- Joined
- Oct 17, 2006
- Messages
- 59,363
- Reaction score
- 27,049
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
https://www.yahoo.com/news/cops-tell-uber-driver-stop-164303407.html
Good for this guy. I think referencing non-existent laws when trying to arrest somebody should be a fireable offense. It probably isn't, but it should be. What really annoys me is that the cop feels the need to point out 'my sargeant' when the Uber guy says 'your friend'. As if 'your friend' is meant to be an offensive term coming from this little guy.
[FONT="]Becker told Bright that he was going to search his car. When Bright refused, Becker called for a K-9 unit.[/FONT][FONT="]That's when Bright tells the cops he's an attorney, and offers up his American Bar Association card to prove it. [/FONT]
[FONT="]The K-9 unit was brought in, and according to the cops, indicated a presence of narcotics, allowing cops to do a full search of the vehicle. They found nothing. [/FONT]
[FONT="]Both the Bright and his passenger were released without charges. [/FONT]
[FONT="]According to WECT, the Wilmington Police Department started an internal affairs investigation last Friday. On Wednesday, Chief Ralph Evangelous issued the following statement, which will also be given to officers to read in the future:[/FONT]
[FONT="]"Taking photographs and videos of people that are in plain sight including the police is your legal right. As a matter of fact we invite citizens to do so when they believe it is necessary. We believe that public videos help to protect the police as well as our citizens and provide critical information during police and citizen interaction."[/FONT]
Good for this guy. I think referencing non-existent laws when trying to arrest somebody should be a fireable offense. It probably isn't, but it should be. What really annoys me is that the cop feels the need to point out 'my sargeant' when the Uber guy says 'your friend'. As if 'your friend' is meant to be an offensive term coming from this little guy.