sanman
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2015
- Messages
- 12,046
- Reaction score
- 4,664
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
If only the Democrats were as willing to name Islamic Radical Terrorism as a threat to national security, as compared to their immediate willingness to point fingers at the Russians to accuse them of threatening national security. It's amazing how on one issue Democrats are absolutely trying their hardest to not name the threat, but on the other issue they're very anxious to name the threat. Why the double standard?
It's just like what Trump said about Romney - ie. if that guy had spent even half the energy attacking Obama, as compared to the energy he showed in attacking Trump, then he wouldn't have lost the election.
Likewise, if the Obama Whitehouse had shown even half the forcefulness in condemning Islamic radicalism as it's shown in attacking Trump, then public confidence over Obama's stance against terrorism would be greater.
It's just like what Trump said about Romney - ie. if that guy had spent even half the energy attacking Obama, as compared to the energy he showed in attacking Trump, then he wouldn't have lost the election.
Likewise, if the Obama Whitehouse had shown even half the forcefulness in condemning Islamic radicalism as it's shown in attacking Trump, then public confidence over Obama's stance against terrorism would be greater.
Last edited: