• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Clinton & Trump aides clash at Harvard forum

Yes, that is what a responsible voter does, especially when the more qualified and experienced candidate is also the more ethical candidate. Normal people expect to pay a price for bringing their car in to the mechanic who has zero experience and a history of scamming his customers, yet people's critical thinking skills go out the door when it comes to politics, a phenomenon I still have yet to understand.

To go with your analogy it's more...
Clinton: your'e going into the shop to repair your car with a known experienced con artist mechanic, who breaks peoples cars all the time....for 30 years.

Trump: Or you have the choice of the guy who is completely new, but passionate, watched tons of youtube videos and car repair stuff of the internet...but used to be repair T.V.s.... hey, he might fix your electronics problem :lol:
 
I say the Leftists are being some big ass cry babies. Just more proof they have no business running the country.

Yup, and they didn't learn a damn thing from that humiliating loss.
 
I don't care who was saying it. The fact that she was experienced, qualified and more ethical is sufficient reason.

She is now very experienced in losing presidential elections. :lamo

She is also very experienced in being a crooked, lying, and getting her underlining to take the fall.
 
Experienced in what? Failure is her experience, along with lies, coverups and just plan stupidity.

First of all, she has forty years of experience. Dismissing that makes you an unserious debater. Second, Trump lies 70% of the time. Thirdly, any malfeasance you accuse her of is equaled or surpassed by Trump. Fourthly, she didn't scam thousands of people out of nearly a quarter billion dollars. Fifthly, she hasn't bragged about committing sexual assault or been accused by multiple victims of sexual assault. Sixthly, racism is not her platform.

You basically took your car in to the mechanic who has zero experience and a long history of scamming his customers, and you shrugged and said, "Well, sure, he butchered my car and charged me thousands of dollars for it, but at least I didn't let the guy with decades of car repair experience work on it."

Well done.
 
I don't care who was saying it. The fact that she was experienced, qualified and more ethical is sufficient reason.

You're conveniently ignoring the source then, and largely because it's so well documented any objection would be silly. She is more experienced than Trump. The nature and quality of that experience with the concomitant results was what was in question.
 
First of all, she has forty years of experience. Dismissing that makes you an unserious debater. Second, Trump lies 70% of the time. Thirdly, any malfeasance you accuse her of is equaled or surpassed by Trump. Fourthly, she didn't scam thousands of people out of nearly a quarter billion dollars. Fifthly, she hasn't bragged about committing sexual assault or been accused by multiple victims of sexual assault. Sixthly, racism is not her platform.

You basically took your car in to the mechanic who has zero experience and a long history of scamming his customers, and you shrugged and said, "Well, sure, he butchered my car and charged me thousands of dollars for it, but at least I didn't let the guy with decades of car repair experience work on it."

Well done.

Yeah, what we need is someone with forty years of experience in being crooked in government to be president. No doubt.
 
To go with your analogy it's more...
Clinton: your'e going into the shop to repair your car with a known experienced con artist mechanic, who breaks peoples cars all the time....for 30 years.

Trump: Or you have the choice of the guy who is completely new, but passionate, watched tons of youtube videos and car repair stuff of the internet...but used to be repair T.V.s.... hey, he might fix your electronics problem :lol:

So as an alternative you took your car in to the guy who's repaired no cars and has a well publicized history of scamming his customers. Good job.
 
The whining is incredibly repulsive... blaming it on unfair media coverage and sexism???? Aren't you guys the ones who essentially tried to capitalize on that fact that she would be the first woman president? That people should vote for her BECAUSE she is a woman?

How can people like this live with themselves...

The Left laughed and ridiculed Trump (and the other Republicans) for over a year, and "fly over" country got fed up with it. Most of all they were tired of the GOP establishment acting like spineless douchebags who failed to keep their campaign promises. I have to give Obama some credit for that; he tried to keep his promises, as misguided and stupid as they were.
 
So as an alternative you took your car in to the guy who's repaired no cars and has a well publicized history of scamming his customers. Good job.

As opposed to you, who took your car into someone in the business of fixing cars, but never has; but has talked about fixing cars for 30 years.
 
So as an alternative you took your car in to the guy who's repaired no cars and has a well publicized history of scamming his customers. Good job.

:roll: They got the service they asked for. The whole issue was about him using the word University when the state didn't approve of it.
 
As opposed to you, who took your car into someone in the business of fixing cars, but never has; but has talked about fixing cars for 30 years.

If you're claiming that Clinton has no experience then you're announcing yourself as unserious debater not worth addressing.
 
Yup, and they didn't learn a damn thing from that humiliating loss.

That's the scary part. The goofy ****ers still think they just didn't get their point across.
 
If you're claiming that Clinton has no experience then you're announcing yourself as unserious debater not worth addressing.

No, she has experience, she's just never done anything.
 
The Left laughed and ridiculed Trump (and the other Republicans) for over a year, and "fly over" country got fed up with it. Most of all they were tired of the GOP establishment acting like spineless douchebags who failed to keep their campaign promises. I have to give Obama some credit for that; he tried to keep his promises, as misguided and stupid as they were.

Yeah, and who's laughing, now?
 
:roll: They got the service they asked for. The whole issue was about him using the word University when the state didn't approve of it.

No, the issue was him scamming the customers out of nearly a quarter billion dollars.
 
No, the issue was him scamming the customers out of nearly a quarter billion dollars.

Nope, the whole stupid affair was over the state not authorizing the use of the word university.
 
No, she has experience, she's just never done anything.

All you're announcing is

a)You know nothing of her record outside of the scandals you learned about on Breitbart, and
b)You're an unserious debater not worthy of participating on a debate forum
 
If you're claiming that Clinton has no experience then you're announcing yourself as unserious debater not worth addressing.

I'm sorry; I didn't get your answer here:

So you vote for whoever is the most experienced and qualified candidate?
Yes, that is what a responsible voter does, especially when the more qualified and experienced candidate is also the more ethical candidate. Normal people expect to pay a price for bringing their car in to the mechanic who has zero experience and a history of scamming his customers, yet people's critical thinking skills go out the door when it comes to politics, a phenomenon I still have yet to understand.
If that were the case, McCain was without question the clear choice over Obama, hands-down, no argument. Not even the same sport, let alone the same league.

I trust, then, that your vote went to McCain?

You voted for McCain in 2008, yes? You must have, right? Can you enlighten?
 
Nope, the whole stupid affair was over the state not authorizing the use of the word university.

That's literally the least interesting part of it. You know that, which is why you're focusing on it.

Trump conned at least 6000 people (the number of people represented in the class action lawsuit) to the tune of $35,000 each for a total of 210 million dollars for his Trump University scam. He sold the university on the premise that they would learn his real estate secrets from his personally hand-picked instructors. He had no relationship with the instructors and the customers lost tens of thousands of dollars each for nothing. In fact, even when they did receive real information, they could expect to learn to commit illegal behavior. However, Trump University wasn't finished with them quite yet. There is the 98% approval rating Trump famously touted. What he did not elaborate on was that the customers were made to write non-anonymous reviews before they were allowed to received their worthless degrees (T.U. was not an accredited university) or receive extra help from instructors, which is basically the equivalent of being told at a restaurant that you won't receive your car keys back from the valet until you write a Yelp review while the manager is watching you write it. Only, the latter is nowhere near as bad, because if you did decide to write a terrible Yelp reviewer after the fact at least you'd have your car back. If the students announced after the fact that the University was a scam then they'd be broadcasting that the fake degree they just paid $35,000 for was worthless.

And now he's our President.
 
So as an alternative you took your car in to the guy who's repaired no cars and has a well publicized history of scamming his customers. Good job.

Meh, his reputation is more like an Amazon review....95% of people get good service than there are those 5% with horror stories.
 
First of all, she has forty years of experience. Dismissing that makes you an unserious debater. Second, Trump lies 70% of the time. Thirdly, any malfeasance you accuse her of is equaled or surpassed by Trump. Fourthly, she didn't scam thousands of people out of nearly a quarter billion dollars. Fifthly, she hasn't bragged about committing sexual assault or been accused by multiple victims of sexual assault. Sixthly, racism is not her platform.

You basically took your car in to the mechanic who has zero experience and a long history of scamming his customers, and you shrugged and said, "Well, sure, he butchered my car and charged me thousands of dollars for it, but at least I didn't let the guy with decades of car repair experience work on it."

Well done.

You can cry experience all you want. The problem here is Obama and liberal policies and that Hillary was going to carry Obama's torch for another 4 years. Liberal policies have been repudiated, here are some facts in support. Obama fist lost the House then the Senate and now the presidency. The GOP now controls all three branches of government that Obama lost with is liberal policies. There are 31 republican governors’ vs 18 democrat governors. The GOP now controls 68 out of 98 partisan state legislative chambers the highest number in the history of the party. This is a total repudiation of liberal policies in US History. So keep supporting the likes of experienced liberals and sit outside the stadium.
 
Meh, his reputation is more like an Amazon review....95% of people get good service than there are those 5% with horror stories.

So basically, you had a bad experience with an Amazon retailer who had great reviews, so you resolved after that to only purchase items from retailers with zero stars.

I can't see how that can go wrong.
 
If you call people rotten names in a political campaign, they generally don't vote for you. Stunning revelation, I know. It's also stunning that these Clinton aides are so ****ing stupid that they can't figure this out.

a family I know well-all four kids went to Ivy league schools-were big Hillary supporters, and their youngest son was a higher up in the Hillary Jihad for Ohio, this boy and his wife apparently spent the entire night of the election (at least after the writing was on the wall) cursing the American public with all sorts of foul names combined with uncontrolled bouts of crying. From what I saw, it was the trustafarians and mercedes Marxists who were the most condescending and arrogant towards anyone who was going to voted for Trump.
 
All you're announcing is

a)You know nothing of her record outside of the scandals you learned about on Breitbart, and
b)You're an unserious debater not worthy of participating on a debate forum

I don't read Breitbart, and you're just purely partisan if you still believe in Hillary Clinton. It's the kind of foolishness that lost you the election. She's a nothing; she got there by her name and a massively biased MSM effort. She should be in jail and forgotten. You should have stuck with Sanders who is at least honest.
 
Back
Top Bottom