• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Donald Trump: 'I will totally accept' election results 'if I win'

The election hasn't happened. You have no evidence of any kind of rigging.

Rigging will often occur prior. You can find evidence prior. We have evidence from Wikileaks of cheating taking place prior to the debate between sanders and Clinton.. of cheating taking place prior to the votes in the democrat primary... etc.
 
Rigging will often occur prior. You can find evidence prior. We have evidence from Wikileaks of cheating taking place prior to the debate between sanders and Clinton.. of cheating taking place prior to the votes in the democrat primary... etc.

The WikiLeaks emails don't show any rigging. No votes have been cast yet. And Donald Trump wasn't in the Democratic primary so he has no reason to discuss it. If Bernie Sanders wants to make an issue out of it, let him.

If Trump loses, as he probably will and good riddance, it's because he's a piece of garbage that decent people can't stomach.
 
You should have actually read what you found. Bush v Gore was cited as one of several reasons for paranoia on the left (against Hillary, btw), not as an analogous case. Enjoy your meal.

[h=2]7. Salon’s Farhad Manjoo[/h]“Was the New Hampshire vote stolen?” Manjoo asked of the 2008 New Hampshire primary Clinton unexpectedly won.
In recent years several factors — 1) crazily hackable voting machines, 2) generally heightened partisanship, 3) very close races, and 4) a real, honest-to-goodness purloined race (see Bush v. Gore) — have raised the paranoid in all of us. Wondering if any election outcome is honest has become a standard post-election emotion; not wondering, now that’s just crazy.
Manjoo concluded his piece by saying that even if we fixed our voting machines, it still wouldn’t make elections fair.

You were caught red handed, over the same lies, twice.

It is obvious to any objective reader.
 
The WikiLeaks emails don't show any rigging. No votes have been cast yet. And Donald Trump wasn't in the Democratic primary so he has no reason to discuss it. If Bernie Sanders wants to make an issue out of it, let him.

If Trump loses, as he probably will and good riddance, it's because he's a piece of garbage that decent people can't stomach.

The fact is, there can be evidence of rigging before an event occurs. I was using the wikileaks as an example of rigging an election before votes were cast. I used the black sox scandal (sinceyou tried to use baseball) as an example of rigging a game before it was played. It is why your argument that rigging can't occur prior to an election is absolute garbage and ridiculous.
 
Feel free to be more careful with your own statements and arguments so that you do not so blatantly contradict yourself in the future.

Again, no. You have had this wrong from the start. Arm waving and name calling don't substitute for sound argumentation.
 
Again, no. You have had this wrong from the start. Arm waving and name calling don't substitute for sound argumentation.

#204 and #209 conclusively displays your unwillingness to demonstrate so much as a modicum of honesty.
 
Had the link used Gore to make the case you would have a point. It didn't and you don't.

More deflection that serves as further evidence that you refuse to acknowledge the failure of your own claim.
 
Back
Top Bottom