• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Despite Trump's Claims, Evidence From FBI's Clinton Foundation Probe 'Not Impressive'

Re: Despite Trump's Claims, Evidence From FBI's Clinton Foundation Probe 'Not Impress

I watch you republobots keep talking about mountains of damaging evidence... but then never back it up. Kind of like your post here. All accusations, no proof. That is crying wolf.

And you all tend to take it even another step further by fabricating conspiracy theories as reasons to why she isn't in jail for these mountains of corruption you guys have no evidence for.
I am not sure there is any real evidence, yet, in this Carlos Danger stuff against Hillary, but there is no question that Huma is in serious jeopardy if there are any classified emails or State Department material on that computer.
 
Re: Despite Trump's Claims, Evidence From FBI's Clinton Foundation Probe 'Not Impress

I am not sure there is any real evidence, yet, in this Carlos Danger stuff against Hillary, but there is no question that Huma is in serious jeopardy if there are any classified emails or State Department material on that computer.

Huma may be.
 
Re: Despite Trump's Claims, Evidence From FBI's Clinton Foundation Probe 'Not Impress

I watch you republobots keep talking about mountains of damaging evidence... but then never back it up. Kind of like your post here. All accusations, no proof. That is crying wolf.

And you Hillary supporters keep pretending that Comey's July 5th statement exonerated Hillary. Back it up ?

https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system

M'kay, there's Comey remarks....



And there's Trey Gowdy grilling Comey.

So, we know Hillary lied about why she created a Server ( for the convience of using one device ), we know she lied about sending and recieving classified material , we know she lied about turning over all work related Emails to the State department and to the Congressional oversite commitee , we know her aides destroyed electonic devices that were under Congressional subpoena and we know work related emails were deleted.

Comey's rationale for not recomending charges was the lack of intent, right ? So she violated the law

Comey also said in similar circumstance anyone else could and would be held accountable for doing the same thing
Again, none of that fits the " cry wolf " idiom you people keep using, or your claims that this is some kind of partisan driven witch hunt ?

A witch hunt denotes persecution. So when Democrat Presidential candidates are held to the same judicial standards as the rest of us, its because they're being persecuted ?
 
Re: Despite Trump's Claims, Evidence From FBI's Clinton Foundation Probe 'Not Impress

Huma may be.

If this were just about Huma ( Lol....it isn't ) dont you think we would have heard something by now?

Obama's DOJ who's apparently working in close concert with the FBI to diseminate ( to mitigate the damage ) all these Emails would get that info out ASAP, before this does anymore damage to her canddiacy.

Every Democrat politician Hillary shill would have come out immediately and let us all know these Emails have nothing to do with Hillary.

One things certain, Hillary knows exactly whats in those Emails. All she had to do was ask Huma after Comey made his anouncment Friday.

Had Huma told her there's nothing to worry about thn thats all we would be hearing.
 
Re: Despite Trump's Claims, Evidence From FBI's Clinton Foundation Probe 'Not Impress

And you Hillary supporters keep pretending that Comey's July 5th statement exonerated Hillary. Back it up ?

https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system

M'kay, there's Comey remarks....



And there's Trey Gowdy grilling Comey.

So, we know Hillary lied about why she created a Server ( for the convience of using one device ), we know she lied about sending and recieving classified material , we know she lied about turning over all work related Emails to the State department and to the Congressional oversite commitee , we know her aides destroyed electonic devices that were under Congressional subpoena and we know work related emails were deleted.

Comey's rationale for not recomending charges was the lack of intent, right ? So she violated the law

Comey also said in similar circumstance anyone else could and would be held accountable for doing the same thing
Again, none of that fits the " cry wolf " idiom you people keep using, or your claims that this is some kind of partisan driven witch hunt ?

A witch hunt denotes persecution. So when Democrat Presidential candidates are held to the same judicial standards as the rest of us, its because they're being persecuted ?


Has Hillary beem indicted or has she been arrested? No? Then what you have is conspiracy theories. That is all.
 
