- Joined
- Mar 3, 2010
- Messages
- 60,458
- Reaction score
- 12,357
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Now you're just throwing out platitudes. What UHC primarily has to do with is providing healthcare to a county's population in the most effective, efficient way possible. There are dozens of ways to do it but what they all have in common is some sort of UHC component, with subsidies for the poor, etc.
It's like saying, "the interstate highway system has nothing to do with market freedom but with government control." And you could insert 100 different things in that line. I guess that's somewhat true, but it's drivel. Governments build critical infrastructure from taxes because it works better than letting "markets" do it. The entire world has decided that UHC works better than our system, and the results speak for themselves.
No, I'm not actually the one that did that. You said the countries promoted market freedom and then used UHC as an example of that. The fact is UHC has nothing to do with market freedom, but is in fact a way for the government to CONTROL the healthcare market.