• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Catholic Group Demands Top Clinton Aide Resign over Leaked Emails

What is interesting is that is how most liberals view religion.
Their religious bigotry is amazing and some are even proud of it.

The Clinton news network is going to down play every email and not even report on all the crap Clinton has spewed over the past several months.

What is amazing is that she can spew the crap she spews about people and middle class people and say it with a straight face.
We know she hates working people we knew that already that is why she passes policies to slow and or stop prosperity.

Sure. Religion is stupid. Everyone knows that.
 
thank you for proving my point.

No worries. I am always happy to oblige on that issue. Religion is stupid.

Funny thing is you probably feel the exact same way about religions you disagree with. I am sure you believe that Wiccan or belief in Norse Gods is stupid.
 
Not going to heaven and "doomed to hell" are two different things. I don't know many evangelicals that would consider a moral person of a different faith "doomed to hell"

I understand that, which is why I clarified, "or at least they cannot be saved...."
 
As anti-religious rhetoric goes, that is easily the most vanilla demonstration we've seen over the course of the past year.

Oh, so now there are levels of bigotry....But thanks for admitting it is bigotry....
 
"WTF" said the Catholics excommunicate anyone? It is the individual that excommunicates them self with or without a ritual by anyone else.

No, a church can also excommunicate one. The LDS do.

But let's go old-school:

 
No, a church can also excommunicate one. The LDS do.

But let's go old-school:



Actually, I think that the excommunication is only confirmed and communicated by the ritual. The fact is already there.

But the movie was good.
 
I'm not surprised that Hillary would surround herself with people who mock religion, but given the fact that Latinos are largely Catholic, is it wise for the Clinton camp to view Catholics with disdain?

Thoughts?
Comments?
Catholic group demands top Clinton aide resign over leaked emails

Could you please explain what Clinton did in this that mocked religion?

And if it was not Clinton who mocked religion, who did and what exactly did they say that mocked religion?
 
We have learned how Hillary Clinton views "everyday" Americans via her own words.

What words from Clinton reveal how she views everyday Americans?
 
What words from Clinton reveal how she views everyday Americans?

Podesta wrote about it in one of his emails. You should find it so you can learn for yourself what he said about Hillary and "everyday" Americans.
 
Podesta wrote about it in one of his emails. You should find it so you can learn for yourself what he said about Hillary and "everyday" Americans.

As expected - you have no evidence to present. Telling me where the field of haystacks is and saying there might be a needle out there is intellectually dishonest in the extreme. You should stop that.
 
As expected - you have no evidence to present. Telling me where the field of haystacks is and saying there might be a needle out there is intellectually dishonest in the extreme. You should stop that.

Actually it's an admission that I understand you won't take responsibility to find out for yourself. That is your loss, and less time wasted on my part.
 
Actually it's an admission that I understand you won't take responsibility to find out for yourself. That is your loss, and less time wasted on my part.

I guess I have to treat you like you just signed up here this morning and are a stranger to what the protocols of debate are. You see, it is totally the responsibility of the persons making the claims of fact to both produce them and provide evidence for them. Alluding to their existence is not enough.

Telling me where the field of haystacks is and saying there might be a needle out there is intellectually dishonest in the extreme. You should stop that.
 
I guess I have to treat you like you just signed up here this morning and are a stranger to what the protocols of debate are. You see, it is totally the responsibility of the persons making the claims of fact to both produce them and provide evidence for them. Alluding to their existence is not enough.

Telling me where the field of haystacks is and saying there might be a needle out there is intellectually dishonest in the extreme. You should stop that.

LOL

Well, I guess I'm trying to learn how to be a liberal/socialist progressive and requiring you to do the work for me. Why aren't you willing to do the work for me?
 
LOL

Well, I guess I'm trying to learn how to be a liberal/socialist progressive and requiring you to do the work for me. Why aren't you willing to do the work for me?

Your reply is again nonsensical. I guess I have to treat you like you just signed up here this morning and are a stranger to what the protocols of debate are. You see, it is totally the responsibility of the persons making the claims of fact to both produce them and provide evidence for them. Alluding to their existence is not enough.

Telling me where the field of haystacks is and saying there might be a needle out there is intellectually dishonest in the extreme. You should stop that.
 
Your reply is again nonsensical. I guess I have to treat you like you just signed up here this morning and are a stranger to what the protocols of debate are. You see, it is totally the responsibility of the persons making the claims of fact to both produce them and provide evidence for them. Alluding to their existence is not enough.

Telling me where the field of haystacks is and saying there might be a needle out there is intellectually dishonest in the extreme. You should stop that.

I'm in need. Why won't you help me?
 
I'm in need. Why won't you help me?

What about this simple protocol of debate seems to so confuse and befuddle you? It is totally the responsibility of the persons making the claims of fact to both produce them and provide evidence for them. Alluding to their existence is not enough.
 
Back
Top Bottom