking" my posts all along.


Good day, but I am totally done here.
 
Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

Megyn Kelly was brutalized by the Trump faithful for asking a simple question that many of us wanted to know. When precisely did the man decide he was a Republican and not a Democrat? Fair question, and instead the sheep declared her a bully and persona non grata. That's just when I knew how much disarray the Republican party was in.

I don't think Bret Baier has been in Trump's camp. The biggest Trump water carriers on Fox are Hannity, O'Reilly and the cast of Fox & Friends.

In a discussion of Fox, it doesn't matter what the "Trump faithful" did.
 
Back
Top Bottom