• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Al Gore to campaign for Clinton, hoping to galvanize young voters on climate change

Re: Al Gore to campaign for Clinton, hoping to galvanize young voters on climate chan

I would love to see you prove that 80% of American even heard of superstring theory, much less explain it. Your post is a joke. Please prove what you posted, it's going to be entertaining. :lamo

Sounds like something from The X Files.
 
Re: Al Gore to campaign for Clinton, hoping to galvanize young voters on climate chan

Al Gore is very popular with a lot of millennial voters
Not as popular as ManBearPig.
 
Re: Al Gore to campaign for Clinton, hoping to galvanize young voters on climate chan

More accurately, 97% of climate science papers that made an express declaration of human influence, or lack thereof, said there was human influence. If I remember the scope of that study correctly.
And yet....

New Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation.jpg

Time after time the lie is repeated. Over and over the figure has been cited. Is it even true? Of course not. Is there 'consensus'? No. What they did is cherry picked 11,994 papers of which 32.6 per cent endorsed AGW, then ignored the 67.4 per cent which stated no position on AGW, disagreed with Global Warming, or agreed that Global Warming was ongoing but that man had nothing to do with it, then focusing SOLELY ON THE 32.6% 'discovered' that 97% of the 32.6% agreed with AGW. Thats radically different than consensus = 97% of all scientists...but thats the lie that was propagated. But even THAT false finding was a lie, since they took it upon themselves to interpret the papers they accepted as endorsing AGW and follow on researchers after contacting the authors of those papers found that the authors were never contacted by the researchers AND that in many cases, Cook and others had dishonestly misrepresented their opinions.

Yeesh.

So...do we have consensus among all scientists? No. Do we at least have consensus among all CLIMATE scientists? No. What we have is a lie used to hook and reel in a bunch of eager AGW suckerfish.

In their opinion, the ends always justify the means. And people wonder why many of us do not trust the AGW 'movement'.
 
Re: Al Gore to campaign for Clinton, hoping to galvanize young voters on climate chan

:lamo

Thats you pretending it isnt the Global Warming alarmists that USE those scenarios to scare dumb-asses into swallowing their ridiculous doctrine....cute!

I'm not terribly interested in journalists' take on science, they get basically everything wrong.

My personal favorite: some researches develop a molecule that delivers hydrogen sulfide into cells, which can inhibit certain diseases and types of cancer, or something.

Headlines in multiple outlets: "Smelling farts can cure cancer."
 
Re: Al Gore to campaign for Clinton, hoping to galvanize young voters on climate chan

And yet....

View attachment 67208181

Time after time the lie is repeated. Over and over the figure has been cited. Is it even true? Of course not. Is there 'consensus'? No. What they did is cherry picked 11,994 papers of which 32.6 per cent endorsed AGW, then ignored the 67.4 per cent which stated no position on AGW, disagreed with Global Warming, or agreed that Global Warming was ongoing but that man had nothing to do with it, then focusing SOLELY ON THE 32.6% 'discovered' that 97% of the 32.6% agreed with AGW. Thats radically different than consensus = 97% of all scientists...but thats the lie that was propagated. But even THAT false finding was a lie, since they took it upon themselves to interpret the papers they accepted as endorsing AGW and follow on researchers after contacting the authors of those papers found that the authors were never contacted by the researchers AND that in many cases, Cook and others had dishonestly misrepresented their opinions.

Yeesh.

So...do we have consensus among all scientists? No. Do we at least have consensus among all CLIMATE scientists? No. What we have is a lie used to hook and reel in a bunch of eager AGW suckerfish.

In their opinion, the ends always justify the means. And people wonder why many of us do not trust the AGW 'movement'.

They excluded papers that made no effort to discuss human influence on climate, yes.

They also excluded papers on astrophysics and cancer research.
 
Re: Al Gore to campaign for Clinton, hoping to galvanize young voters on climate chan

They excluded papers that made no effort to discuss human influence on climate, yes.

They also excluded papers on astrophysics and cancer research.
Stick with your first line.

"They excluded papers that made no effort to discuss human influence on climate, yes." Absolutely. They excluded all the papers (the vast majority of them BTW) that disagreed with their premise so that they could find supportive 'consensus'. Yes Deuce...that is EXACTLY what they did. And then they lied about it in the announcement of their findings...so much so that even the President himself repeated the lie.

Hey...do you agree? Yes. Do you agree? yes. Do you agree no. Do you agree? No. Do you agree? No. Do you agree? No. Do you agree? No Do YOU agree? No. Ok...all you 'no' guys...**** off. The rest of you...

Look! All the remaining scientist that we hand picked because they agree with us agree! Kind of! Consensus!!!
 
Re: Al Gore to campaign for Clinton, hoping to galvanize young voters on climate chan

It's a sad day when someone suggests a scientific question should be resolved by a public opinion poll.

80% of Americans think superstring theory variant HO is valid. Well, that settles it. Type HE and IIA can go pound sand. Debate over.

I would love to see you prove that 80% of American even heard of superstring theory, much less explain it. Your post is a joke. Please prove what you posted, it's going to be entertaining. :lamo


I hope this is some kind of brutally subtle satire. Because, you are absolutely right that my post was a joke. Satire.

I was literally joking. But the joke had a point. I'll explain it.



The joke was this: HAHA! at anyone who attempts to suggest that a scientific question can be resolved by a general public opinion poll. The blatantly blatant satire was embodied in my invocation of various versions of string theory. The blatantly blantest blatant point being that if we change the subject from AGW to any other scientific field, especially hard physics, then I'd suspect many deniers would agree that public opinion polls don't resolve such questions.

Screen Shot 2016-10-06 at 7.08.12 PM.png

HOAX!

That looks like something from them A-rabs; I don't know those fuzzy letters. Probably a bomb recipe, Amirite?

Am.

I.

Right?
 
Re: Al Gore to campaign for Clinton, hoping to galvanize young voters on climate chan

According to the polls global warming is dead last among the concerns of the people, so it looks like to me that Gore is trying to get some life for his campaign from Clinton and not the other way around.

perhaps, but its the #1 concern of millennials, which is the whole point here... Clinton is trying to motivate that group to get to the polls.

Biggest problems in world today, according to millennials - Business Insider
 
Re: Al Gore to campaign for Clinton, hoping to galvanize young voters on climate chan

Oh yes...he caught that 'green' bug alright...

View attachment 67208146

al gore's father, " the poor country school teacher" who died a multi millionaire by becoming Armand Hammer's butt boy taught his son well in how to translate public office into becoming filthy rich
 
Re: Al Gore to campaign for Clinton, hoping to galvanize young voters on climate chan

Stick with your first line.

"They excluded papers that made no effort to discuss human influence on climate, yes." Absolutely. They excluded all the papers (the vast majority of them BTW) that disagreed with their premise so that they could find supportive 'consensus'. Yes Deuce...that is EXACTLY what they did. And then they lied about it in the announcement of their findings...so much so that even the President himself repeated the lie.

Hey...do you agree? Yes. Do you agree? yes. Do you agree no. Do you agree? No. Do you agree? No. Do you agree? No. Do you agree? No Do YOU agree? No. Ok...all you 'no' guys...**** off. The rest of you...

Look! All the remaining scientist that we hand picked because they agree with us agree! Kind of! Consensus!!!

A paper that makes no statement on AGW isn't disagreeing with AGW. That doesn't make any sense.
 
Re: Al Gore to campaign for Clinton, hoping to galvanize young voters on climate chan

A paper that makes no statement on AGW isn't disagreeing with AGW. That doesn't make any sense.
Culling through papers on climate change and only selecting those that agree with AGW as a cause makes PERFECT sense...when you are trying to claim 'consensus'.

That 97% was a lie, wasnt it? It has been constantly promoted as a lie, hasnt it?
 
Re: Al Gore to campaign for Clinton, hoping to galvanize young voters on climate chan

Culling through papers on climate change and only selecting those that agree with AGW as a cause makes PERFECT sense...when you are trying to claim 'consensus'.

That 97% was a lie, wasnt it? It has been constantly promoted as a lie, hasnt it?

If that were true, it would have been 100%
 
Re: Al Gore to campaign for Clinton, hoping to galvanize young voters on climate chan

If that were true, it would have been 100%
And yet that IS what they did, isnt it.

That 97% was a lie, wasnt it? It has been constantly promoted as a lie, hasnt it?
 
Re: Al Gore to campaign for Clinton, hoping to galvanize young voters on climate chan

And yet that IS what they did, isnt it.

That 97% was a lie, wasnt it? It has been constantly promoted as a lie, hasnt it?

Excluding papers that make no assertion regarding AGW isn't lying, no. If you misunderstood the scope of the paper, that's your problem.
 
Re: Al Gore to campaign for Clinton, hoping to galvanize young voters on climate chan

Excluding papers that make no assertion regarding AGW isn't lying, no. If you misunderstood the scope of the paper, that's your problem.

I understand their process fully well. They rigged the system to give them their 'consensus' knowing people like you would swallow it and ask for seconds.

You continue to refuse to answer the question. Why is that?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Re: Al Gore to campaign for Clinton, hoping to galvanize young voters on climate chan

Al Gore won the popular vote of the people for the presidency and still has lots of respect among millions of Americans. His message of global warming and the need for strong action should go well on college campuses.

Gore can be an effective spokesperson for Clinton if used properly.

"...if used properly..."

That's like the endless song about socialism failing because the right people weren't at the helm.

Believe me, I'm more than happy he's out there, and being used any which way. He and Dennis Kucinich would make a wonderful pair... in the Catskills.
 
Re: Al Gore to campaign for Clinton, hoping to galvanize young voters on climate chan

Al Gore is very popular with a lot of millennial voters

As they say... "who?".
"Oh! Him"?

And... I guess the far Leftist Millenials are still in college.
 
Re: Al Gore to campaign for Clinton, hoping to galvanize young voters on climate chan

"...if used properly..."

That's like the endless song about socialism failing because the right people weren't at the helm.

Believe me, I'm more than happy he's out there, and being used any which way. He and Dennis Kucinich would make a wonderful pair... in the Catskills.

His ecology message is probably welcome on college campuses.
 
Re: Al Gore to campaign for Clinton, hoping to galvanize young voters on climate chan

His ecology message is probably welcome on college campuses.

Maybe, but my bet is he has as much drawing power with young voters as Hillary has.

Which means a room of about 50 people.

Go Algore!!!
 
Re: Al Gore to campaign for Clinton, hoping to galvanize young voters on climate chan

ALGORE RETURNS



Hillary must be beyond desperate to bring this wooden, corrupt fossil into the campaign to galvanize young (ROTFLOL) voters.

I hope someone screams... Hey Algore, is your house still burning TWENTY-times the energy as the average house... Hypocrite!



From yesterday:

Oops! ROTFLOL...

AL Gore is actually one word, AlGore.

 
Back
Top Bottom