• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump-Taiwan call breaks US policy stance[W:117]

Re: Trump-Taiwan call breaks US policy stance

He called Obama?

Did she? Ever?

Why do you assume the President of Taiwan is a man?
 
Re: Trump-Taiwan call breaks US policy stance

Did she? Ever?

Why do you assume the President of Taiwan is a man?

Because most of the presidents in the world are.
 
Re: Trump-Taiwan call breaks US policy stance

Not this one. Shoulda read the OP

It is irrelevant to the topic what gender the president of taiwan is. I was mistaken but you of all people are about the last person that should be pointing out anyone elses errors. :lol:
 
Re: Trump-Taiwan call breaks US policy stance

Trump is setting up the world to stop liberAls. Can anyone understand yet?

Just what we hired him for!!
 
Re: Trump-Taiwan call breaks US policy stance

It is irrelevant to the topic what gender the president of taiwan is. I was mistaken but you of all people are about the last person that should be pointing out anyone elses errors. :lol:

You assumed the President of Taiwan is a man because you believe a woman can't handle the job.
 
Re: Trump-Taiwan call breaks US policy stance

You assumed the President of Taiwan is a man because you believe a woman can't handle the job.

Is that what I think?

There you go again, making crap up about what you think others think.
 
Re: Trump-Taiwan call breaks US policy stance

Is that what I think?

There you go again, making crap up about what you think others think.

Why sure.
 
Re: Trump-Taiwan call breaks US policy stance

Good. You posted as if you needed one.



1) I would like a world where lunatics don't go around actively seeking Armageddon. How's that?

2) "Our communist opponents" is sooooo 1953, y'know? If there's one thing the current Peking regime ain't, it's communist.



Your convictions being that a (by definition) vain attempt to save a small island in the East China Sea is worth blowing up the world. Great.
I repeat: It would piss me off too to see decent Taiwan taken over by the overlords of Peking. It just ain't worth WWIII, that's all.



What would you have done in 1949? And how would it have panned out. (Careful now.)



I confess that this came as a surprise to me. But I don't attribute to her the stupidity of thinking that the US can actually save Taiwan if push comes to shove. Cuz -- for all your belligerent talk -- it can't.
And I agree with Foaming Don when he says "What was I supposed to do, refuse to answer the phone?"



The US doesn't even recognize Taiwan as a state! And you're calling it an "ally"? Sounds like Eye-Rayy-Ak all over again. Taiwan was long Washington's protégé, while China was militarily weak. Well, it ain't weak these days. Big difference there.
By the way, one Richard Milhous Nixon recognized all this 45 years ago.



Churchill was full of pithy witticisms (many misattributed to him, by the way). Anyway, he wasn't thinking of a small inconsequential island on the other side of the freaking Pacific. And if you're thinking you might get eaten by China (Cantonese cuisine aside), you must have some interesting nightmares.



The US has been THE Bully on the international scene for the past 70 years. My God, if you can even talk about "many many many indignities", you must have one tender ego.



This needs editing. But let me take a crack at it.

"You", compared with Mao's lunacy in the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution? Yes, everything being relative. But Mao has been dead for 40 (count 'em) years, and must be spinning in his grave.

But very often you've been the Bad Guys. Of course I don't expect you ever to comprehend this.

Just curious but you think taking a phone call isn't worth risking World War III, do you really think that could be the result of this call?

What would be worth risking WWIII?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Re: Trump-Taiwan call breaks US policy stance

More dishonesty from you.

This is going to be a long four years for you people. :lamo
 
Re: Trump-Taiwan call breaks US policy stance

This is going to be a long four years for you people. :lamo

Now off-topic gloat trolling. There is an actual topic you know.
 
Re: Trump-Taiwan call breaks US policy stance

Actually a policy of Jimmy Carter who gave in to the Chinese in, I think, 1979.

I guess we could debate that. I was thinking of Taiwan loosing the Chinese seat in the UN to the PRC.
 
Re: Trump-Taiwan call breaks US policy stance

China's military is not in any way shape or form superior to the US military, despite what they might think.

Did I say it was? It's just that Taiwan is a hell of a lot closer to China (and effing far from the US). Like it or not, this makes a HUGE difference.

Shades of "Do You Want to Die For Danzig" may appeal to some people, but most Americans frown upon letting a bully get away with what amounts to highway robbery.

Sounds good. But you might have noticed: Israel, Pakistan (in Afghanistan), Turkey (with its Kurds), Indonesia circa 1965, any number of Latin American tinpot dictators with their political opponents, and so on and so on.
No. America has regularly helped the bully get away with highway robbery. So don't tell me it's raining when you're pissing down my leg.

Not allowing guys like Saddam to brutally annex their neighbors is not "bullying".

Oh, is that all I meant? Grateful for the guidance about what I meant. No, I meant a hundred different examples, from Chile to the Philippines.

And gosh, thanks for the "brutally". That really helped me to understand reality.
And here I thought you could not just go ahead and slant-drill in Texas or Oklahoma. But I see from your post that Kuwait was blameless as always.

Interesting how standing up to bullies suddenly becomes an issue when oil and the Bush family are involved.

You, Tigerace117, may not have any problems with your home being turned into a radioactive slag-heap over the fate of Taiwan. I beg to differ.

handshake300.jpg
 
Last edited:
Re: Trump-Taiwan call breaks US policy stance

Just curious but you think taking a phone call isn't worth risking World War III, do you really think that could be the result of this call?

What an odd question. I've already defended Foaming Don's right to take the call (haven't I?).

You're gerrymandering my statement that getting into a shooting war over Taiwan is not worth the risk of nuclear Armageddon into an argument that an effing Telephone Call could bring about such an event.

So please. Shame on you.
 
Re: Trump-Taiwan call breaks US policy stance

What a dumb ass.
 
Re: Trump-Taiwan call breaks US policy stance

...

1) I would like a world where lunatics don't go around actively seeking Armageddon. How's that?

2) "Our communist opponents" is sooooo 1953, y'know? If there's one thing the current Peking regime ain't, it's communist.

Your convictions being that a (by definition) vain attempt to save a small island in the East China Sea is worth blowing up the world. Great.
I repeat: It would piss me off too to see decent Taiwan taken over by the overlords of Peking. It just ain't worth WWIII, that's all.


What would you have done in 1949? And how would it have panned out...

I confess that this came as a surprise to me. But I don't attribute to her the stupidity of thinking that the US can actually save Taiwan if push comes to shove. Cuz -- for all your belligerent talk -- it can't.
And I agree with Foaming Don when he says "What was I supposed to do, refuse to answer the phone?"

The US doesn't even recognize Taiwan as a state! And you're calling it an "ally"? Sounds like Eye-Rayy-Ak all over again. Taiwan was long Washington's protégé, while China was militarily weak. Well, it ain't weak these days. Big difference there.
By the way, one Richard Milhous Nixon recognized all this 45 years ago.

Churchill was full of pithy witticisms (many misattributed to him, by the way). Anyway, he wasn't thinking of a small inconsequential island on the other side of the freaking Pacific. And if you're thinking you might get eaten by China (Cantonese cuisine aside), you must have some interesting nightmares.

The US has been THE Bully on the international scene for the past 70 years ...


"You", compared with Mao's lunacy in the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution? Yes, everything being relative. But Mao has been dead for 40 (count 'em) years, and must be spinning in his grave.

But very often you've been the Bad Guys. Of course I don't expect you ever to comprehend this.
You regurgitate history fairly well, you absolutely suck at analysis.

Who is "running around like a lunatic"? You screaming the world war is coming, the world war is coming? So Trump took a phone call, OMG.

You said, "I don't want to see Taiwan invaded. But is it in US interests to go to war with a superpower over this question? I don't think so. It's would just get a hell of a lot of innocent people killed, as usual with the many-many US wars, and as usual the US would limp out of it further weakened. This assuming that it didn't trigger a worldwide nuclear holocaust, which is the Big Danger and what is actually at stake here."

Who is pushing this to the point of a war? US or China? The US has no obligation, certainly not in our or our allies best interests, to back down in the face of an aggressive COMMUNIST regime.

The Chinese communists are not going to push a President Trump because they know he is not a weenie. No WW3, no threat of WW3 unless China actually wants/presses for it. Under those circumstances we accommodate/kick their asses.

YOUR history lesson: actually WW4. Cold War was indeed a world war, the third. Under American guidance, as opposed two under European guidance, the whole world did not suffer such misery, death and destruction. Should be a little more trusting of your protector. Not only saved your asses then, protects those same asses as we speak. Remember the trip wires there in Europe. We gave our promise, as a ally, to come to your aid. Will do the same with Taiwan. Think Europeans are the only ones deserving? All free peoples are worth saving.

"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." - Winston Churchill

When I write the book on 1949, I'll send you a copy. If smart, one doesn't wait until 1949, waiting until the game is over to start playing is not the way to win.

For all your hand wringing, China is not going to do a damn thing about Taiwan.

Taiwan= a friend, has been whether officially recognized or not. Still a free state? Think its because China doesn't want her...

Nixon was smart in many ways, cunning internationally playing the communists off against each other. Not omniscient and we still defended our buddies from the PRC, else they would now be PRC. We don't give up allies as fast as you folks. Bit more staunch, steadfast and loyal apparently. Unswerving support of our allies is our style.Lesson maybe your side of the pond should ponder

As a happy guy, I have few nightmares.

With alliess like you, who needs enemies? We save your ass, free your ass, help rebuild your ass then continue to protect your ass and you call us bullies. I'll be polite, not tell you/those that feel [ cannot really call it thinking] like you where they can stick it.

Defend the idea that we, the US,are the bad guys. Lets hear the vomit rolling around inside. Use your knowledge of history. Don't worry, I will be here to correct you.
 
Re: Trump-Taiwan call breaks US policy stance

Did I say it was? It's just that Taiwan is a hell of a lot closer to China (and effing far from the US). Like it or not, this makes a HUGE difference.



Sounds good. But you might have noticed: Israel, Pakistan (in Afghanistan), Turkey (with its Kurds), Indonesia circa 1965, any number of Latin American tinpot dictators with their political opponents, and so on and so on.
No. America has regularly helped the bully get away with highway robbery. So don't tell me it's raining when you're pissing down my leg.



Oh, is that all I meant? Grateful for the guidance about what I meant. No, I meant a hundred different examples, from Chile to the Philippines.

And gosh, thanks for the "brutally". That really helped me to understand reality.
And here I thought you could not just go ahead and slant-drill in Texas or Oklahoma. But I see from your post that Kuwait was blameless as always.

Interesting how standing up to bullies suddenly becomes an issue when oil and the Bush family are involved.

You, Tigerace117, may not have any problems with your home being turned into a radioactive slag-heap over the fate of Taiwan. I beg to differ.

View attachment 67210695

We import most of our oil from the hostile and violently nation of.....uh.....Canada. So thanks for confirming that you don't know much about American foreign policy. It's an easy mistake to make.

Where Does America Get Oil? You May Be Surprised : NPR

The US has sent a carrier into the Taiwan Strait before. Surprisingly enough, we have this thing called "basing rights" which means our fleet doesn't have to sail from Hawaii all the way across the ocean. Germany is closer to Belgium then the US is. If Germany were to decide to annex Belgium, you wouldn't have any complaints, right?

Tell ya what--- you get the Palestinians to stop whipping themselves into a frenzy and glorifying ever rocket attack or suicide bomber, and once they aren't actively conducting an insurgency we'll see about letting them have a state, hmm?

Indonesia circa 1965 is not Indonesia today. And under Erdogan, Turkey has pretty much drifted away from the US.

Are you denying there were communist guerillas in those countries? Who were every night as bad as the governments?

Oh look at that. Your trying to blame tiny Kuwait for Saddam's aggression. Charming.

You may not have a problem with the destruction of a nation and the imposition of tyranny, but I do.
 
Last edited:
Re: Trump-Taiwan call breaks US policy stance

"Taiwan-friendly campaign staff"? As opposed to ..... what? Scared ****less "former Asia director at the White House national security council, Evan Medeiros,"?

Bolton. The guy who forgot to mention he was on the Taiwan payroll when giving evidence to a senate committee supporting... Taiwan.

Some adult thought on events:

"...Though the triangle between the U.S., China, and Taiwan sometimes flares up, the general goal of all three has been to maintain the fragile status quo. By speaking to President Tsai, and praising U.S. relations with Taiwan, Trump threatens to upset that delicate balance. Reaction to the call was immediate and, for the most part, aghast.


“The Chinese leadership will see this as a highly provocative action, of historic proportions,” Evan Medeiros, former Asia director at the White House National Security Council, told the FT. “Regardless if it was deliberate or accidental, this phone call will fundamentally change China’s perceptions of Trump’s strategic intentions for the negative. With this kind of move, Trump is setting a foundation of enduring mistrust and strategic competition for U.S.-China relations.” ..."

https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/12/trump-taiwan/509474/
 
Re: Trump-Taiwan call breaks US policy stance

Can you name even one country that has such a mandate?? If you can't, then possibly you're missing the statehood mark by about a mile here.



Meaning that Peking -- as a permanent member of the Security Council -- has a veto on that. So what you're really saying is that Taiwan is not recognized as a state by Peking. Well ... it'd be mighty odd if it were.

So it isn't "the U.N." ---- which is guided by its charter, which was dictated by the Big Powerful States ---- that is refusing to recognize Taiwan. It's Peking. Period.



They aren't nearly stupid enough to entertain such dreams.



What kind of cheap talk is this? The subject is much too serious for that.



What -- if Taiwan held a referendum? It would be perceived as a grave provocation, that's for sure.



This works both ways. It's one thing to impose boycotts if they won't really affect you. But as long as China remains the Workshop of the World, Western voters may consider cheap widgets to be more important than what happens to the freaking Taiwanese (whoever they are).

China is already in choppy economic waters, so perhaps you're right about them not invading. But that also works both ways (see Galtieri). If you're in economic difficulty and therefore facing trouble from your own population, play the Nationalism Card and go invade someplace you've always claimed anyway.

The Taiwanese currently have a peaceful relationship with Peking. If I were Taiwanese leader and Donald was on the line, I'd refuse to pick up the phone.

I don't do long, multi-quote posts...they usually just end up in a mess.

I will say that Quebec with only a few thousand more votes during it's 1995 referendum was prepared to unilaterally declare independence from Canada. And both the Donetsk region and The Crimea voted well over 80% to leave the Ukraine (and join Russia).
I cannot speak for the past. But in this day and age, you pretty much have to have a referendum to leave a country. Again, if not, almost anyone could just unilaterally declare independence.

You don't think Taiwan should have a referendum? Well I do. I think if they ever want international recognition as a nation - it is mandatory. End of story.

We are done here.

Good day.
 
Re: Trump-Taiwan call breaks US policy stance

From where I am if I send a package to China, I address it to China.

If I send a package to Taiwan, I address it to Taiwan.

Also how many products are marked "Made In Taiwan"? They do not say "Made In China".

It is recognized.

It is not recognized by roughly 85% of most countries as an independent country.

You have a problem with that, talk to them...I don't much care.
 
Re: Trump-Taiwan call breaks US policy stance

Way overblown, IMO. She called, he politely took the call. So what? Refusing to take the call would have been worse. China's crying now is just posturing. China is just going to have to get used to a new kind of US President, because Trump is going to be Trump, and I doubt China is going to be dumb enough to overplay their hand in dealing with him and risk ruining their situation in the process.
 
Back
Top Bottom