• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Travel Ban Blocked

Re: Federal Judge Temporarily Blocks Donald Trump’s Travel Ban

True...so it'll be interesting to see how this plays out. My guess is the judge will win.

He should be impeached, because he acting unconstitutionally.
 
Re: Federal Judge Temporarily Blocks Donald Trump’s Travel Ban

He should be impeached, because he acting unconstitutionally.

Yes the trump/Bannon cabal should be impeached, I agree apdst .
 
Seem's like this is going to out just how politicized our judicial system is....Wonder if any of these judges (some Obama appointees) will be impeached over this?
 
Re: Federal Judge Temporarily Blocks Donald Trump’s Travel Ban

He should be impeached, because he acting unconstitutionally.

Be patient...Trump will be impeached soon enough. :2razz:
 
Re: Federal Judge Temporarily Blocks Donald Trump’s Travel Ban

Be patient...Trump will be impeached soon enough. :2razz:

Ok. :lamo
 
Re: Federal Judge Temporarily Blocks Donald Trump’s Travel Ban

Yes the trump/Bannon cabal should be impeached, I agree apdst .

On what charge?
 
Seem's like this is going to out just how politicized our judicial system is....Wonder if any of these judges (some Obama appointees) will be impeached over this?

This isn't going to go the way the Libbos want.
 
Not unexpected. Trump is learning, as Obama before him, you can't executive order up a law, particularly an unconstitutional one. Stand by for response (or temper tantrum) in 140 characters or less.

I'm lazy. Can someone point me to the actual argument the judge used to justify this? CNN, showing their typical lack of journalistic integrity, failed to provide that.
 
A Seattle judge doesn’t set our immigration policy. Judge has zero enforcement power over the executive branch - ask Chief Justice Marshall if you don’t believe me, LOL!!
 
A Seattle judge doesn’t set our immigration policy. Judge has zero enforcement power over the executive branch - ask Chief Justice Marshall if you don’t believe me, LOL!!

As much as I think this judge is wrong (unless the reasons are valid/still waiting), I'd rather Trump not push this through just because the S.C. has no enforcement power.
 
EO has already been declared lawful by the DOJ. And the US Code gives the President, not Judges, authority over immigration. His ruling is moot.
 
8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens
(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or non-immigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.

Next question.
 
8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens
(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or non-immigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.

Next question.
Do you have a link the the reasoning the judge used for this suspension? CNN failed to provide it because they're the propoganda arm of the DNC.
 
8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens
(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or non-immigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.

Next question.

Man, I wish i could hit like twice...lol
 
Do you have a link the the reasoning the judge used for this suspension? CNN failed to provide it because they're the propoganda arm of the DNC.

The judge doesn't want to say too much, because he knows he's over-stepped his constitutional authority.
 
If the Court over-rules Trump, the Sally Yates firing is going to produce an interesting conundrum I think.

I keep hearing people say this. Is this really unprecedented behavior?
 
It's not a few people who are affected, over 100,000 with visas have been prevented from travelling.

Very true. The 109 the administration claimed were affected was the biggest lie since Trump took office.
 
Very true. The 109 the administration claimed were affected was the biggest lie since Trump took office.

8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens
(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or non-immigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.

My thanks again to volsrock....
 
EO has already been declared lawful by the DOJ. And the US Code gives the President, not Judges, authority over immigration. His ruling is moot.

Dept of Justice said it wasn't legal and the acting AG was fired for it. Her replacement hasn't filed a brief yet.

The Constitution gives the States authority to sue the federal government and it gives the court authority to see if it has standing....which apparently this one does.

The judge said something about the WH or EO in violation of the due process clause when it canceled all those visas.
 
Very true. The 109 the administration claimed were affected was the biggest lie since Trump took office.

I remember Kellyanne saying that. She is such a nasty person. She was saying a bunch of nasty stuff and comes off angry.
 
Dept of Justice said it wasn't legal and the acting AG was fired for it. Her replacement hasn't filed a brief yet.

The Constitution gives the States authority to sue the federal government and it gives the court authority to see if it has standing....which apparently this one does.

The judge said something about the WH or EO in violation of the due process clause when it canceled all those visas.

It is my understanding that this was because the original EO included those with permanent resident status, that has since been resolved, so then it is NOT in violation due to this...

8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens
(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or non-immigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.
 
Back
Top Bottom