• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump eyes 10 percent spending cuts and 20% Slash in Federal workers

Then he will have to reorganize the administration considerably. The easiest way would be to stop government from producing private goods and non productive subsidies. 20% is actually not enough.

I think this is the first step of many promises that Trump will keep to do what the left doesn't want, making America great again
 
I think this is the first step of many promises that Trump will keep to do what the left doesn't want, making America great again

The proof of this pudding will be in the eating, of course. And public officials have a sizable bipartisan lobby.
 

10% of total federal spending? Discretionary spending is only about 1/3 of total federal spending and military spending is over half of that "discretion", which Trump has vowed to increase. In order to get a 10% total federal spending reduction from less than 1/6 of the federal budget would require some very massive cuts - on the order of 45% (or more) from non-military discretionary spending.

That 10% federal spending cut "promise" is going to be mission impossible to get congress critters to accept. Like many Trumpisms, the lack of details makes this yet another vague policy "goal". We will soon see a Trump budget that will be largely ignored by congress as they continue to borrow and spend their way to re-election.
 
So add 280,400 more Americans to the unemployment rolls?
Are they not capable of finding another job?? The left is telling us the economy is fine, so what's the problem??? If they are not bright enough to get another job in this " good" economy why would I want them working for me?? Yes they work for me. I'm called a tax payer!!

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk
 
So add 280,400 more Americans to the unemployment rolls?

No. Offer them the jobs the illegal aliens will be vacating. Also, with the billions US Corporations are pouring into new facilities, lots of good paying jobs will become available.

Not to worry.
 
So add 280,400 more Americans to the unemployment rolls?


Excuse me. The number would be 560,800 more employees to the unemployment rolls.

Nope. Into more efficient jobs.
These jobs are not "efficient" by what standard? And are you guaranteeing them a job?

Are they not capable of finding another job??
I dont know. Thats a silly and empty question.

The left is telling us the economy is fine, so what's the problem???
We are? The collective whole of "the left" is saying that?

If they are not bright enough to get another job in this " good" economy why would I want them working for me?? Yes they work for me. I'm called a tax payer!!
And you want to fire 560,800 employees, because..... Why?
 
10% of total federal spending? Discretionary spending is only about 1/3 of total federal spending and military spending is over half of that "discretion", which Trump has vowed to increase. In order to get a 10% total federal spending reduction from less than 1/6 of the federal budget would require some very massive cuts - on the order of 45% (or more) from non-military discretionary spending.

That 10% federal spending cut "promise" is going to be mission impossible to get congress critters to accept. Like many Trumpisms, the lack of details makes this yet another vague policy "goal". We will soon see a Trump budget that will be largely ignored by congress as they continue to borrow and spend their way to re-election.

I would cut every federal spending program discretionary or otherwise by 1% a years for 10 years

Even welfare, social security and Medicare
 
So add 280,400 more Americans to the unemployment rolls?

You never did understand economic activity and what 400 billion added back to the US economy will do to that activity. 10% spending cut=400 billion not required from the taxpayers to pay for federal spending
 
i like the concept
now for the execution

which 10% of government spending and which 20% of the federal workforce gets cut? it IS there to be cut, but i predict he gets it wrong
We can make massive cuts to the CIA and our military spending. That would take up many of those cuts right there.
 
We can make massive cuts to the CIA and our military spending. That would take up many of those cuts right there.

There should no larger. It's to military spending than to any other program
 
We can make massive cuts to the CIA and our military spending. That would take up many of those cuts right there.

he campaigned on expanding the military

now, i would not be surprised that he would flip flop on that expansion commitment, but to be so visible doing so is not tRump-like
 
We can make massive cuts to the CIA and our military spending. That would take up many of those cuts right there.

A great start would be to return all social engineering programs back to the states where they belong, take Medicare and SS totally off budget along with the payroll taxes that fund them. Cut drastically the Department of Education, Transportation, and Energy. Undoing the PC model the left has built is going to be fun to watch
 
i like the concept
now for the execution

which 10% of government spending and which 20% of the federal workforce gets cut? it IS there to be cut, but i predict he gets it wrong
An aid with at least an elementary school grasp of 'math,' probably mentioned to him that his 20-30% Tax cuts would increase the dreaded "deficits" he talked about, so he needed to cut "spending."
Hark!
 
he campaigned on expanding the military

now, i would not be surprised that he would flip flop on that expansion commitment, but to be so visible doing so is not tRump-like

Would be great seeing us return to the true role of the Federal govt. which is to PROVIDE FOR THE COMMON DEFENSE and return all social engineering programs back to the states where they belong and where the consequences for failure are paid for
 
Excuse me. The number would be 560,800 more employees to the unemployment rolls.


These jobs are not "efficient" by what standard? And are you guaranteeing them a job?


I dont know. Thats a silly and empty question.


We are? The collective whole of "the left" is saying that?


And you want to fire 560,800 employees, because..... Why?
How about government is to big and going bankrupt!! How about that?? Do you really think there is no room to cut people in government???? I know, the left thinks the government is a model of efficiency and there would never be any dead weight needing cut.....

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk
 
I would cut every federal spending program discretionary or otherwise by 1% a years for 10 years

Even welfare, social security and Medicare

Name one congress critter that would cut military pensions, federal pensions, Medicare or Social Security. You have made some outrageous claims but this one takes the cake. You can rest assured that federal spending will go up in every year of the Trump term.
 
he campaigned on expanding the military

now, i would not be surprised that he would flip flop on that expansion commitment, but to be so visible doing so is not tRump-like

It will be impossible for trump to keep all the promises he made

The important thing what he does manage to do

And in the meantime anti trumpsters can be sharpening their knives
 
Back
Top Bottom