• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump Foundation ordered to stop fundraising by N.Y. attorney general’s office

All you have to do is look at the 990s. :shrug:

Given that I'm not a prosecutor or auditor, I will wait until an authority having jurisdiction actually proves he broke the law. Like I said, proof. In the mean time, I'm still not voting for him.
 
Really? Just broke the rules, huh. Seriously? The law is now "the rules?"

In the view of most of the US military, the one that endangered the entire country and the lives of US military members so that she could avoid having to disclose all of her emails under the FOIA law, was pretty bad. I don't think that I'm qualified to say which is worse, but as a former of the US military...
So yell us who was harmed by her bad choice in email usage? Your service is appreciated but it makes you no more qualified than this former US member of the military, but you sure attempted to.
 
Given that I'm not a prosecutor or auditor, I will wait until an authority having jurisdiction actually proves he broke the law. Like I said, proof. In the mean time, I'm still not voting for him.

Ok, so it's not enough to have ready access to the proof, you need a prosecutor or auditor to say it exists?
 
Ok, so it's not enough to have ready access to the proof, you need a prosecutor or auditor to say it exists?

No. I need someone that's qualified to determine if it's an illegal act and then to prove it is an illegal act in a court of law. If you prefer to prosecute with unqualified people in the press by using innuendo and rumor, then you go right ahead.
 
No. I need someone that's qualified to determine if it's an illegal act and then to prove it is an illegal act in a court of law. If you prefer to prosecute with unqualified people in the press by using innuendo and rumor, then you go right ahead.

If I have video footage of a guy shooting someone in the face in a drive-by then I don't need a parade of legal experts to tell me he's guilty. The same is true of Trump. We have the Foundation's 990s. There's no rumor or innuendo about it. We can see for ourselves that he's plainly guilty by viewing the same evidence that would be presented in a courtroom.
 
If I have video footage of a guy shooting someone in the face in a drive-by then I don't need a parade of legal experts to tell me he's guilty. The same is true of Trump. We have the Foundation's 990s. There's no rumor or innuendo about it. We can see for ourselves that he's plainly guilty.

Shooting a person in the face is obvious criminal activity. What Trump is being accused of doing is not as clear cut, and I feel you probably know that, but would rather utilize a logical fallacy known as a false equivalency to skew the truth. No parades required. Just allowing people to be granted their Constitutional Rights.
 
If I have video footage of a guy shooting someone in the face in a drive-by then I don't need a parade of legal experts to tell me he's guilty. The same is true of Trump. We have the Foundation's 990s. There's no rumor or innuendo about it. We can see for ourselves that he's plainly guilty by viewing the same evidence that would be presented in a courtroom.

But...but...has he been charged with a crime?
 
So yell us who was harmed by her bad choice in email usage? Your service is appreciated but it makes you no more qualified than this former US member of the military, but you sure attempted to.

It doesn't matter if anyone was harmed. She still broke the law.
 
I'm supposed to take your word for how that item was paid for and with what funds he used?

Nope. I think you are an adult and can check the facts yourself. Let me know how it benefits veterans when you do
 
It doesn't matter if anyone was harmed. She still broke the law.

Well you seem to believe it did and act as if she committed Treason. Now back to the topic, Trumps possible illegal activities.
 
Well you seem to believe it did and act as if she committed Treason. Now back to the topic, Trumps possible illegal activities.

She violated The Espionage Act. The law is the law.
 
She violated The Espionage Act. The law is the law.

Me thinks you are reaching on her, now with Trump we shall see, this ain't over yet gotta follow the money.
 
Me thinks you are reaching on her, now with Trump we shall see, this ain't over yet gotta follow the money.

What law did Mr. Trump break?
 
Political BS, that's only going to make the Democrat NY AG look bad, and hurt the veterans and others that the foundation was giving the money to.

Very stupid move by the NY AG.

So let me get this straight, asking a charitable foundation that failed to register properly or comply with state's law and has a founder that used it to self-deal, settle lawsuits, and buy portraits of himself without donating a penny to it since 2008 to cease and desist is political BS? And you're one to talk..
 
What law did Mr. Trump break?

Oh, possible Fraud with his so called "college", misappropriation and fraud with his foundation could be possibilities. But we shall see how that goes.
 
Oh, possible Fraud with his so called "college", misappropriation and fraud with his foundation could be possibilities. But we shall see how that goes.

How was his college fraud? If I go to Harvard and don't get a great job, does that mean Harvard is a fraud?

Basically, you don't have a clue. Right? We do know that Clinton lost--don't know where it is--6 billion dollars. Why aren't you up-n-arms over that? Sychophantism?
 
Nope. I think you are an adult and can check the facts yourself. Let me know how it benefits veterans when you do

You are an adult, and check the facts about Clinton and her breach of National Security yourself. Let me know how THAT benefits veterans and especially those still serving when you do. Some things are just more important, or at least they are to those of us that understand the actual facts of real life. I've never given Trump a pass, as most on the left have Clinton. I'm just asking for the same thing that Clinton was allowed -- to have his Constitutional rights respected and given Due Process. I'll wait for that to happen.
 
You are an adult, and check the facts about Clinton and her breach of National Security yourself. Let me know how THAT benefits veterans and especially those still serving when you do. Some things are just more important, or at least they are to those of us that understand the actual facts of real life. I've never given Trump a pass, as most on the left have Clinton. I'm just asking for the same thing that Clinton was allowed -- to have his Constitutional rights respected and given Due Process. I'll wait for that to happen.

So assuming what has been reported is true, do you accept that what he did is illegal and wrong?
 
So assuming what has been reported is true, do you accept that what he did is illegal and wrong?

If what has been reported is true, of course it's wrong. Illegal? Probably, but that's where the Due Process comes in and why I'm going to wait on that point.
 
If what has been reported is true, of course it's wrong. Illegal? Probably, but that's where the Due Process comes in and why I'm going to wait on that point.

Fair enough.

Of course, even when Clinton has been cleared with multiple investigations, it seems that plenty are ready to treat her as if she is guilty. I don't suppose that is what you mean by "due process".
 
How was his college fraud? If I go to Harvard and don't get a great job, does that mean Harvard is a fraud?

Basically, you don't have a clue. Right? We do know that Clinton lost--don't know where it is--6 billion dollars. Why aren't you up-n-arms over that? Sychophantism?

I di believe it was since the "diplomas" are pretty much worthless. I am against waste no matter who does it, seems like Trump is no better than Hillary, the topic here is Trump, something you do not seem to have a clue on.
 
I di believe it was since the "diplomas" are pretty much worthless. I am against waste no matter who does it, seems like Trump is no better than Hillary, the topic here is Trump, something you do not seem to have a clue on.

Worthless degrees are available at every college in the country. Does a degree in liberal studies guarantee a good job?
 
Worthless degrees are available at every college in the country. Does a degree in liberal studies guarantee a good job?

They will get you a better job than what his "university" will get you.
 
They will get you a better job than what his "university" will get you.

That's why we have a record number of college graduates? All colleges are a fraud and should be prosecuted, by your logic.
 
That's why we have a record number of college graduates? All colleges are a fraud and should be prosecuted, by your logic.
THAT does not make any sense based on what I stated. Let me know when you figure out the meaning of my words, oh wait.............
 
Back
Top Bottom