• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Comey: ‘No reasonable prosecutor’ would have charged Clinton under ‘gross negligence’

Re: Comey: ‘No reasonable prosecutor’ would have charged Clinton under ‘gross neglige

gdgyva said:
do i think a reasonable group of people as in a grand jury would indict? maybe, maybe not

the issue some of us have is that the prosecution team refused to even let a grand jury hear it

of course, you have to have a prosecutor willing to provide the grand jury the whole story

and it seems no one in the AG office is anywhere inclined to let "the people" near the case

doesnt that seem a little strange to you? i know it does to me
Click to expand...

Especially since Slick Willy met with the AG?
 
Re: Comey: ‘No reasonable prosecutor’ would have charged Clinton under ‘gross neglige

Unitedwestand13 said:
From the article



Thoughts?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...43ec7e-43c1-11e6-88d0-6adee48be8bc_story.html
Click to expand...

I just sat through the entire Senate hearing where they questioned Corney for several hours this morning. I came away with the sense that Corney really does believe what Hillary did re her e-mails does not justify a criminal indictment. However, I got the strong sense that he believes the former Secretary of State is a blooming idiot. He didn't say so in so many words of course.

We'll have to see whether the Senate will now ask the FBI to investigate whether Hillary committed perjury to Congress based on her Senate testimony, her public statements, and her FBI interview. (I'm not holding my breath though.)
 
Re: Comey: ‘No reasonable prosecutor’ would have charged Clinton under ‘gross neglige

blackjack50 said:
Sexual relations: no.

Got a blow job: yes.
Where did I make that claim?
Posted a link.
Yea. You may claim it isn't perjury, but we both know it is. We both know his excuse was bull****. Please. Don't piss on our heads and tell us it is raining. Well...I better be careful about saying that. Old Billy might actually try that to some poor young woman.
Click to expand...

He spoke like a lawyer would. And played the courtroom game.
 
Re: Comey: ‘No reasonable prosecutor’ would have charged Clinton under ‘gross neglige

JANFU said:
He spoke like a lawyer would. And played the courtroom game.
Click to expand...

He definitely played a game.
 
Re: Comey: ‘No reasonable prosecutor’ would have charged Clinton under ‘gross neglige

ocean515 said:
You are welcome. Thanks for what you bring for sharing too. :thumbs:
Click to expand...

Complement welcomed
 
Re: Comey: ‘No reasonable prosecutor’ would have charged Clinton under ‘gross neglige

Hatuey said:
They seem like they won't stop until the Clintons are charged with something.
Click to expand...

How has that worked out for them after 20 plus years. They will not care one iota is Trump gets elected, not likely, but will continue to whine for the next 4-8 years, but then again most have learned to tune most of the whining out after the last 8 years.
 
Re: Comey: ‘No reasonable prosecutor’ would have charged Clinton under ‘gross neglige

JANFU said:
He spoke like a lawyer would. And played the courtroom game.
Click to expand...

Ah. So that is your excuse. It smells like urine, came from where urine comes from, there were NO clouds, but it still must be urine because slick Willy told you it was rain.

Sorry. But when you make a bold faced lie to the American public, after being discredited years before as a FAILED AND DISBARRED LAWYER, people have a right to question you at every turn. And if you decide to associate with him? Yea.

He told a lie, he got caught. And you wonder why people question the clintons? Really? You just openly defended his lie with "well it is game." Never mind the dozens of easily found and verified lies that old hill has told.

It pretty much leaves one question from the American public:

da104f6385c62940dfa88cfef1448449.jpg


I mean seriously? You are just going to bow down and worship her without question for these ridiculous lies? Sniper fire? Immigrants? She was a such a badass she was rejected by the marines? Lol. I love it.
 
Re: Comey: ‘No reasonable prosecutor’ would have charged Clinton under ‘gross neglige

Unitedwestand13 said:
Where and when did Hilliary commit perjury?
Click to expand...

When she said she didn't do something and it is evident that she did.
Lying under oath is perjury.
 
Casper said:
How has that worked out for them after 20 plus years. They will not care one iota is Trump gets elected, not likely, but will continue to whine for the next 4-8 years, but then again most have learned to tune most of the whining out after the last 8 years.
Click to expand...

So you are only pro Hillary because she is not trump? That's it? Seems like you have been drinking too much media juice. Propagandade
 
Re: Comey: ‘No reasonable prosecutor’ would have charged Clinton under ‘gross neglige

gdgyva said:
do i think a reasonable group of people as in a grand jury would indict? maybe, maybe not

the issue some of us have is that the prosecution team refused to even let a grand jury hear it

of course, you have to have a prosecutor willing to provide the grand jury the whole story

and it seems no one in the AG office is anywhere inclined to let "the people" near the case

doesnt that seem a little strange to you? i know it does to me
Click to expand...

Given that a federal judge ordered the entire doj including lynch to take ethics classes
Does this really surprise you how unethical these people are?

Of course ethics is set by leadership.
 
Re: Comey: ‘No reasonable prosecutor’ would have charged Clinton under ‘gross neglige

blackjack50 said:
So you are only pro Hillary because she is not trump? That's it? Seems like you have been drinking too much media juice. Propagandade
Click to expand...

Me thinks it is you that is drinking something, I do not support Hillary or Trump, neither is qualified or acceptable to hold the Office of President of the United States of America. I look a what occurs in politics from the point of view outside the Party Juice Line that so many see the world while drinking. The Cons have been going after the Clintons of stuff for over 20 years, and have spent more than 10 Million US Tax dollars on their witch hunts and they have produced exactly Nothing in all that time using all that money. Me thinks the Repubs need to stop using tax payer money to further their agenda. Do you think it is because there is some vast conspiracy by both Repubs and Dems to protect the Clintons or do you not realize that once one cries Wolf too many times people stop listening. I would have suggested that Repubs field a high quality candidate and put and end to the political career of Hillary, I see that they did the opposite so can only blame themselves for what will happen in November.
 
Re: Comey: ‘No reasonable prosecutor’ would have charged Clinton under ‘gross neglige

blackjack50 said:
Ah. So that is your excuse. It smells like urine, came from where urine comes from, there were NO clouds, but it still must be urine because slick Willy told you it was rain.

Sorry. But when you make a bold faced lie to the American public, after being discredited years before as a FAILED AND DISBARRED LAWYER, people have a right to question you at every turn. And if you decide to associate with him? Yea.

He told a lie, he got caught. And you wonder why people question the clintons? Really? You just openly defended his lie with "well it is game." Never mind the dozens of easily found and verified lies that old hill has told.

It pretty much leaves one question from the American public:

da104f6385c62940dfa88cfef1448449.jpg


I mean seriously? You are just going to bow down and worship her without question for these ridiculous lies? Sniper fire? Immigrants? She was a such a badass she was rejected by the marines? Lol. I love it.
Click to expand...

Not my excuse- Just facts.
 
Re: Comey: ‘No reasonable prosecutor’ would have charged Clinton under ‘gross neglige

JANFU said:
Not my excuse- Just facts.
Click to expand...

The fact that Clinton lied like a rug?
 
Re: Comey: ‘No reasonable prosecutor’ would have charged Clinton under ‘gross neglige

Casper said:
Me thinks it is you that is drinking something, I do not support Hillary or Trump, neither is qualified or acceptable to hold the Office of President of the United States of America. I look a what occurs in politics from the point of view outside the Party Juice Line that so many see the world while drinking. The Cons have been going after the Clintons of stuff for over 20 years, and have spent more than 10 Million US Tax dollars on their witch hunts and they have produced exactly Nothing in all that time using all that money. Me thinks the Repubs need to stop using tax payer money to further their agenda. Do you think it is because there is some vast conspiracy by both Repubs and Dems to protect the Clintons or do you not realize that once one cries Wolf too many times people stop listening. I would have suggested that Repubs field a high quality candidate and put and end to the political career of Hillary, I see that they did the opposite so can only blame themselves for what will happen in November.
Click to expand...

I call bull****. Do you honestly believe it is just a witch hunt against Hillary? Do you honestly believe she and her husband have not brought this on themselves? Both have proved their first instinct is to LIE to the people. Even on trivial things. And slick Willy is fortunate that the government let him off on a technicality. He is a disbarred lawyer. How hard is it to see that he is a scumbag? And his wife too. How about meeting with Lynch? Does that not raise your eyebrows?
 
Re: Comey: ‘No reasonable prosecutor’ would have charged Clinton under ‘gross neglige

blackjack50 said:
I call bull****. Do you honestly believe it is just a witch hunt against Hillary? Do you honestly believe she and her husband have not brought this on themselves? Both have proved their first instinct is to LIE to the people. Even on trivial things. And slick Willy is fortunate that the government let him off on a technicality. He is a disbarred lawyer. How hard is it to see that he is a scumbag? And his wife too. How about meeting with Lynch? Does that not raise your eyebrows?
Click to expand...

Yes it is, do not admit it is, that is fine, believe what you want.
No it does not, I believe what she said they talked about, you do not, your choice.
 
Re: Comey: ‘No reasonable prosecutor’ would have charged Clinton under ‘gross neglige

Casper said:
Yes it is, do not admit it is, that is fine, believe what you want.
No it does not, I believe what she said they talked about, you do not, your choice.
Click to expand...

Sad. Just blindly accepting what she states, despite the mountain evidence that she constantly misrepresents the truth, her husband does, and their complete contempt for the truth.
 
Re: Comey: ‘No reasonable prosecutor’ would have charged Clinton under ‘gross neglige

JANFU said:
Not my excuse- Just facts.
Click to expand...

It IS your excuse. The second you stick up for them as "it is just a courtroom game," it becomes your excuse.

"At this point what does it matter?"

"Sniper fire"

Need we go on? The woman is a con artist. She games the system. She is corrupt. She has been in hot water for decades. The only reason she avoids this stuff is because she isn't in the headline. One good thing about her becoming president? It will only be a matter of time till she gets impeached like her husband for lying to the American public at every turn.
 
Re: Comey: ‘No reasonable prosecutor’ would have charged Clinton under ‘gross neglige

blackjack50 said:
Sad. Just blindly accepting what she states, despite the mountain evidence that she constantly misrepresents the truth, her husband does, and their complete contempt for the truth.
Click to expand...

She is a politician, please point out the politician that have exactly the same issue to one degree or another, sad you do not see that.
 
Re: Comey: ‘No reasonable prosecutor’ would have charged Clinton under ‘gross neglige

blackjack50 said:
It IS your excuse. The second you stick up for them as "it is just a courtroom game," it becomes your excuse.

"At this point what does it matter?"

"Sniper fire"

Need we go on? The woman is a con artist. She games the system. She is corrupt. She has been in hot water for decades. The only reason she avoids this stuff is because she isn't in the headline. One good thing about her becoming president? It will only be a matter of time till she gets impeached like her husband for lying to the American public at every turn.
Click to expand...
Not defending, just how it played out.
You mistake me for an HRC supporter- She and Trump suck. I realy feel for the American people having these 2 as the only candidates.
 
Re: Comey: ‘No reasonable prosecutor’ would have charged Clinton under ‘gross neglige

Casper said:
She is a politician, please point out the politician that have exactly the same issue to one degree or another, sad you do not see that.
Click to expand...

Yes. Every federal politician is probably a criminal with pathological issues, but not many have a track record like HRC. They also aren't running for the highest office in the land.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom