- Joined
- Jun 23, 2005
- Messages
- 32,482
- Reaction score
- 22,730
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
The father of five offered a personal example of how this shift might play out. He says his youngest son fell and injured his arm. Not sure if it was sprained or broken, he and his wife decided to wait until the next morning to take the 10-year-old to the doctor's office, instead of going to the emergency room that night. The arm was broken."We took every precaution but decided to go in the next morning (because of) the cost difference," Huizenga said. "If he had been more seriously injured, we would have taken him in. ... When it (comes to) those type of things, do you keep your child home from school and take him the next morning to the doctor because of a cold or a flu, versus take him into the emergency room? If you don't have a cost difference, you'll make different decisions."
Son's broken arm: Bill Huizenga says people must be responsible for own health care costs | MLive.com
For ****s sake what is wrong with this guy? The larger point I think is a good one in that yes some people over utilize the emergency room taking for obvious non-emergencies like a cold or very minor injuries that you could either go to urgent care for or simply wait to get in with your GP. Furthermore, I watch our medical spending due to our coinsurance and deductibles, so I don't understand why others would not as well. That said, who in the hell does not think a broken arm is an emergency? Who let's their kid sweat it out in pain all night until they finally decide to take them in the next morning? A broken limb hurts like hell until its set. Moreover, it requires a hospital visit anyway so you are not saving any money by waiting until the next morning. He basically confessed to child neglect in his terrible example.