• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump on Lindsay Lohan in 2004: 'Deeply troubled' women are 'always the best in bed'

Re: Trump on Lindsay Lohan in 2004: 'Deeply troubled' women are 'always the best in b

Zyphlin said:
I'm not going to sit here and lie....

Sitting around with friends, especially back in college, I remember looking at someone like Lohan, or Amy Winehouse, or Angelina Jolie and taking part in conversations about how one or the other are crazy but you know they're probably wild in the sack.

I can remember having these types of sitting around joking testosterone fueled conversations with friends of pretty much EVERY political stripe. And I have a hard time believing most guys haven't said something similar about a woman at some point in their life. This idiotic notion or attitude that a guy has never, EVER, talked about any woman in any fashion as simply a sexual object, even for just a moment, is just utter and complete bull**** that I find utterly unbelievable.

That doesn't mean this particular comment, in this particular context (well, context of which we have little it seems), is okay or should be ignored. Doesn't mean that Donald's statements, as a whole, shouldn't be looked at to get a measure of a man. But this strange attitude and faux outrage and aghast nature of the notion that anyone would dare make such a comment because you'd NEVER EVER EVER make any kind of negative comment towards a celebrities mental issues or treating women as a sex object is just a bit ridiculous.
Click to expand...

I think people forget that there are women men look for just to have sex with and there are others they court to be their wives.

There is nothing wrong with men commenting on women or women commenting on men.
 
Re: Trump on Lindsay Lohan in 2004: 'Deeply troubled' women are 'always the best in b

Cardinal said:
It's about a higher standard person for a higher standard office. Out of a pool of roughly 125 million qualifiable citizens, people should be looking to the highest possible standard for the office of the most powerful person in the world.
Click to expand...

Was he running for President in 2004?
 
Re: Trump on Lindsay Lohan in 2004: 'Deeply troubled' women are 'always the best in b

Mason66 said:
Was he running for President in 2004?
Click to expand...

You probably think that question is relevant. It isn't.
 
Re: Trump on Lindsay Lohan in 2004: 'Deeply troubled' women are 'always the best in b

JumpinJack said:
You are troubled, like Lindsay Lohan. It is not fine for a public figure to refer to someone else's problems in the sense that that makes for great sex.
Click to expand...

This is an extremely common saying / belief. I've heard it multiple times from multiple people (public and private) over the course of multiple years. BFD.
 
Re: Trump on Lindsay Lohan in 2004: 'Deeply troubled' women are 'always the best in b

upsideguy said:
Speak for yourself, pal. I have not.
Click to expand...

You have never commented on a women's body parts or said you would like to have sex with her?

I seriously doubt that, unless...
 
Re: Trump on Lindsay Lohan in 2004: 'Deeply troubled' women are 'always the best in b

Cardinal said:
You probably think that question is relevant. It isn't.
Click to expand...

So if somebody says something like this 12 years before they run for President, they should be excluded?

Do you realize there would never be a man nor a women running for President again?
 
Re: Trump on Lindsay Lohan in 2004: 'Deeply troubled' women are 'always the best in b

Mason66 said:
So if somebody says something like this 12 years before they run for President, they should be excluded?

Do you realize there would never be a man nor a women running for President again?
Click to expand...

I'm sorry you believe these are the highest standards our nation can produce.
 
Re: Trump on Lindsay Lohan in 2004: 'Deeply troubled' women are 'always the best in b

Cardinal said:
I'm sorry you believe these are the highest standards our nation can produce.
Click to expand...

The point is that everybody says things like this in their life.

It is not an indication of any level of standard.
 
Re: Trump on Lindsay Lohan in 2004: 'Deeply troubled' women are 'always the best in b

Mason66 said:
The point is that everybody says things like this in their life.

It is not an indication of any level of standard.
Click to expand...

And everybody wakes up at 7am and drinks two cups of coffee with cream and two tablespoons of sugar. Because that's what I do.
 
Re: Trump on Lindsay Lohan in 2004: 'Deeply troubled' women are 'always the best in b

Cardinal said:
It's about a higher standard person for a higher standard office. Out of a pool of roughly 125 million qualifiable citizens, people should be looking to the highest possible standard for the office of the most powerful person in the world.
Click to expand...

But that's his appeal to them.

"He talks just like I do."

The idea that the most powerful office on earth should be held by an intelligent person with an even temperament who's above the fray and represents what's best in America is a concept that's foreign to them.

That's why his steadfast ignorance is so appealing. "I don't know stuff either and that's why I love Trump!"

Look at the response to Snopes in this thread. There's no acquiescence to the facts; no, "Okay, I was misinformed by a wrong by a wrong piece of information." Instead, it's a denial of reality; a childish, pigheaded refusal to accept a very simple and harmless truth.

We can opine on what the reaction from the right would be if Obama had uttered just one of the things Trump has over the course of the past year. If Obama would have said that about Lindsey Lohan---that it'd be great to bang her because she has serious mental issues... need we waste one more second of time wondering?

But the point about that is the standard. There is a high standard for everyone but Trump. The Republican establishment is unworthy because of Whatever. Hillary is unworthy because of mostly imagined things, but the standard is still there. There is no standard for Trump. It's okay when he says or does anything because he's the one that said it or did it, and therefore it's not just acceptable, but good and representative of America.

My hope is that they're just a really loud but tiny minority without the courage of their convictions who will go back to whatever they were into before this great orange gasbag flatulated itself on America's collective face.
 
Re: Trump on Lindsay Lohan in 2004: 'Deeply troubled' women are 'always the best in b

Opopanax said:
But that's his appeal to them.

"He talks just like I do."

The idea that the most powerful office on earth should be held by an intelligent person with an even temperament who's above the fray and represents what's best in America is a concept that's foreign to them.

That's why his steadfast ignorance is so appealing. "I don't know stuff either and that's why I love Trump!"

Look at the response to Snopes in this thread. There's no acquiescence to the facts; no, "Okay, I was misinformed by a wrong by a wrong piece of information." Instead, it's a denial of reality; a childish, pigheaded refusal to accept a very simple and harmless truth.

We can opine on what the reaction from the right would be if Obama had uttered just one of the things Trump has over the course of the past year. If Obama would have said that about Lindsey Lohan---that it'd be great to bang her because she has serious mental issues... need we waste one more second of time wondering?

But the point about that is the standard. There is a high standard for everyone but Trump. The Republican establishment is unworthy because of Whatever. Hillary is unworthy because of mostly imagined things, but the standard is still there. There is no standard for Trump. It's okay when he says or does anything because he's the one that said it or did it, and therefore it's not just acceptable, but good and representative of America.

My hope is that they're just a really loud but tiny minority without the courage of their convictions who will go back to whatever they were into before this great orange gasbag flatulated itself on America's collective face.
Click to expand...

Nothing you posted here is valid considering a drug addict was elected in 2008 and re-elected in 2012.

There is no higher standard. Bill Clinton destroyed forever.
 
Re: Trump on Lindsay Lohan in 2004: 'Deeply troubled' women are 'always the best in b

Opopanax said:
But that's his appeal to them.

"He talks just like I do."

The idea that the most powerful office on earth should be held by an intelligent person with an even temperament who's above the fray and represents what's best in America is a concept that's foreign to them.

That's why his steadfast ignorance is so appealing. "I don't know stuff either and that's why I love Trump!"

Look at the response to Snopes in this thread. There's no acquiescence to the facts; no, "Okay, I was misinformed by a wrong by a wrong piece of information." Instead, it's a denial of reality; a childish, pigheaded refusal to accept a very simple and harmless truth.

We can opine on what the reaction from the right would be if Obama had uttered just one of the things Trump has over the course of the past year. If Obama would have said that about Lindsey Lohan---that it'd be great to bang her because she has serious mental issues... need we waste one more second of time wondering?

But the point about that is the standard. There is a high standard for everyone but Trump. The Republican establishment is unworthy because of Whatever. Hillary is unworthy because of mostly imagined things, but the standard is still there. There is no standard for Trump. It's okay when he says or does anything because he's the one that said it or did it, and therefore it's not just acceptable, but good and representative of America.

My hope is that they're just a really loud but tiny minority without the courage of their convictions who will go back to whatever they were into before this great orange gasbag flatulated itself on America's collective face.
Click to expand...

Yeah, basically the thinking seems to be "Trump is as stupid, uncurious and crass as me, so he's gotta be alright."

Frankly, if the next President is as stupid and lazy as me, then this country is in pretty big trouble.
 
Re: Trump on Lindsay Lohan in 2004: 'Deeply troubled' women are 'always the best in b

Cardinal said:
Yeah, basically the thinking seems to be "Trump is as stupid, uncurious and crass as me, so he's gotta be alright."

Frankly, if the next President is as stupid and lazy as me, then this country is in pretty big trouble.
Click to expand...

Right? Look at the response directly above yours to my first post in this thread which accuses Obama of being a drug addict and then says Bill Clinton destroyed standards.

It makes no sense, yet is perfectly representative of millions of Trump supporters.

Back to what you said, I too want someone who's better than me in the Oval Office in as many ways as humanly possible. Trump supporters want their loud, boisterous drunk uncle to be President.
 
Re: Trump on Lindsay Lohan in 2004: 'Deeply troubled' women are 'always the best in b

coldjoint said:
You know what? All I did is look at the title and wonder who could possibly give a **** what Trump said about Lindsay Lohan in 2004? The man is human and he shows it.

Hillary should give that a try, the human stuff.
Click to expand...

Do you dismiss all sexually abusive perverts as just being "human"? Or just when they are republicans? I gotta say most humans I know don't treat or think about women the way he does.
 
Re: Trump on Lindsay Lohan in 2004: 'Deeply troubled' women are 'always the best in b

yankintx said:
Her work with Children, and there causes is proof enough, you should back up your statement, otherwise its empty partisan retoric.
Click to expand...

Children like the 12 year old rape victim, or the children who were scammed in Haiti?
 
Re: Trump on Lindsay Lohan in 2004: 'Deeply troubled' women are 'always the best in b

Opopanax said:
Right? Look at the response directly above yours to my first post in this thread which accuses Obama of being a drug addict and then says Bill Clinton destroyed standards.

It makes no sense, yet is perfectly representative of millions of Trump supporters.

Back to what you said, I too want someone who's better than me in the Oval Office in as many ways as humanly possible. Trump supporters want their loud, boisterous drunk uncle to be President.
Click to expand...

You don't know Obama is a drug addict?

He admits to taking every drug he could find.

It is funny you think Bill Clinton upheld the standards of the Presidency with what he did in the Oval Office.

You have a one sided view of these things.
 
Re: Trump on Lindsay Lohan in 2004: 'Deeply troubled' women are 'always the best in b

Kreton said:
Do you dismiss all sexually abusive perverts as just being "human"? Or just when they are republicans? I gotta say most humans I know don't treat or think about women the way he does.
Click to expand...

They are not human? You losers want terrorists to be considered human and victims why not perverts? The Left is a hypocritical cluster****.
 
Re: Trump on Lindsay Lohan in 2004: 'Deeply troubled' women are 'always the best in b

JumpinJack said:
Yet another reference to a woman only in the context of sex. That someone is "deeply troubled," in his opinion, only means something to him insofar as it relates to sex.

Most people who refer to someone else as deeply troubled, are expressing concern or are discussing why they are, or something like that.

"I've learned Bobby has cancer. Guys with cancer are great in bed. They know they're going to die soon. (giggle giggle)"

We're talking about someone who wants to be President of the United States, a dignified office if ever there was one. Someone who wants to be President for Lindsay Lohan and all other Americans, presumably.
Click to expand...

So because he happened to be talking about this woman, at this time, in reference to sexual activity, that MUST mean that is the only way he views women, ever, at any given time....

It is ignorant statements like this that make me wonder about some of your ability to use rational thinking.... OR.... most likely...
You are just looking for any and all reasons to talk **** about him and twist this into some "WOMENZZ RIGHTZZ!!!!!!111!!!one!!!!!!!" crap.

We get it, you don't like him. I don't like her.
 
Re: Trump on Lindsay Lohan in 2004: 'Deeply troubled' women are 'always the best in b

Cardinal said:
I think the larger question here is who President Clinton plans on nominating to the Supreme Court.
Click to expand...

Exactly.....

Lets focus on the issues related to why we are electing them to office in the first place, not this Reality TV garbage.

Clinton plans on nominating someone to the supreme court who will overturn previous case law that prevents the Federal government from enacting federal level firearms bans and controls.... Which is why I wouldn't vote for her.
 
Re: Trump on Lindsay Lohan in 2004: 'Deeply troubled' women are 'always the best in b

Caine said:
What does this have to do with federal government policy?

Nothing?

Moving along......
Click to expand...

The point is that a President has to lead a country of humans, and Trump sees people solely as goofy entertainment props, masturbation toys and sources for his own financial enrichment.
 
Re: Trump on Lindsay Lohan in 2004: 'Deeply troubled' women are 'always the best in b

Caine said:
Exactly.....

Lets focus on the issues related to why we are electing them to office in the first place, not this Reality TV garbage.

Clinton plans on nominating someone to the supreme court who will overturn previous case law that prevents the Federal government from enacting federal level firearms bans and controls.... Which is why I wouldn't vote for her.
Click to expand...

Oh stop it. If anybody was going to get a single molecule's worth of gun control legislation passed it would have been Obama, and he didn't do jack****.
 
Re: Trump on Lindsay Lohan in 2004: 'Deeply troubled' women are 'always the best in b

Cardinal said:
The point is that a President has to lead a country of humans, and Trump sees people solely as goofy entertainment props, masturbation toys and sources for his own financial enrichment.
Click to expand...

He said all that?

No?

Oh, thats right.... you are expecting me to view what he has done in the most negative light possible for political bashing convenience like you do.

Sorry, not going to happen.

Many of us see him as a human, who at times says dumb human things, just like the rest of us do. His every word for his entire adult life hasn't been pre-prepared and researched, and polled on for acceptance, and rehearsed.

Apparently my more recent post where I nearly commended you for wanting to be more focused on relevant policy things was a bit pre-mature.

You ARE a reality TV voter after all.
 
Re: Trump on Lindsay Lohan in 2004: 'Deeply troubled' women are 'always the best in b

Cardinal said:
Oh stop it. If anybody was going to get a single molecule's worth of gun control legislation passed it would have been Obama, and he didn't jack****.
Click to expand...

And yet...... there is a supreme court seat open. Your argument is invalid.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom