- Joined
- Sep 13, 2007
- Messages
- 79,903
- Reaction score
- 20,981
- Location
- I love your hate.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
I prefer known sources but I understand in reporting you can't always get that. Especially when reporting sensative information that puts people lives and/or jobs at risk.
While I agree information that comes from an anonymous source shouldn't be considered as "proof", when did this absolute rejection of all anonymous sources begin? It was always a time honored practice. Entire court cases have been fought over the right to protect one's sources. We are basically telling sources that if they are not willing to lose their job or get sued or go to jail then we aren't even going to listen to what they have to say.
When? when you are a source who is constantly being shown to be lying, wrong, and producing fake news.