- Joined
- Jul 2, 2014
- Messages
- 7,437
- Reaction score
- 1,950
- Location
- Confirmation Bias Land
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
I await your evidence.
Not until you answer the question.
I await your evidence.
Not until you answer the question.
Not until you answer the question.
I'm gonna take that as a "no", you don't have any evidence to support your contention that hate and fear drove US foreign policy with regard to containment. If you had any, you'd have offered it before now. Our foreign policy is dictated by preferred outcomes. One starts with the most desirable outcome, and then describes the circumstances required that would lead to such an outcome. It's intended to be an exhaustive process, and high powered emotions don't enter into it.
And that's exactly the problem that you and Jack have: you're both thoroughly convinced that US foreign policy always works as it should. You assume perfection where it can't possibly exist.
And that's exactly the problem that you and Jack have: you're both thoroughly convinced that US foreign policy always works as it should. You assume perfection where it can't possibly exist.
I still await your evidence.:waiting:
And I still await a responsive reply to my question.
You made the claim. You must support it before anything else happens. #677 repeated for your convenience.
Then we're at an impasse because I won't engage with a poster who won't support his claim. This is not an interview where you ask and I answer. The first word in the name of this site is "Debate." You advanced a claim; support it or withdraw.
You know what happens next. I'm waiting, too.
Fine by me. I'm not the one with an unsupported claim hanging out there.
I demonstrated more than once how the claim is self-evident. If a logical construct of the support is something you're afraid to explore, that's not my concern.
Sorry, but you have provided nothing to support your claim.