• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Electors won't be briefed on russian hacking

haymarket said:
Of course, you are ready to present verifiable information support that claim of alleged fact in your next post --- right?
Click to expand...

Were there weapons of mass destruction in Iraq? The answer is no.

I think it's remarkable that you have no interest in seeing the verifiable information that Russia, acting under the orders of Putin, demanded that his private band of hackers hack the DNC e-mails in order to help Donald Trump. Instead "a secret report that may or may not exist, coming from anonymous sources that may not even exist, are stating that there is concrete evidence that Russia is guilty. Yet this information cannot under any circumstance be presented to The House of Representatives. lol ok.

Nevermind that the DNC wasn't even hacked at all, it was a leak. If the CIA is calling it a "hack" when this was a "leak" then the CIA has discredited themselves beyond repair. Granted this is all MSM noise anyway: the CIA has not actually said anything at all. It's the MSM presenting fake news.
 
reinoe said:
Were there weapons of mass destruction in Iraq? The answer is no.
Click to expand...

While I agree with you about the WMD claim - that is not the issue you were challenged to provide proof for.

Quote Originally Posted by reinoe View Post
Which goes a long way to explaining why most of it is wrong.
Click to expand...

You do understand what the word MOST means - right?
 
haymarket said:
While I agree with you about the WMD claim - that is not the issue you were challenged to provide proof for.



You do understand what the word MOST means - right?
Click to expand...

Were the e-mails hacked? No. They were leaked.

I noticed you casually dodged the fact that you want incontrovertible proof from a member online but when it comes to our government making allegations about another country your response is "the information is a secret report from a secret source that can't even be presented to the house of representatives is good enough for me!!!". Surely you see how duplicitous that looks.
 
Last edited:
Abbazorkzog said:
:lol: You didn't just seriously accuse me of being a Trump supporter did you?

:lamo

I think you did.

:lamo
Click to expand...

EnigmaO01 said:
Sure you are. If you're not against him you're for him. LOL
Click to expand...

Let me help. This should be fun. This is just for contrast.
Abbazorkzog = not Trump supporter
NonoBaddog = Trump supporter
Abbazorkzog = not Trump supporter
Nonobaddog = Trump Supporter
 
NonoBadDog said:
Let me help. This should be fun. This is just for contrast.
Abbazorkzog = not Trump supporter
NonoBaddog = Trump supporter
Abbazorkzog = not Trump supporter
Nonobaddog = Trump Supporter
Click to expand...

:popcorn: :lamo
 
EnigmaO01 said:
You might want to do some catching up.
Click to expand...

'Look, I am not going to start making comments at this point. I haven’t commented on this publicly because of the job I do,' Kerry said. 'I’m not going to comment on anonymous reports from intelligence officials that are not identified that have quotes around the concept of intelligence officials.'
Click to expand...

 
reinoe said:
Were the e-mails hacked? No. They were leaked.

I noticed you casually dodged the fact that you want incontrovertible proof from a member online but when it comes to our government making allegations about another country your response is "the information is a secret report from a secret source that can't even be presented to the house of representatives is good enough for me!!!". Surely you see how duplicitous that looks.
Click to expand...

You still have yet to prove what you said that I called you on.

Quote Originally Posted by reinoe View Post
Which goes a long way to explaining why most of it is wrong.
Click to expand...

Why is your evidence so absent and why are you trying to move the goal posts away from your claim of fact?
 
RetiredUSN said:
Speculation isn't fact, no matter how much you wish it to be.
Click to expand...

What does that have to do with how our intelligence agencies make their judgments?
 
jimbo said:
Do you have a point?
Click to expand...

That I was right about them meeting next week and it was not an event which already happened.


Quote Originally Posted by jimbo View Post
The important decision has been made. And not by the Russians.
Click to expand...




Is there something my correcting you which confused you?
 
There was no hacking in the first place. Wikileaks has already said they got the information from someone inside the DNC, not Russia.
 
Abbazorkzog said:
ELECTORS WON'T BE BRIEFED ON RUSSIAN HACKING

Electoral College members who wanted an intelligence briefing on Russian interference in the presidential election are out of luck.
On Friday, the office of the Director of National Intelligence said it's not ready to release new information regarding the Russia's interference in the 2016 election.

It said members of the intelligence community are conducting a review ordered by President Barack Obama of every instance of electoral interference dating back to the 2008 presidential election. Since the review includes classified information, the office can't provide additional information right now.​

So, either this isn't as big of a deal as the Clinton camp is making it out to be, or the Obama administration itself is involved with the Kremlin to some embarrassing degree or another. I'm going with the former, in other words - just more fabulist and highfalutin election-year drama.

Click to expand...

They have also refused to brief the House Intelligence Committee, which they are required by law to do, which is even telling. People should be thrown in jail for that.
 
jamesrage said:
I am going with the claims of Russian hacking are nothing more than liberal conspiracy loon nonsense meant to try de-legitimize Trump's presidency. Because if they had something credible then they would show it.
Click to expand...

I'm sure there is something out there but it's no where near the level that is being reported in the fake news.
 
Henrin said:
There was no hacking in the first place. Wikileaks has already said they got the information from someone inside the DNC, not Russia.
Click to expand...

And when mommies tell their little ones that babies come from cabbage patches - is that also to be believed?
 
haymarket said:
You still have yet to prove what you said that I called you on.



Why is your evidence so absent and why are you trying to move the goal posts away from your claim of fact?
Click to expand...
I've already proven my case.
There were no WMD's in Iraq.
There was no hack of the DNC.
 
haymarket said:
And when mommies tell their little ones that babies come from cabbage patches - is that also to be believed?
Click to expand...

Has the CIA proven themselves trustworthy when I wasn't looking? No.
Have they have be proven to be a liar in the past? Yes.

Has Wikileaks shown themselves to be trustworthy? Yes.
Has Wikileaks ever been showed to be lying? No.

Who should I believe? The proven liar or the guy that has been known to tell the truth? Hmmm..
 
reinoe said:
I've already proven my case.
There were no WMD's in Iraq.
There was no hack of the DNC.
Click to expand...

So you DO NOT know what the word MOST means then.

Quote Originally Posted by reinoe View Post
Which goes a long way to explaining why most of it is wrong.
Click to expand...
 
haymarket said:
Nothing like supplying people with the information they might need to make an important decision. :doh:roll:
Click to expand...

You don't have admit it to me, but privately you must know this is nothing more than a political stunt

All but one of the electors demanding a briefing are committed to Hillary anyway

Also, the one trump elector is a fraud and a liar

And few if any have a security clearance to be given access to classified material
 
haymarket said:
And when mommies tell their little ones that babies come from cabbage patches - is that also to be believed?
Click to expand...

Kinda like how the CIA performed a "secret report" and "anonymous sources" say that it was definitely Russia under orders from Putin. Is that story to be believed too? Because I trust a named official, from a named source, more than what the CIA is dishing out right now.

It's likely that the reason why the leaker isn't coming forward is because they've already been killed.

Seth Richard Cohen assassinated.
Detectives from the Metropolitan Police Department’s Homicide Branch are investigating a fatal shooting that occurred in the 2100 block of Flagler Place, Northwest on Sunday, July 10, 2016.

At approximately 4:19 am, members of the Fifth District were patrolling the area when they heard gunshots. Upon arrival on the scene, members located an adult male victim conscious and breathing, and suffering from gunshot wounds. The victim was transported to an area hospital, where he succumbed to his injuries and was pronounced dead.

The decedent has been identified as 27-year-old Seth Conrad Rich, of Northwest, DC.
Click to expand...
 
reinoe said:
Kinda like how the CIA performed a "secret report" and "anonymous sources" say that it was definitely Russia under orders from Putin. Is that story to be believed too? Because I trust a named official, from a named source, more than what the CIA is dishing out right now.

It's likely that the reason why the leaker isn't coming forward is because they've already been killed.

Seth Richard Cohen assassinated.
Click to expand...

Exactly. It is far more likely that person that leaked the information was killed for it months ago.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom