• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ted Cruz calls for Criminal Probe lnto ‘Voter Fraud ’ Visits to White House

truthatallcost

truthatallcost

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 1, 2014
Messages
26,719
Reaction score
6,278
Location
California
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Sen. Ted Cruz called for a “serious criminal investigation” into multiple visits to the White House by Democratic consultant Robert Creamer after undercover videos showed he was involved in hiring protesters to disrupt Donald Trump events.

Mr. Cruz’s comment came after the Daily Caller reported that White that Mr. Creamer has paid 342 visits to the White House, including 47 with Mr. Obama, since 2009.
Mr. Creamer, the husband of Rep. Jan Schakowsky, Illinois Democrat, was sentenced to five months in prison after pleading guilty to tax and banking violations in 2005.
Click to expand...

I agree with Cruz, there needs to be an investigation into why a convicted criminal, who admitted to voter fraud, has visited Barack Obama 342 times at the White House.

Thoughts?
Comments?
Ted Cruz calls for criminal probe into visits by 'voter fraud operative' to Obama White House - Washington Times
 
A political side show that is doubtful to result in an investigation and even more doubtful to result in charges against someone.
 
truthatallcost said:
Not with pals like Hillary, amirite?
Click to expand...

More or less. The issue is Republicans have spent millions trying to investigate everything Hillary, and an occasional dig on Obama too. We do not have much result from it all.

In fact, we have learned far more from WikiLeaks and "Hackers" and "Russians" than we have from all the **** Republicans have been up to... for years.
 
OrphanSlug said:
A political side show that is doubtful to result in an investigation and even more doubtful to result in charges against someone.
Click to expand...

Are you saying that we shouldn't call out corruption in politics because corrupt politicians won't do anything? I note a distinct absence in an assertion by you that what the DNC official admitted to on camera didn't actually happen.
 
OrphanSlug said:
More or less. The issue is Republicans have spent millions trying to investigate everything Hillary, and an occasional dig on Obama too. We do not have much result from it all.

In fact, we have learned far more from WikiLeaks and "Hackers" and "Russians" than we have from all the **** Republicans have been up to... for years.
Click to expand...

Mrs. Clinton has clearly been investigated, but no money was spent on these investigations. These are government employees performing their jobs and collecting their regular salaries.
 
OrphanSlug said:
More or less. The issue is Republicans have spent millions trying to investigate everything Hillary, and an occasional dig on Obama too. We do not have much result from it all.

In fact, we have learned far more from WikiLeaks and "Hackers" and "Russians" than we have from all the **** Republicans have been up to... for years.
Click to expand...

I see, so we should just ignore all of the apparent democrat shenanigans, and give up. Never mind that this person is on tape admitting to voter fraud, and has visited the White House 342 times. Got it.

Good grief, how ridiculous can you get?
 
jmotivator said:
Are you saying that we shouldn't call out corruption in politics because corrupt politicians won't do anything? I note a distinct absence in an assertion by you that what the DNC official admitted to on camera didn't actually happen.
Click to expand...

Yes, that is exactly what Orphan Slug is saying. Pretty ****ing pathetic.
 
AliHajiSheik said:
Mrs. Clinton has clearly been investigated, but no money was spent on these investigations. These are government employees performing their jobs and collecting their regular salaries.
Click to expand...

Money HAS been spent on these investigations because those government employees could have been performing other duties. Your poor excuse of witch hunting is noted.
 
jmotivator said:
Are you saying that we shouldn't call out corruption in politics because corrupt politicians won't do anything? I note a distinct absence in an assertion by you that what the DNC official admitted to on camera didn't actually happen.
Click to expand...

Great bait question and comment!

What was admitted to is probably deserving of investigation, the question is what Cruz is really asking for. Suggesting by meeting with Obama that he is engaging in collusion with Mr. Creamer on voter fraud requires a bit more than a White House visitors log.

Best of luck with Republicans finding that, so it comes down to a political side show I was talking about (and probably another couple million on another "Congressional Investigation" that results in zero charges.)

So what else you got?
 
countryboy said:
I see, so we should just ignore all of the apparent democrat shenanigans, and give up. Never mind that this person is on tape admitting to voter fraud, and has visited the White House 342 times. Got it.

Good grief, how ridiculous can you get?
Click to expand...

What else you got besides a White House visitors log?
 
jmotivator said:
Are you saying that we shouldn't call out corruption in politics because corrupt politicians won't do anything? I note a distinct absence in an assertion by you that what the DNC official admitted to on camera didn't actually happen.
Click to expand...
:applaud:applaud
 
OrphanSlug said:
What else you got besides a White House visitors log?
Click to expand...

Why is this a partisan issue? Until we are all willing to fight corruption where we find it, we'll continue to get exactly what we deserve.
 
MaggieD said:
Why is this a partisan issue? Until we are all willing to fight corruption where we find it, we'll continue to get exactly what we deserve.
Click to expand...

Why is it a one way street? (That is really my ultimate issue.)
 
OrphanSlug said:
Great bait question and comment!

What was admitted to is probably deserving of investigation, the question is what Cruz is really asking for. Suggesting by meeting with Obama that he is engaging in collusion with Mr. Creamer on voter fraud requires a bit more than a White House visitors log.

Best of luck with Republicans finding that, so it comes down to a political side show I was talking about (and probably another couple million on another "Congressional Investigation" that results in zero charges.)

So what else you got?
Click to expand...

So we should ignore a person who commits voter fraud (which doesn't exist btw), and has access to the President of The United States on a daily basis. Yes, we got it. We are clear on your position. It's ****ing retarded, it's ****ing idiotic in the extreme, but, we got it.
 
countryboy said:
So we should ignore a person who commits voter fraud (which doesn't exist btw), and has access to the President of The United States on a daily basis. Yes, we got it. We are clear on your position. It's ****ing retarded, it's ****ing idiotic in the extreme, but, we got it.
Click to expand...

I am asking what else you got besides a White House visitors log to prove Obama was in on voter fraud, and I am doubtful Republicans have all that much.
 
OrphanSlug said:
What else you got besides a White House visitors log?
Click to expand...

That's why Cruz is calling for an i n v e s t i g a t i o n. You know, to like, i n v e s t i g a t e, and stuff. :roll:
 
MaggieD said:
Why is this a partisan issue? Until we are all willing to fight corruption where we find it, we'll continue to get exactly what we deserve.
Click to expand...

There has been no proof of corruption, really a visitor log is now an indictment of automatic guilt? Gimme a break. Investigate it? Sure. Make a huge deal out of it before anyone finds out any information? Nothing but partisan bull****.
 
OrphanSlug said:
I am asking what else you got besides a White House visitors log to prove Obama was in on voter fraud, and I am doubtful Republicans have all that much.
Click to expand...

Why, why are you asking that? Like I said, your utterly moronic, idiotic, retarded, stupid, blatantly partisan hackish position is noted. No need to keep repeating yourself.
 
Praxas said:
There has been no proof of corruption, really a visitor log is now an indictment of automatic guilt? Gimme a break. Investigate it? Sure. Make a huge deal out of it before anyone finds out any information? Nothing but partisan bull****.
Click to expand...

Who made a big deal about it??

Oh! Wait! That would be the media.
 
countryboy said:
That's why Cruz is calling for an i n v e s t i g a t i o n. You know, to like, i n v e s t i g a t e, and stuff. :roll:
Click to expand...

Based on what?

If guilt by association is the standard for investigation then we need investigations on a very large number of members of this present Congress 'D and 'R following their names.

My question is where is the line, or are you stuck on anything Obama/Hillary gets one standard and Republican corruption (or establishment corruption) gets a pass?

You guys have been at Hillary/Obama for years on all sorts of subjects claiming this or that, anyone of substance seriously charged? Don't you think we should have something of substance before starting another "Congressional Investigation / Hearing?" I have my doubts on a White House visitors log being the one thing that starts this, unless Cruz has something else.
 
countryboy said:
Why, why are you asking that? Like I said, your utterly moronic, idiotic, retarded, stupid, blatantly partisan hackish position is noted. No need to keep repeating yourself.
Click to expand...

Go with ad hominem all you need to, the question stands. What else you got other than association via a visitors log?
 
Praxas said:
Money HAS been spent on these investigations because those government employees could have been performing other duties. Your poor excuse of witch hunting is noted.
Click to expand...

I'm really not interested in what you noted. Opportunity cost is not an expense, ask an accountant.
 
OrphanSlug said:
Go with ad hominem all you need to, the question stands. What else you got other than association via a visitors log?
Click to expand...
If this were Paul Ryan meeting with a political operative who was caught on tape talking about vote fraud, you'd be singing a different tune.

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom