• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

House asks court to pause Obamacare lawsuit

Once again, your argument was no plans. There clearly are some. You were wrong. Get past that.

When their loyal foot soldiers don't even know what "the plan" is, no I don't think they have a plan. Just hand-waving, as always.
 
I figured you understood my point that was not the entirety of the solutions, but then you don't read provided links, do you?

Jesus ****ing christ, can you be bothered to read your own links?


From your source: " Some health policy analysts say it looks a bit like Obamacare light."

Duhh. It's a set of symbolic tweaks to Obamacare.


The title says "its costs are unclear," lol...

Note also: "The new plan does not include any price tags but rather resurfaces ideas that have long been discussed in Republican policy circles."

Note also that it's a REPEAT of the above plan.


This is yet another REPEAT of the plan discussed in the first and second articles.


HSAs are a way for the wealthy to save money. Tax deductions most help those who have the most income.

Oh, and this is a FOURTH MENTION of the EXACT SAME "House Republican" plan. ****ing ****, dude.

You are CHOOSING to be uninformed. Try harder before you spout a talking point.

So ****ing ironic. Too bad republicans are more interested in partisanship than properly governing Americans.
 
Jesus ****ing christ, can you be bothered to read your own links?



From your source: " Some health policy analysts say it looks a bit like Obamacare light."

Duhh. It's a set of symbolic tweaks to Obamacare.



The title says "its costs are unclear," lol...

Note also: "The new plan does not include any price tags but rather resurfaces ideas that have long been discussed in Republican policy circles."

Note also that it's a REPEAT of the above plan.



This is yet another REPEAT of the plan discussed in the first and second articles.



HSAs are a way for the wealthy to save money. Tax deductions most help those who have the most income.

Oh, and this is a FOURTH MENTION of the EXACT SAME "House Republican" plan. ****ing ****, dude.



So ****ing ironic. Too bad republicans are more interested in partisanship than properly governing Americans.

Its so funny, you guys go from they have no plan to whining about the plans. You want training wheels for the goalposts?
 
When their loyal foot soldiers don't even know what "the plan" is, no I don't think they have a plan. Just hand-waving, as always.

Of course you don't, it fits your narrative. We're done.
 
Its so funny, you guys go from they have no plan to whining about the plans. You want training wheels for the goalposts?

Where did i say they have no plans? Here is what i remember-

Republicans only plans to replace Obamacare are Obamacare with largely superficial changes like a different name. Obamacare was based on republican plans. It employs the market to solve the problem.

The only serious plans that i have heard of are extremely similar to Obamacare. There is only one additional aspect of value i've heard of: price transparency. If republicans have any other secret plans, i am not aware of them. Blaming the media is pathetic- the media would be happy to report on alternatives.
 
Where did i say they have no plans? Here is what i remember-

Superficial, right, got it and Im supposed to depend on your analysis? I would much rather small steps were taken to dismantle the current system and find what works and what doesn't than the gigantic cluster**** we have now.
 
Superficial, right, got it and Im supposed to depend on your analysis? I would much rather small steps were taken to dismantle the current system and find what works and what doesn't than the gigantic cluster**** we have now.

It was an even more gigantic cluster**** before Obamacare. That's the truth that you seem to find too inconvenient to acknowledge.
 
Back
Top Bottom