Re: Despite Trump's Claims, Evidence From FBI's Clinton Foundation Probe 'Not Impress

If this were just about Huma ( Lol....it isn't ) dont you think we would have heard something by now?

Obama's DOJ who's apparently working in close concert with the FBI to diseminate ( to mitigate the damage ) all these Emails would get that info out ASAP, before this does anymore damage to her canddiacy.

Every Democrat politician Hillary shill would have come out immediately and let us all know these Emails have nothing to do with Hillary.

One things certain, Hillary knows exactly whats in those Emails. All she had to do was ask Huma after Comey made his anouncment Friday.

Had Huma told her there's nothing to worry about thn thats all we would be hearing.

I particularly like how you lead with questions almost every single time. As if your wide-open speculation is all the proof you need.
 
Re: Despite Trump's Claims, Evidence From FBI's Clinton Foundation Probe 'Not Impress

I particularly like how you lead with questions almost every single time. As if your wide-open speculation is all the proof you need.

Thats how people learn, they ask questions and I'm a inquisitive guy, so sue me.
And sure its speculation but Hillary and her campaign sure are easy to read.

It doesn't help that she thought and continues to think the average American is as dumb as a bag of hammers. " For the convience of using one device "

Seriously ? You know who came up with that lie ? The SAME guy that thought came up with the " spontaneous protest " narrative

The fact that anything that she or her campaign says is game as far as speculation is concerned is on her and any criticism amd or distrust is absolutley warranted.
 
Re: Despite Trump's Claims, Evidence From FBI's Clinton Foundation Probe 'Not Impress

Thats how people learn, they ask questions and I'm a inquisitive guy, so sue me.
And sure its speculation but Hillary and her campaign sure are easy to read.

It doesn't help that she thought and continues to think the average American is as dumb as a bag of hammers. " For the convience of using one device "

Seriously ? You know who came up with that lie ? The SAME guy that thought came up with the " spontaneous protest " narrative

The fact that anything that she or her campaign says is game as far as speculation is concerned is on her and any criticism amd or distrust is absolutley warranted.

Your questions are rhetorical. They aren't for learning. They are for putting forth a narrative based on no evidence. And because it's in question form rather than being an honest statement, it gives you wiggle room to weasel out of it.
 
Re: Despite Trump's Claims, Evidence From FBI's Clinton Foundation Probe 'Not Impress

Has Hillary beem indicted or has she been arrested? No? Then what you have is conspiracy theories. That is all.

No, she wasn't indicted. Remember Comey took it upon himself to make the call not to recomend a indictment.

Why do you think there's such a **** storm surrounding Hillary right now ?
 
Re: Despite Trump's Claims, Evidence From FBI's Clinton Foundation Probe 'Not Impress

8 U.S. Code § 2071 States That A Violator Of This StatuteShall Forfeit His Office And Be Disqualified From Holding Any Office Under The United States.”“Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.”

Anybody here want to claim Hillary and minions didn't violate this statute? At the same time I do not believe that just because it says "Shall Forfeit His Office" means that She does not come under the same rule.

Trump is right, she has absolutely no right ad should not be allowed to run for president.
 
Re: Despite Trump's Claims, Evidence From FBI's Clinton Foundation Probe 'Not Impress

I think everyone is right about the amount of wrong going on

Hillary, if she wins, is going to be mired in controversy for years. What she did was definitely a bad idea, absolutely an attempt to avoid FOIA requests, and potentially illegal.

Comey shouldn't have sent the letter. He should not be making public announcements about reopening investigations 8 days before an election. If it ends up he doesn't find anything new, he absolutely swayed an election HEAVILY for no reason. He was protected from any insinuation of partisanship by the policies he decided to ignore.

Trump should stop destroying faith in our public institutions.
 
Re: Despite Trump's Claims, Evidence From FBI's Clinton Foundation Probe 'Not Impress

Despite Trump's Claims, Evidence From FBI's Clinton Foundation Probe 'Not Impressive,' Sources Say - ABC News







Yet again, a witch hunt investigation against HRC turns up nothing damning. Rinse, lather, repeat. And yet again, Fox "News" gets it wrong.

But this won't stop Trump and his base from letting the facts get in their way.

Hold the phone... first, the quote "not impressive" is based on a February presentation, not on current evidence. Second, after reading the story, it appears that the ABC source is speculating on what they believe is currently going on and the evidence they have today.

The Fox News source had a lot of details and made very specific claims, while the words of the ABC story's source seem a bit ambiguous.

.
 
Re: Despite Trump's Claims, Evidence From FBI's Clinton Foundation Probe 'Not Impress

I don't find the objections expressed in the OP very impressive. The Clintons have a long track record of lying and skirting the law. If you have any evidence they've changed their stripes since Hillary lied to Congress and the American people some months ago, now would be a good time to present it.
 
Re: Despite Trump's Claims, Evidence From FBI's Clinton Foundation Probe 'Not Impress

I don't find the objections expressed in the OP very impressive. The Clintons have a long track record of lying and skirting the law. If you have any evidence they've changed their stripes since Hillary lied to Congress and the American people some months ago, now would be a good time to present it.

Oh forcryingoutloud ... evidence? You want evidence? Alicia Machado! What more do you want? I've had it with all you reich-wing Hillary haters.
 
Re: Despite Trump's Claims, Evidence From FBI's Clinton Foundation Probe 'Not Impress

No, she wasn't indicted. Remember Comey took it upon himself to make the call not to recomend a indictment.

Why do you think there's such a **** storm surrounding Hillary right now ?

Because it's election time and you guys can't run on policy so you need to stir up a **** storm of distraction. That's why.

If you think I'm wrong then please oh PLEASE start making threads again help push the national discussion towards building a stupid wall and how he's so smart and knows lots of words and stuff and throwing muslims and mexicans out of the country. They realized that was a losing campaign strategy so faking up conspiracy theories was their next best option.
 
Re: Despite Trump's Claims, Evidence From FBI's Clinton Foundation Probe 'Not Impress

Because it's election time and you guys can't run on policy so you need to stir up a **** storm of distraction. That's why.

If you think I'm wrong then please oh PLEASE start making threads again help push the national discussion towards building a stupid wall and how he's so smart and knows lots of words and stuff and throwing muslims and mexicans out of the country. They realized that was a losing campaign strategy so faking up conspiracy theories was their next best option.

First, this......
Emails related to Hillary's State Dept tenure found on Abedins Computer....
FBI finds emails related to Hillary Clinton's State Department tenure - CBS News

Next, what " policy " has Clinton run on ? Attacking Trump and his supporters isn't a exactly policy discussion.

Next, she and the DNC and whoever thought it was a good idea to run someone with as much baggage as Hillary Clinton caused this distraction.

Im sure they thought she it could all be contained and managed, or explained away as part of some vast conspiracy......Ooops

As it turns out Americans dont have much sympathy for power hungry elitist who think they're above the law and apparently neither do the rank and file at the FBI.

She brought all of this on herself and all of the whining and kvetching from the Left isn't going to change that
 
Re: Despite Trump's Claims, Evidence From FBI's Clinton Foundation Probe 'Not Impress

First, this......
Emails related to Hillary's State Dept tenure found on Abedins Computer....
FBI finds emails related to Hillary Clinton's State Department tenure - CBS News

Next, what " policy " has Clinton run on ? Attacking Trump and his supporters isn't a exactly policy discussion.

Next, she and the DNC and whoever thought it was a good idea to run someone with as much baggage as Hillary Clinton caused this distraction.

Im sure they thought she it could all be contained and managed, or explained away as part of some vast conspiracy......Ooops

As it turns out Americans dont have much sympathy for power hungry elitist who think they're above the law and apparently neither do the rank and file at the FBI.

She brought all of this on herself and all of the whining and kvetching from the Left isn't going to change that

Neither can run on policy because BOTH are too busy criticizing the other. Hence why BOTH have such high unfavorable ratings.
 
Re: Despite Trump's Claims, Evidence From FBI's Clinton Foundation Probe 'Not Impress

First, this......
Emails related to Hillary's State Dept tenure found on Abedins Computer....
FBI finds emails related to Hillary Clinton's State Department tenure - CBS News

Next, what " policy " has Clinton run on ? Attacking Trump and his supporters isn't a exactly policy discussion.

Next, she and the DNC and whoever thought it was a good idea to run someone with as much baggage as Hillary Clinton caused this distraction.

Im sure they thought she it could all be contained and managed, or explained away as part of some vast conspiracy......Ooops

As it turns out Americans dont have much sympathy for power hungry elitist who think they're above the law and apparently neither do the rank and file at the FBI.

She brought all of this on herself and all of the whining and kvetching from the Left isn't going to change that

Yeah... she brought on all of trump and his minions' false accusations, conspiracy theories and unfounded innuendo. It's all her fault her detractors are unhinged to the point they live on fabrications of their hate. :lol:
 
Re: Despite Trump's Claims, Evidence From FBI's Clinton Foundation Probe 'Not Impress

Yeah... she brought on all of trump and his minions' false accusations, conspiracy theories and unfounded innuendo. It's all her fault her detractors are unhinged to the point they live on fabrications of their hate. :lol:

The FBI isn't concerned with " Conspiracy theories " and partisan accusations.
 
Re: Despite Trump's Claims, Evidence From FBI's Clinton Foundation Probe 'Not Impress

Neither can run on policy because BOTH are too busy criticizing the other. Hence why BOTH have such high unfavorable ratings.

Thats not true. Hillary could simply take the high rad and ignore Trumps rhetoric. The voters would reward her for it.

So, what policies would Clinton run on if she wasn't focused on attacking Trump ?

Because Ive read through her " Public " policy initiatives and if she goes that route we're screwed.
 
Re: Despite Trump's Claims, Evidence From FBI's Clinton Foundation Probe 'Not Impress

I guess when it all comes down to it, we'll see how the Trump Campaign's first, final, and only campaign argument... "But... E-mails!"... works next Tuesday, especially when balanced against a star's right to "grab 'em by the *****!".
 
Re: Despite Trump's Claims, Evidence From FBI's Clinton Foundation Probe 'Not Impress

Yet again, a witch hunt investigation against HRC turns up nothing damning. Rinse, lather, repeat. And yet again, Fox "News" gets it wrong.

But this won't stop Trump and his base from letting the facts get in their way.

Obama's Justice Department was a joke under Eric Holder, and it's become a bigger joke under Lynch. I mean, what kind of Attorney General has an impromptu, secret rendezvous at the behest of the spouse of an individual under investigation by her department on a private plane at an airport in Phoenix? Then, within days, the FBI director, who was himself a seasoned federal prosecutor, announces that Hillary didn't break the law and will not be prosecuted even though none of the statutes in question require that intent be demonstrated?

In the current case, Robert Capers, the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, seems to have undermined the FBI at every turn. Calling your superiors in Washington to complain about investigators who "won't let it go" doesn't inspire confidence in the Justice Department, especially when your predecessor and current boss was appointed to her position by Bill Clinton. That's a bad thing for a political appointee to do. I mean, how can you have a proper "witch hunt" if you don't even provide the authority to issue a subpoena or interview third parties?

What these Democratic political hacks are doing is undermining the public's confidence in government in general and the Justice Department in particular, and they'll have no one to blame but themselves as this blows up in their faces. Instead of having the sense to give the FBI access to proper investigative tools, which should have been routine, and present the outcome of the agency's investigation to a federal grand jury, what Obama's department has done is to ensure that Hillary, if elected, will enter office under a huge cloud. It will dog her for years. It might even help generate what a week ago was unthinkable by a lot of Democrats: a Trump victory. Obama must be at least a bit worried, because until recently he was largely a no show for Hillary, but lately has been seen out and about beating the bushes on her behalf. In any case, I hope this feckless "leader" is sweating bullets upon his realization that his legacy is poised to head straight to the toilet.
 
Back
Top Bottom