• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ohio investigation found 385 non-US citizens registered to vote, 82 cast illegal vote

Re: Ohio investigation found 385 non-US citizens registered to vote, 82 cast illegal

Paperview said:
Yah. You do. Get this, crankypants -----------> an allegation is not PROOF.


Weird I even have to explain this to you. Over and over again.
Click to expand...

Evidence is proof.
Not sure what part of that you don't seem to get.
Continue your denial fallacies though.

They won't help you.

I know weird you keep denying the fact that they have the evidence needed to make the arrest.
That evidence would be ballots cast by the people that were not supposed to cast the.

I even posted you the direct quote from a state official.
You didn't seem to read it.
 
Re: Ohio investigation found 385 non-US citizens registered to vote, 82 cast illegal

NIMBY said:
Your allegation is exactly like the first 100 lies of trump, with no verifiable evidence.

Exactly like the lying allegations made by your dear leader trump about Obama's birth certificate .
Click to expand...

They have the evidence clear as day.
Someone who wasn't supposed to vote voted. They have their signature etc...

Evidence is evidence and no matter how much you want to deny won't change fact.
 
Re: Ohio investigation found 385 non-US citizens registered to vote, 82 cast illegal

NIMBY said:
Can you tell us which Ohio races were flipped because of these 82 votes?

You GOPosters always say an illegal voter votes DEM until you find out they're GOPs, such as we've seen in Indiana?

Isn't the incompetent GOP admin in Ohio to blame for these 82 illegal voters ?
Click to expand...
Your strawman is blowing away you better go catch it.

you can't seem to handle the argument so you are just throwing crap at a wall.

The argument is the same 82 people had their vote nullified because 82 illegal votes were cast.

So you continue to strawman I will just sit back and laugh that you can't handle the argument.

If you notice I didn't mention party or anything else. Why? Because it doesn't matter.
 
Re: Ohio investigation found 385 non-US citizens registered to vote, 82 cast illegal

ludin said:
Evidence is proof.
Not sure what part of that you don't seem to get.
Continue your denial fallacies though.

They won't help you.
Click to expand...
So, so sad. An allegation is not PROOF.

I know weird you keep denying the fact that they have the evidence needed to make the arrest.
That evidence would be ballots cast by the people that were not supposed to cast the.

I even posted you the direct quote from a state official.
You didn't seem to read it.
Click to expand...
You quoted an allegation. Post PROOF theY [The SoS]:"have evidence." Go on. Do it.

You can't.


And you know it.

Because an investigation has yet to be done, champ.
 
Re: Ohio investigation found 385 non-US citizens registered to vote, 82 cast illegal

Paperview said:
So, so sad. An allegation is not PROOF.

You quoted an allegation. Post PROOF theY [The SoS]:"have evidence." Go on. Do it.

You can't.


And you know it.

Because an investigation has yet to be done, champ.
Click to expand...

No I quoted the evidence learn the difference.

They have turned that evidence over to the state attorney's office to pursue charges.
You really don't seem to know what it ou are talking about which is normal.

Ps typing in big bold letters doesn't make it any more true.
 
Re: Ohio investigation found 385 non-US citizens registered to vote, 82 cast illegal

ludin said:
No I quoted the evidence learn the difference.

They have turned that evidence over to the state attorney's office to pursue charges.
You really don't seem to know what it ou are talking about which is normal.

Ps typing in big bold letters doesn't make it any more true.
Click to expand...

Are you 12 years old? Do you really not understand how adjudication works?

Seriously.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom