Re: Bipartisan Senate Group Calls for Probe of Russian Hacking in US
No, certainly not - but an allegation doesn't automatically amount to reality.
This is where you should have ended your post, because it's evident that you don't care to read into the issue because it could be poised as something critical towards your Oompa Loompa Jesus, Donald Small hands.
These are not allegations. the report is an officially cited, recorded and gathered account of the Russian government aiding in hacking into Clinton, and the DNC's email servers to influence the outcome of the election. This is all confirmed by the CIA and
seventeen other intelligence groups. In the intel community, a consensus like that doesn't happen by accident or chance. You know how much pride intelligence gatherers and analysts have in their work? Do you believe that the top analysts from 17 different groups would report the same thing if it were a fabrication.
Certainly, the CIA should not be making determinations around the veracity or integrity of US elections or candidates,
You're right, the CIA should in no way, shape, or form be critical and target potential insider threats to the country. :roll: Glib aside, that isn't what's happening here. The intelligence world isn't on a witch hunt for Donald Trump. They're on a witch hunt because of the
overwhelming amount of evidence pointing towards the Russians hacking the US. But you don't see this as an issue, because you don't think this is about the hackers, you think this is all about Tonald Drump.
just as the US military should not be securing the ballot boxes.
Debatable. The National Guard can be deployed for a varying amount of reasons like natural disasters, riots, and just general security. If the state felt so strongly that voters and election boxes could be tampered with the state can deploy their guard units to post security.
When I think of the purpose of Posse Comitatus, it's meant to ensure that the US military doesn't get point its guns at the American people.
We generally do our best to not point guns at civilians as a general rule. And again, the chance of that ever happening is rather slim.
By extension, I think the same principle should apply to the CIA, so that its resources are not used for partisan political purposes in challenging electoral verdicts.
Just when I thought I couldn't groan any harder, you go out and produce enough dribble onto the keyboard to produce this.
Ugh.
What do you the CIA's general mission is exactly? Do you think they just sit around try and busts terrorists by looking through your Emails and text messages you share with your friend Brad from your pickup basketball team at the YMCA? They're tasked with handling gathering and analyzing on foreign nations. Through whatever methods they had at their disposal, they came to discover the Russians demonstrably did everything they could to get Trump elected as President. I can't believe the spark plug and the dead hamster rotting in broken wheel of a brain is unable to process that.
Indeed, the FBI is the adjudicating agency for law enforcement not the CIA
That's because the FBI is a federal law enforcement agency. Meanwhile the CIA is a
intelligence agency. They're job isn't to arrest, or allege a crime. They gather, and then they report.
- and I can't help but notice that some people here (the anti-Trump people, obviously) want to disregard the FBI's pronouncements, and do an end-run around them by now invoking the CIA.
Well genius, the FBI concluded that Trump wasn't working directly with the Russian government. That isn't what the CIA and others are alleging. If it wasn't any more obvious you are ignorant on the issue, this was the final nail in the coffin.
This is after they invoked the need for recounts, which haven't worked to overturn the election result. This is after they've proposed that electors from the electoral college not vote according to party affiliation. This is after they've complained that the Electoral College is anti-democratic and needs to be scrapped (presumably they wouldn't have cared if Hillary had won it).
The CIA also made these conclusions on Russian interference days for the election but sat on it till after the American people voted. Why do you think that happened?
So I just keep hearing this rigmarole/litany of complaint after complaint about this election by those who've lost it.
I didn't lose the election, the corrupt DNC didn't even let my guy run in a fair race.