• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Clinton Campaign Will Participate in Stein’s State Recounts

ocean515 said:
There is a difference between "the system is rigged" and "the votes were hacked", or whatever they are clutching at with this recount.

As proven without a doubt, the system was most certainly rigged. The emails, and Hillary's MSM partners proved that.

The recount? Fine, go for it.
Click to expand...

erm. Hacking would be rigging the system. MSM liking one person more than another isn't rigging a system.
 
countryboy said:
I see. Soooo, further damaging your brand, "brings a ray of sunshine" into your life. Hmmmm, interesting. Keep up the good work.
Click to expand...

Watching you guys lose your goddamn minds over nothing is absolutely entertaining. If the roles were reversed I would view it as a minor irritant but I would know that, ultimately, Clinton was getting sworn in come January 20th regardless. Conservatives have spent so much time accusing the Left of carrying out wide-sweeping voting fraud efforts that I guess you just came to accept that the Right was just as capable of it. As they say, thieves have the best locks on their doors.
 
Roadvirus said:
I wonder how many boxes of "uncounted ballots", all marked in favor of Hillary, will mysteriously turn up.
Click to expand...

Yep. I've been saying this since election night when Hillary refused to give a concession speech.
 
Deuce said:
erm. Hacking would be rigging the system. MSM liking one person more than another isn't rigging a system.
Click to expand...

No, I'd argue the massive effort to lie, and distort the news against one candidate , while showing favor towards the candidate they are shilling for, is most certainly rigging the system.
 
Hillary Clinton's lawyers are arriving and they've brought all the tools they'll need to ensure the integrity of the Wisconsin recount.

ballot_boxes.jpg
 
Perhaps they should do an audit of all the voters. Every single one. Anyone found to have voted twice...jail time. Anyone found to have voted for their dead parents...jail time. Anyone voting illegally...jail time.

Lets push all the buttons
 
Cardinal said:
Watching you guys lose your goddamn minds over nothing is absolutely entertaining. If the roles were reversed I would view it as a minor irritant but I would know that, ultimately, Clinton was getting sworn in come January 20th regardless. Conservatives have spent so much time accusing the Left of carrying out wide-sweeping voting fraud efforts that I guess you just came to accept that the Right was just as capable of it. As they say, thieves have the best locks on their doors.
Click to expand...

Losing our minds? Wishful thinking.

You want to see minds lost, wait til this idiotic effort fails. ;)
 
ocean515 said:
No, I'd argue the massive effort to lie, and distort the news against one candidate , while showing favor towards the candidate they are shilling for, is most certainly rigging the system.
Click to expand...

No, that's called freedom of expression. Showing favor isn't rigging, that's democracy in action. CNN has no obligation to give a maniac a fair shake. They're a private business, staffed by private citizens. Who the **** are you to tell them they must fit your definition of "fair?"
 
Deuce said:
No, that's called freedom of expression. Showing favor isn't rigging, that's democracy in action. CNN has no obligation to give a maniac a fair shake. They're a private business, staffed by private citizens. Who the **** are you to tell them they must fit your definition of "fair?"
Click to expand...

I agree, the election rigging that took place by Hillary's MSM partners was certainly protected by the 1st Amendment. I have no problem with that.

However, who the F are you to say I can't call them out for it? I'm a private citizen and I have rights too.

Crash and burn Deuce, you nuked yourself.
 
ocean515 said:
I agree, the election rigging that took place by Hillary's MSM partners was certainly protected by the 1st Amendment. I have no problem with that.

However, who the F are you to say I can't call them out for it? I'm a private citizen and I have rights too.

Crash and burn Deuce, you nuked yourself.
Click to expand...

I didn't say you can't call them out, I said it's not rigging the system.

What's that about burning
 
Deuce said:
I didn't say you can't call them out, I said it's not rigging the system.

What's that about burning
Click to expand...

But of course it is. I've already proved that. Just because they can do it, doesn't mean it isn't rigging the system.

In order to make sound decisions, the people depend on various sources to gain knowledge. When the bulk of those sources are corrupt, spreading lies and deceit on purpose, it's clear those sources are trying to rig the system in favor of the candidate they are shilling for. All this was proved beyond a shadow of a doubt.

The NYT editorial board even fell on their sword afterwards, promising they would work to be more honest in the future.

Cling to your threads Deuce, as I know you must, but those threads aren't attached to anything.
 
Deuce said:
Donald Trump was whining for a goddamned year and a half that the system is rigged.And you cheered it right along with him. Now y'all are gonna be mad that someone is questioning the system!?
Click to expand...

And Hillary was whining and complaining that Trump said he wouldn't accept the results of the election now y'all going to be mad that some are calling out the hilarious hypocrisy of your candidate
 
ocean515 said:
But of course it is. I've already proved that. Just because they can do it, doesn't mean it isn't rigging the system.

In order to make sound decisions, the people depend on various sources to gain knowledge. When the bulk of those sources are corrupt, spreading lies and deceit on purpose, it's clear those sources are trying to rig the system in favor of the candidate they are shilling for. All this was proved beyond a shadow of a doubt.

The NYT editorial board even fell on their sword afterwards, promising they would work to be more honest in the future.

Cling to your threads Deuce, as I know you must, but those threads aren't attached to anything.
Click to expand...

Evan Thomas, Newsweek Washington editor claimed the media was worth 5 points? That was in 2004... and this election the media was off the charts nuts with their bias.

The Corrupt Media has been well exposed during the past election season. All the claims we have been making for ages were exposed.
 
zimmer said:
Evan Thomas, Newsweek Washington editor claimed the media was worth 5 points? That was in 2004... and this election the media was off the charts nuts with their bias.

The Corrupt Media has been well exposed during the past election season. All the claims we have been making for ages were exposed.
Click to expand...

What has left me encouraged is that voters actually recognized what was going on, and voted accordingly. That gives me some hope.

The media, and the publics dependence on it, has been properly damaged for some time to come. It is critical that in a free society, the people have access to real, unbiased news.

It will be interesting to see what comes out of the ashes left from the pyre the media so deservedly staked itself to.
 
Trump better get people there and a lawyer to file suit before they try and turn this into fl2.0

This behavior is why Hillary lost.
 
zimmer said:
Isn't this rich... all the talk about Trump not accepting election results... Trump voters protesting...

ROTFLMFAO...

They really want to **** their party even worse.

You Go Girl!
Click to expand...

Actually, I am in favor of the recount. It will end up showing that Trump won those 3 states, and will put any ideas of electoral hanky panky to rest. It's part of what an open Democracy is all about.
 
ludin said:
Trump better get people there and a lawyer to file suit before they try and turn this into fl2.0

This behavior is why Hillary lost.
Click to expand...

On what basis? The recount is legal. It was filed by the approved people in the right timeframe and they paid the legal fees. Why do you have a problem with people following the law?
 
danarhea said:
Actually, I am in favor of the recount. It will end up showing that Trump won those 3 states, and will put any ideas of electoral hanky panky to rest. It's part of what an open Democracy is all about.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Otherwise Democrats will be wasting their time blaming "voting irregularities" for the next four years instead of focusing on jobs, which is why they lost in the first place.
 
Cardinal said:
On what basis? The recount is legal. It was filed by the approved people in the right timeframe and they paid the legal fees. Why do you have a problem with people following the law?
Click to expand...

He can challenge the validity of the recount in the basis that there is Zero evidence to it being hacked.
Also to ensure that there are not addition votes counted that shouldn't be.

Why do you have a problem accepting the election results and not denouncing this mockery of our election system.

Stein should have to go before a judge and present her evidence that the election was hacked due to a cyber attack on a
Machine that isn't connected to the internet.
 
danarhea said:
Actually, I am in favor of the recount. It will end up showing that Trump won those 3 states, and will put any ideas of electoral hanky panky to rest. It's part of what an open Democracy is all about.
Click to expand...

There is no reason for the recount.
This is a political stunt to try and deprive trump of the needed electoral votes.
 
ludin said:
There is no reason for the recount.
This is a political stunt to try and deprive trump of the needed electoral votes.
Click to expand...

It is completely lawful, and will end up further validating Trump's victory. Democrats won't be able to stay that Trump hacked or otherwise stole the election.
 
Cardinal said:
Agreed. Otherwise Democrats will be wasting their time blaming "voting irregularities" for the next four years instead of focusing on jobs, which is why they lost in the first place.
Click to expand...

There were no irregularities this has already been proven.
 
ludin said:
He can challenge the validity of the recount in the basis that there is Zero evidence to it being hacked.
Also to ensure that there are not addition votes counted that shouldn't be.

Why do you have a problem accepting the election results and not denouncing this mockery of our election system.

Stein should have to go before a judge and present her evidence that the election was hacked due to a cyber attack on a
Machine that isn't connected to the internet.
Click to expand...

Is there a law that says she needs evidence? Granted, I'm learning all of this as it comes out, but so far I'm seeing that she's met the three standards:

1)The person filing for the recount has to be a candidate.
2)Has to meet the deadline.
3)Has to pay the fees.
 
ludin said:
There were no irregularities this has already been proven.
Click to expand...

Oh, you know Democrats: some of them will always be whining about nonexistent irregularities. The recount will shut those people up so that we can get back to focusing on jobs like we were supposed to be doing all along.
 
danarhea said:
It is completely lawful, and will end up further validating Trump's victory. Democrats won't be able to stay that Trump hacked or otherwise stole the election.
Click to expand...

No the entire point is to delay the electoral count.
If they are not done with recounts by dec13th then the state risks not having their electoral votes counted.

There is zero evidence of any wrong doing or hacking certified by the election officials.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom