• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sean Spicer references imaginary Atlanta terror attack to defend Trump's travel ban

Re: Sean Spicer references imaginary Atlanta terror attack to defend Trump's travel b

... Maggie, are you suggesting there was a secret terror attack in Atlanta that killed people?

Hey, the X-Files might be real. Who knows?
 
Re: Sean Spicer references imaginary Atlanta terror attack to defend Trump's travel b

This ban didn't but it did affect plenty of people. And the precedent it sets (that Trump can and will ban green card carriers from certain countries entering the country - without warning or consultation) certainly could affect me.

Trump does have a responsibility to keep Americans safe, but the actions he took have very little impact on our national security. We have taken in almost 1 million refugees since 2001 and not one of them has committed a terrorist attack. 2 were arrested for planning to travel to Syria and 1 was arrested for having a semblance of a plan, but there's nothing to suggest the 90 day ban makes America safer.

All his ban does is inconvenience honest people. Why do you value security over liberty?

Anyone that has had a debate about guns should recognize the above 2 sentences, and I would hope they would also recognize any hypocrisy they might be showing.



Of course, Trump won. That was the goal and he did it.

But that said, the fact that he didn't win the popular vote means that there are a ginormous block of American voters who don't want Trump as president (more than who did). As much as we have to come to terms with the fact that Trump became President, you're going to have to come to terms with the fact that Trump is going to meet unparalleled resistance. Call us losers if you want, but that's certainly not going to discourage us.

Someone that doesn't vote is de facto voting for the winner. Every citizen should know this. It is elementary math of decision making in groups. No excuses. The same is true of citizens that did not succeed in motivating enough people to vote.

I didn't call anyone a "loser". What I did say was that they were "bad losers". That is less a question of incidental loss. It is a matter of character. And you are right. Bad losers do tend to go on and on kvetching and bad mouthing. So you might be right on there.
 
Re: Sean Spicer references imaginary Atlanta terror attack to defend Trump's travel b

Terrorism is a complex subject, there's an imaginary component.

They are following there Dear Leader in delegitimizing anything that whiffs of dissent, the man truly needs therapy, but so few narcissist seek mental health.
 
Re: Sean Spicer references imaginary Atlanta terror attack to defend Trump's travel b

Someone that doesn't vote is de facto voting for the winner. Every citizen should know this. It is elementary math of decision making in groups. No excuses. The same is true of citizens that did not succeed in motivating enough people to vote.

I didn't call anyone a "loser". What I did say was that they were "bad losers". That is less a question of incidental loss. It is a matter of character. And you are right. Bad losers do tend to go on and on kvetching and bad mouthing. So you might be right on there.

Calling someone a bad loser kinda implies they're a loser.

And as for being a question of character, and bad mouthing? Boo hoo. Find a safe space. People are expressing their right to freedom of speech and expression. Get over it. Your opinion that people's concerns are baseless doesn't invalidate them.
 
Re: Sean Spicer references imaginary Atlanta terror attack to defend Trump's travel b

Sean Spicer invents Atlanta terror attack to defend travel ban - NY Daily News



Incredibly insensitive at a time when we're all still grieving over the Bowling Green massacre.

Not sure why this administration can't call this what it is. Radical imaginary terrorism. What a bunch of PC cowards.

In all seriousness, what happened to the days to when we held administrations to standards. These aren't slips of the tongue, they're blatant lies meant to deceive and mislead the American public, and they're coming at a faster and faster rate.


Atlanta?
 
Re: Sean Spicer references imaginary Atlanta terror attack to defend Trump's travel b

Yeah! The real problem is the people who are pointing out what a terrible president this guy is!

Yep, three weeks into office, surprised you even gave him that much time which of course you didn't
 
Re: Sean Spicer references imaginary Atlanta terror attack to defend Trump's travel b

Hurt no one? Really? Families separated, students unable to return to school ... that's not harm?

109 people were supposedly hurt vs 323 million Americans who could be potentially hurt, yes I see the outrage, 90 days is an eternity to the radicals on the left
 
Re: Sean Spicer references imaginary Atlanta terror attack to defend Trump's travel b

LOL....as usual....the irony is strong with this one today.

Irony? Yep, 90 day TEMPORARY ban is the end of the world for the left. Keep whining and complaining, Disney for that is what you do best and in fact is all that you do
 
Re: Sean Spicer references imaginary Atlanta terror attack to defend Trump's travel b

109 people were supposedly hurt vs 323 million Americans who could be potentially hurt, yes I see the outrage, 90 days is an eternity to the radicals on the left

"323 million Americans who could potentially be hurt" by WHO?
 
Re: Sean Spicer references imaginary Atlanta terror attack to defend Trump's travel b

Yep, three weeks into office, surprised you even gave him that much time which of course you didn't

This is laughable. The guy waltzes into office, signs a whole bunch of awful and legally ... dubious EOs, and it's all the fault of those mean liberals who just won't give the guy a chance.
 
Re: Sean Spicer references imaginary Atlanta terror attack to defend Trump's travel b

Little off topic but as a conservative I don't think Spencer is the right guy for this job. Trump needs someone much better, maybe Bush's former press secretary, that hot blond babe.. :)

Tim-
 
Re: Sean Spicer references imaginary Atlanta terror attack to defend Trump's travel b

OMG, the end of the world!! I tell you, the hell with national security because we cannot inconvenience anyone, can we

Do you need a hand with those goalposts? They look heavy.
 
Re: Sean Spicer references imaginary Atlanta terror attack to defend Trump's travel b

Con and his alternate facts again. Why do you continue to believe that 911 occurred on Clinton's watch. If you look at a calendar con...you will see that your hero had been President for almost a year. But hey....don't let the truth get in the way of your alternate facts.

Planning and training sure did, December 1998 PDB
 
Re: Sean Spicer references imaginary Atlanta terror attack to defend Trump's travel b

"323 million Americans who could potentially be hurt" by WHO?

911 cost the US Taxpayers over 1 TRILLION dollars according to the GAO and 3000 lives. The training was done in 2000 and we were warned by the 12/98 PDB to Clinton
 
Re: Sean Spicer references imaginary Atlanta terror attack to defend Trump's travel b

109 people were supposedly hurt vs 323 million Americans who could be potentially hurt, yes I see the outrage, 90 days is an eternity to the radicals on the left

323 million people hurt how? Some one going to sink us into the ocean?
 
Re: Sean Spicer references imaginary Atlanta terror attack to defend Trump's travel b

This is laughable. The guy waltzes into office, signs a whole bunch of awful and legally ... dubious EOs, and it's all the fault of those mean liberals who just won't give the guy a chance.

Didn't bother you when Obama did it so payback is hell. Yes all pro growth EO's has to drive people like you crazy
 
Re: Sean Spicer references imaginary Atlanta terror attack to defend Trump's travel b

Yep, three weeks into office, surprised you even gave him that much time which of course you didn't

So how long should people wait before objecting to concrete actions taken by a president? How long did you wait before objecting to actions taken by Obama?
 
Re: Sean Spicer references imaginary Atlanta terror attack to defend Trump's travel b

Do you need a hand with those goalposts? They look heavy.

the fact that you want to ignore is that 109 people were inconvenienced and this is a TEMPORARY BAN
 
Re: Sean Spicer references imaginary Atlanta terror attack to defend Trump's travel b

911 cost the US Taxpayers over 1 TRILLION dollars according to the GAO and 3000 lives. The training was done in 2000 and we were warned by the 12/98 PDB to Clinton

How many of the 9/11 hijackers were from countries listed on Trump's travel ban?
 
Re: Sean Spicer references imaginary Atlanta terror attack to defend Trump's travel b

How many of the 9/11 hijackers were from countries listed on Trump's travel ban?

How many were on the list prior to 9/11? There wasn't a travel ban and should have been. Did you read the 12/98 PDB? Pretty clear to me and also pretty clear what Clinton did about it
 
Re: Sean Spicer references imaginary Atlanta terror attack to defend Trump's travel b

Didn't bother you when Obama did it so payback is hell. Yes all pro growth EO's has to drive people like you crazy

Did you know that the EOs people are objecting to are different from the EOs Obama issued? It is true!! See, EOs have words on them, that form sentences, and those sentences have meaning. When Trump signs Eos that do good things, I will compliment him on it, and when he signs stupid EOs I will criticize him for it. That is how things work for people not blinded by partisanship...
 
Re: Sean Spicer references imaginary Atlanta terror attack to defend Trump's travel b

How many were on the list prior to 9/11? There wasn't a travel ban and should have been. Did you read the 12/98 PDB? Pretty clear to me and also pretty clear what Clinton did about it

You're just babbling at this point.
 
Re: Sean Spicer references imaginary Atlanta terror attack to defend Trump's travel b

Did you know that the EOs people are objecting to are different from the EOs Obama issued? It is true!! See, EOs have words on them, that form sentences, and those sentences have meaning. When Trump signs Eos that do good things, I will compliment him on it, and when he signs stupid EOs I will criticize him for it. That is how things work for people not blinded by partisanship...

The EO's Obama issued used USC 1182 as their authority. How were they different? Oh, wait, Obama did it...yeah, ok.
 
Back
Top Bottom