• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Clinton Ally Aided Campaign of FBI Official’s Wife

This topic is about nepotism and similar... so yes it is also about Trump.

No, it is not. But, by all means, continue to assassinate your credibility by further revealing yourself to be an irrelevant partisan that ignores the topic if it threatens to insult your cognitive dissonance and reveal to yourself that you are not being honest with yourself when you stipulate your opposition to Hillary Clinton and American militarism.
 
Of course I do.. to bail out rich silverspoon pricks like Trump

Actually, it's to encourage entrepreneurs to invest without fear of ending up in jail, or on the streets.

The flip side of this are the rich silver spoon government bureaucrats like Hillary, who enrich themselves and put taxpayers money as risk.

When the effort fails, they just walk away unscathed and go on the hunt for other opportunities to exploit the system and line their pockets, while taxpayers are left holding the bag.
 
Have I? You show me a person who has survived 4+ bankruptcies and still supposedly has millions?

I know of quite a few who've taken multiple bankruptcies, and if you bother to look, you can see them for yourself. As people here are fond of saying, Google is your friend. Understand, that Trump's bankruptcies are not personal bankruptcies. They are failures of business ventures.
 
LOL Trump did not create anything. He got it handed to him by HIS FATHER! In fact a blind monkey throwing randomly at stock listings would have had a bigger return on investment than Trump.

If one's objective is to solely make money, that's true. If an individual is intent on creating something more than just personal wealth, one could follow Trump's path. There are significant risks in pursuing a path like Trump's. Bankruptcy of certain ventures is one of them.
 
You said the tax payer bailed him out. That's wrong, and not how bankruptcy works here in the US. So no, based on your own posts, you do not.

So you are saying that the state, aka the tax payer did not suffer a loss during his many bankruptcies... are you really that naive?
 
LOL 5+ bankruptcies that cost the taxpayer billions.. yea sure he and his kids did not cost the public a dime.. not to mention the sweetheart subsidies his businesses got from government.

Regardless you cant claim nepotism is bad for one candidate and not for the other.. that is utter hypocrisy.

Uh how did it cost taxpayers Billions. you are assuming that all wealth belongs to the government and if someone doesn't pay taxes because of a loss they suffered that is taking money the government owned all along.

speaking of nepotism-where are all the Lefties who were wetting their pants over Bush II but seem all too happy to have a third term for Bill Clinton?
 
Back
Top Bottom