- Joined
- Mar 11, 2009
- Messages
- 41,104
- Reaction score
- 12,202
- Location
- South Carolina
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
let's go with tyrant
"Soft tyranny".... So, tyrant? so what? Does that upset you?
let's go with tyrant
Are you saying you have knowledge of at least some Trump murders?
well, it was how things were done in the cold war, against a much greater enemy than NK, so it must have been somewhat effective. it's obvious to me that he means actually hits another country with weapons, not a test of either.. although those might lead to further sanctions, if that is possible.
I'm saying it's quite telling that you only insulted someone who's killed no one, but not two entities that have killed thousands.
Yes I insulted our narcissistic, unhinged president. I did a quick search of the forum and found that you never called anyone out that referred to President Obama as "Dear Leader", even though that was an insult that equated him with the murderous totalitarian Kim Jong Il. Obviously this reverence you have for the office of the presidency is newfound.
The world has become a scarey place. And it's always the same few countries. For being the most powerful country on the planet, haven't done a very good job of containing these people. And in the case of Iran, we finance them.
I never withheld an insult from a couple of mass murderers that I mentioned in the same sentence, like you did. Now if you have anymore diversions, please submit them to someone else. Your disingenuousness and hate for our President over a murderous Korean dictator is duly noted.
How do we finance them Maggie?
How much money did we release to them just recently? A few hundred billion in cash, wasn't it? And here we are wondering what sanctions to impose yet again.
The irony here is laughable. You had no problem calling our former president the same name a murderous Korean dictator was referred by, yet all of a sudden you all kinds of respect for the office today.
To be clear Maggie. That was not our money. It was their money. We "froze" it for a bargaining tool to get them to come to the table regarding nuclear development. To which they did. And THEIR money was unfrozen.
Look at it like this. You and I are at a party. You've had a few too many and I don't like that. So I take your car keys away from you. The following day, after you have sobered up, I give you your car keys back.
Did I give you a car? Of course not. It was your car to begin with.
Now, other than letting them have their own money, how are we, government/taxpayers, financing Iran?
I also spent a lot of time calling out the Korean man-child. But maybe you're a secret admirer, I don't know.
OK wait a second. You admit then that you recognize that Kim Jung Il was a murderous sociopathic dictator, yet you still no problem with President Obama being called the same name.
As a side note, no, I do not admire the dictator of North Korea.
OK wait a second. You admit then that you recognize that Kim Jung Il was a murderous sociopathic dictator, yet you still no problem with President Obama being called the same name.
As a side note, no, I do not admire the dictator of North Korea.
I did know this was their money. And that is what I meant by financing Iran. We returned the money, though. And here we are again looking for sanctions. They have proven their dishonesty, imo. And I'd bet we knew they were dishonest going in...