• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Donald Trump Attacks Hillary Clinton On Her Marriage

I think the Hillary camp is leading Donald around like a bull with a nose-ring. I think they are hoping for, and counting on, him making his holier-than-thou attempt and attack Hillary on her marriage. And it appears he is taking the bait, hook, line and sinker.


I predicted this already. I made a long post about it yesterday and how it will play out.

Re-post:

I like it but you forgot she'll have a hard time getting it out as he will butt in continuously.
 
"Hillary Clinton was married to the single greatest abuser of women in the history of politics"

He didnt say "Hillary is married to a guy that has had a lot of affairs". I'm relatively certain he means the instances of rape, sexual assault, and sexual harassment perpetrated by Bill and her entire marital history of attacking the women her husband has abused.

There was no rape or sexual assault. You're making stuff up.
 
And yours is stupid… LOL

Interesting that you just assert that, without going to the bother of the work to beat me in debate.

Are you Obama, the man himself?

Cause you sound like OBAMA.

That would be SO cool.

:ind:
 
Hillary attacked Trump because she characterizes his treatment of women as being bad.

Trump is pointing out that Hillary has done worse to women.

He's right. She has.

Is there any truth to the rumor that if Hillary wins, she will re-name the Oval Office Pantry the Oral Office?

You do realize the stories about her going after women in retaliation are hearsay right? Just like all the other lies out there that people like you swallow hook line and sinker.
 
Interesting that you just assert that, without going to the bother of the work to beat me in debate.

Are you Obama, the man himself?

Cause you sound like OBAMA.

That would be SO cool.

It would be cool to be Obama. He's someone to look up to. Definitely not an ass clown like Trump.
 
HA! that's a laugh....Demo's surely do praise their predators like Slick Willie, and Gerry Studds Remember him? Republican's on the other hand immediately demand resignation, and departure....Don't try that revision of history with me pal...

You mean like Vitter? LMAO
 
Trump does not even have a sordid relationship past. Once ex once accused him of abuse one time, and all of the women in his life support him, that is a pretty darn good track record.

Wow what planet do you live on?

And if you call being paid off support, well...
 
It would be cool to be Obama. He's someone to look up to. Definitely not an ass clown like Trump.

Now now, even asses are useful in the right spot.

Are preferential to all of the alternatives.

And no you dont want to go there.

Least your head explode.

:bomb:
 
“Hillary was an enabler, and she attacked the women who Bill Clinton mistreated afterward."

Its not about 'her marriage'. I suspect you all know that and you will be desperate to keep the rhetoric twisted.

Bill raped Juanita Broderick.
Rat response: His relationship with Monica Lewinsky was consesnual!
Bill sexually assaulted Kathleen Wiley.
Rat response: Trump has had affairs too. Besides...Monica Lewinsky was consensual.
Hillary attacked Bills victims of sexual assault and rape.
Rat Response: Hillary was just making comments ANY women would make when they found some hussy was trying to steal her man. Monica LEwinsky was consensual!

this has been the drill for 20+ years

A lot of misinformation there.

You remind me of the Taliban. They stone the wife when the man cheats on her. Makes no ****ing sense.
 
*Sigh* I really pity you....You're so deluded now you can't even tell the difference between spin, and fact.

I think you're talking to yourself again.
 
This seems like the final effort from Trump to make something big happen. Attempt to paint Bill as a sexual predator thereby taking Hillary down. It might work. Honestly, Bill has had so many alleged affairs that it wouldn't take too much convincing to make him look like a monster. The real danger with this tactic is that it could backfire in a big way and rip him to shreds.

The trouble is it's old news. Yes he was a sleaze ball. Everybody knows that. But for Trump to attempt to take the high ground and go after the wife that was cheated on is insane. The while enabling argument won't win him any sympathy from the female voters he is courting. In fact the polls are already showing he is sinking his now ship in regards that that segment of the voting population.

He can't garner blacks, minorities, and now women. There aren't enough lower educated white men out there to make it up. He's doomed and he can't shut his trap. I think we're headed for a landslide of the likes we've never seen.
 
Last edited:
Now now, even asses are useful in the right spot.

Are preferential to all of the alternatives.

And no you dont want to go there.

Least your head explode.

:bomb:

You just posted nonsense. Absolutely nonsense. And your graphic did't help either.
 
riiiiiiiiight ;-) ......don't pay attention to the words that come out of his mouth. Keep teleprompter Trump in line and you'll be just fine.

In your opinion are words more important than actions?
 
In your opinion are words more important than actions?

They're both important when running for president. Trump loses on both accounts. He just keep digging his hole deeper. He can't shut his trap.
 
“Hillary was an enabler, and she attacked the women who Bill Clinton mistreated afterward."

Its not about 'her marriage'. I suspect you all know that and you will be desperate to keep the rhetoric twisted.

Bill raped Juanita Broderick.
Rat response: His relationship with Monica Lewinsky was consesnual!
Bill sexually assaulted Kathleen Wiley.
Rat response: Trump has had affairs too. Besides...Monica Lewinsky was consensual.
Hillary attacked Bills victims of sexual assault and rape.
Rat Response: Hillary was just making comments ANY women would make when they found some hussy was trying to steal her man. Monica LEwinsky was consensual!

this has been the drill for 20+ years

If this was any other CEO that got caught with a young intern, they would be jumping all over the CEO as evil.
 
They're both important when running for president. Trump loses on both accounts. He just keep digging his hole deeper. He can't shut his trap.

Disneydude, did you change your name?
 
A lot of misinformation there.

You remind me of the Taliban. They stone the wife when the man cheats on her. Makes no ****ing sense.
:lamo

Thats ****ing pathetic dood. 'adultery' was not mentioned as the problem once. The problem is not that he has had numerous affairs. The problem is his history of rape, sexual assault, and sexual harassment and HER history of attacking the victims. And no matter how much you want to try to divert everything back to a 'consensual' affair with an intern, it will not work. You might as well sprinkle some salty on that ****burger you are willfully eating for them.
 
There was no rape or sexual assault. You're making stuff up.
Did Juanita Broderick make everything up? Did Kathleen Wiley make everything up? Did Paula Jones make everything up? Did Carolyn Moffet make everythign up? Did Sandra Allen make everything up?

Theres a while lot more and whooooooole lot of people that are apparently making things up. Its funny how down with womens causes people like you are...until the women have been assaulted by democrats.

Says a lot about you, actually.
 
Oh Trump, such an inept and easily manipulated loudmouth you are. Both Trump and Hillary have their fair share of marital improprieties, but the difference is that in the case of Hillary, she can easily repurpose them to work in her favor as a devoted wife that stood by her husband at his worst. In the case of Trump, however, the improprieties can afford no other interpretation other than that of a brazen adulterer that is proud of his inability to keep it in his pants.

If the marital improprieties of the candidates come up in the next debate, and if Hillary succeeds in painting that image, I'll have to hand it to her for the sagacity required to turn such a historical disadvantage on its head.
 
so do you have any adjectives to describe Trumps demeanor and physical appearance?
I hardly think there is a shortage of adjectives from your side describing Trump, so you needn't any help from me. Look around on site and you will find plenty, from the factual to the god awful fanciful to the downright despicable.

Choose/spew your own poison.
 
I think the Hillary camp is leading Donald around like a bull with a nose-ring. I think they are hoping for, and counting on, him making his holier-than-thou attempt and attack Hillary on her marriage. And it appears he is taking the bait, hook, line and sinker.


I predicted this already. I made a long post about it yesterday and how it will play out.

Re-post:
The Don is a quick read.

The guy didn;t become a billionaire without knowing how to fight. His style is street smart mixed with businessman survivalist.

Both individuals are accustomed to winning. He from a competitive business environment, she successfully surfing the wave of her husband's political career having the press/party hand her the nomination in the 'competitive' world of democrat politics.


He will not be a meek Mitt, that glove doesn't fit. Cat like, always lands somehow on his feet. He is not afraid to put some extra steel in his debate gloves, to hit back hard with gusto. The Clintons are undeniably target rich, Trump can hit from right or left, the upper cuts coming when Trump figures out how to successfully nullify the 'fair' moderators from assisting her.

I do not see the scenario going your vision of it. If it goes that way he will deserve to lose.

What needs be done is to keep driving unrelentingly driving down her throat that she didn't stop at just faithfully standing by her man. She was a longstanding and willing accomplice, if not mastermind, destroying/ putting behind them Bill's unavoidable stream of bimbo eruptions.

Trump may even well have had similar type dalliances. Hasn't seemed to hit the frequency/variety. For one Trump seems to have generally better taste, notice Trump has no Hillary as a marital mistake like Bill. Salient fact is we know for sure that Bill has the unseemly eruptions ... and Hildabeast has been the A team denigrating them, snuffing them out. You know, as always 'helping' the cause of women's rights.

Had she stopped at just standing by her philandering husband... many of us, even if grudgingly, would have had at minimum some sympathy/empathy for/with her. But she/they didn't stop there. Its no doubt they went to excessive lengths in their attempts, pretty successful with a willing press and a voluntarily blind liberal base to enable them beyond the real truth.

Their weakness seems to be in their brazen arrogance, they seem to know they will get away with what they do. One of the reasons they are so unlovable is this over-cockiness, pun intended, people can still smell the odor emanating despite all the cologne and perfume they apply.

Newt's was a far different time.

Against the newer Bill, the dream of the new Camelot at the time ...against a Bill with loyal wife Hillary protecting his name. Current Hill is not old or current Bill, who has, with some pretty fancy ongoing footwork, recreated himself into an almost universally likable type.

She isn't near the dancer Bill is. Her misstepping two left leaning feet, plastic smile, nails scratching, screeching down the long blackboard to the cuffs of his political coattails... is all the closer she can get.
 
Oh Trump, such an inept and easily manipulated loudmouth you are. Both Trump and Hillary have their fair share of marital improprieties, but the difference is that in the case of Hillary, she can easily repurpose them to work in her favor as a devoted wife that stood by her husband at his worst. In the case of Trump, however, the improprieties can afford no other interpretation other than that of a brazen adulterer that is proud of his inability to keep it in his pants.

If the marital improprieties of the candidates come up in the next debate, and if Hillary succeeds in painting that image, I'll have to hand it to her for the sagacity required to turn such a historical disadvantage on its head.
Don't know if they make an industrial strength paint that will successfully mask the fact, like you folks on that side keep trying to get us all to forget, that its not the marital affairs...

Each one of you here go out of your way to ignore that its the planned and purposeful, the premeditated destruction by both Bill and Hillary, of the victims of Bill's uncontrollable lust.

His, without her help resuscitating him, self destructive behavior that straddled the fence of criminal sexual assault, un-indicted [ lord, doesn't that have a familiar Clinton ring to it? ] yet too much and too explicit the smoke for there not to be fire.

That he was not going to be able to keep it in his pants nor, somewhat understandably, in the monogamous realm was a given probably from the start.

Yet it will have to be some pretty magical lipstick that will dress up that pig. Most of us out here have no desire to be that willingly, almost comically but also downright disingenuously, blind.
 
Back
Top Bottom