Harry Guerrilla
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2008
- Messages
- 28,951
- Reaction score
- 12,422
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Re: Trump Adviser, Son Post Image of Trump's 'Deplorables' Featuring White Nationalis
I can believe that.
It all depends on which parts of the interwebs you reside.
No, the problem I have it that people are still using it the original way, all the time.
Now they too will be unfairly grouped, if enough stupids start thinking this.
I'm attributing parts that I experienced.
People I've heard, from both the horrible to the tame.
"Correcting the record" isn't necessarily apologizing.
I'm fully aware, that there are actual racists in alt right and now I'm fairly certain, that the "alt right" is going to be solely associated with racist views.
I'm not defending those.
I was defending a different set who identified or at least, used to identify with said group, who did not expose racist views.
You can criticize my methods, all you want.
I tapped what I thought was a common pulse of Trump supporters.
So far, I've been more right than wrong.
I could end up totally wrong, at the end of the day though.
You're forgetting the "stealth supporter" phenomenon.
Being a vocal Trump supporter, in some places, can be dangerous to ones career and/or image.
I don't have a particular view on the Putin/Trump thing, except that he wants to associate an image that is considered strong, that's speculation.
He was pigeon holing the judge.
So that if he did not get a favorable ruling, he could claim bias.
The only people who seem to care are people who weren't going to vote for him anyway.
I like how it is characterized as an attack, when it was a response to an attack.
Talk about distorted history.
Yes, for the publicity, he should of thanked them for their sons sacrifice and went on his day.
I can believe that.
It all depends on which parts of the interwebs you reside.
No, the problem I have it that people are still using it the original way, all the time.
Now they too will be unfairly grouped, if enough stupids start thinking this.
I'm attributing parts that I experienced.
People I've heard, from both the horrible to the tame.
"Correcting the record" isn't necessarily apologizing.
I'm fully aware, that there are actual racists in alt right and now I'm fairly certain, that the "alt right" is going to be solely associated with racist views.
I'm not defending those.
I was defending a different set who identified or at least, used to identify with said group, who did not expose racist views.
You can criticize my methods, all you want.
I tapped what I thought was a common pulse of Trump supporters.
So far, I've been more right than wrong.
I could end up totally wrong, at the end of the day though.
You're forgetting the "stealth supporter" phenomenon.
Being a vocal Trump supporter, in some places, can be dangerous to ones career and/or image.
I don't have a particular view on the Putin/Trump thing, except that he wants to associate an image that is considered strong, that's speculation.
He was pigeon holing the judge.
So that if he did not get a favorable ruling, he could claim bias.
The only people who seem to care are people who weren't going to vote for him anyway.
I like how it is characterized as an attack, when it was a response to an attack.
Talk about distorted history.
Yes, for the publicity, he should of thanked them for their sons sacrifice and went on his day.
Thanks though. That did bother me. Glad to know you don't actually think so.
