• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Bowe Bergdahl to Face General Court Martial [W:318]

Three posts in a row in the same thread.

Bravo! That's some kind of gravitas.
 
Soho gator said:
Three posts in a row in the same thread.

Bravo! That's some kind of gravitas.
Click to expand...

Bravo not backing up your claims and rather just continuing to look like a clown.
 
1501001-pile-of-almonds-isolated-on-white-background.jpg
 
MolonLabe said:
Don't sweat it JANFU. I'm not even remotely interested in what Soho posts.
Click to expand...

I am not, but thanks. Many here have caught on to SH quite sometime ago.
 
MolonLabe said:
I just joined the forum. Don't get all conspiratorial.
Click to expand...

Well please don't blame anybody if it seems to them that you look suspicious.

You did not post anything introducing yourself.

And you have not put anything on your bio page.

You just jumped right into the threads as if you had been here before and got right to it.

I am always suspicious of new accounts.

They could be either recently banned old accounts or they could be sock puppet add-on's by current obnoxious members.

So I don't know either.

At any rate, IF you are for real, then WELCOME to the board.
 
Soho gator said:
that or encouraged to quit. Pretty common in large organizations where the riff raff must be culled.
Click to expand...

You've already backed off your lie, now prove that they were "encouraged to quit".
 
jmotivator said:
You've already backed off your lie, now prove that they were "encouraged to quit".
Click to expand...

Not re upping enlistments at their (the military) discretion = fired.

The scumbags notably aren't even employed by any military contractors. The army gave a clear signal about them.
 
Riveroaks said:
Well please don't blame anybody if it seems to them that you look suspicious.

You did not post anything introducing yourself.

And you have not put anything on your bio page.

You just jumped right into the threads as if you had been here before and got right to it.

I am always suspicious of new accounts.

They could be either recently banned old accounts or they could be sock puppet add-on's by current obnoxious members.

So I don't know either.

At any rate, IF you are for real, then WELCOME to the board.
Click to expand...

I never do an intro when I join a forum. I never read them myself so I just assume that most other people don't read them either.

I didn't do much of a bio because again, it's not really that deep for me. I figure other posters will get to know me by what I post. Not what I put in my bio.

Discussing politics is very easy for me so that explains the jump right in aspect.

For the record the only forum I ever got banned from was Mustang6G for daring to say that I just don't like the front end of the new Mustang.

Other than that I got suspended once from blueovalnews because the forum is moderated by a complete hypocrite who plays favorites and didn't much care for it when I called him out about it.

But as far as this forum goes. I'm new here. If some of you guys don't want to believe that, well, that's on you.
 
MolonLabe said:
I never do an intro when I join a forum. I never read them myself so I just assume that most other people don't read them either.

I didn't do much of a bio because again, it's not really that deep for me. I figure other posters will get to know me by what I post. Not what I put in my bio.

Discussing politics is very easy for me so that explains the jump right in aspect.

For the record the only forum I ever got banned from was Mustang6G for daring to say that I just don't like the front end of the new Mustang.

Other than that I got suspended once from blueovalnews because the forum is moderated by a complete hypocrite who plays favorites and didn't much care for it when I called him out about it.

But as far as this forum goes. I'm new here. If some of you guys don't want to believe that, well, that's on you.
Click to expand...

I'll take your word for it.

As an aside, what do you find so fascinating about King Leonidas' reply to Xerxes ??

My mother is Greek from Athens and she believes the Spartans were idiots for not covering the pass.
 
Riveroaks said:
I'll take your word for it.

As an aside, what do you find so fascinating about King Leonidas' reply to Xerxes ??

My mother is Greek from Athens and she believes the Spartans were idiots for not covering the pass.
Click to expand...

I think if Leonidas had had 600 men instead of 300 he would have slaughtered the Persians to the last man. Spartans were warriors and men of honor unlike the world has ever seen before or sense. I use their motto as a reminder to those who would seek to take away my firearms and my second amendment rights which I believe to be natural human rights, not just Constitutional. Every man and woman on earth has the right to defend themselves, their country and their family by deadly force if necessary. The Athenians and the Spartans have never been best of friends. lol
 
Soho gator said:
Not re upping enlistments at their (the military) discretion = fired.

The scumbags notably aren't even employed by any military contractors. The army gave a clear signal about them.
Click to expand...

So you have evidence that they wanted to re-up and were rejected? Also, is it your understanding that all members of the military go to work for military contractors when they leave service?
 
Lutherf said:
Bowe Bergdahl to Face General Court Martial - ABC News

This means that they will be going for Dishonorable Discharge as a minimum and, likely, substantial jail time. It also means that all the political posturing you heard from assorted brass over the past year was exactly that.
Click to expand...

Thing is desertion can end up with anything from a dishonerable discharge, to the death penalty. Most likely if found guilty he will never recieve the death penalty, even though it is allowed it has mostly been used in the most extreme cases.

IF convicted he will either recieve a dishonerable discharge, jail time or both.
 
Riveroaks said:
FMW you are being accused by others of "verbosity."

Verbosity is a fallacy in debate.

You should read about it in my separate thread covering all the fallacies.

Then you should cease and desist.
Click to expand...

Verbosity is not a fallacy in a debate, nor has it ever been, you are thinking of argumentum verbosin, which means intentionally making arguments so complex no one can follow them.
 
starcitizen said:
Jihadists are not an ideology they are a global movement that can be defeated the same as communists and fascists before them.
Click to expand...
 We are not fighting an ideology we are fighting the people who adhere to an ideology.
Click to expand...



There are still lots of Nazis and Communists on this planet.

20 or 30 years from now we'll still be fighting jihadists.
 
Soho gator said:
Not re upping enlistments at their (the military) discretion = fired.

The scumbags notably aren't even employed by any military contractors. The army gave a clear signal about them.
Click to expand...

I get that you don't really know anything about this or most of the other topics you make things up about on this site but just for future reference the majority of people who join the military serve their initial enlistment and get out.

We get that you will do whatever you can to defend Obama but making up lies about other people just to do so is rather low when for you.
 
Moderator's Warning:
Everyone needs to knock off the personal crap and stick to the topic.
 
beerftw said:
Verbosity is not a fallacy in a debate, nor has it ever been, you are thinking of argumentum verbosin, which means intentionally making arguments so complex no one can follow them.
Click to expand...

hence, the lack of familiarity with that particular fallacy


it is significant that the general who made the recommendation to abrams recommended that no time be served
don't think the death penalty will be an option

An Army officer is recommending that Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl face a lower-level court martial and be spared the possibility of jail time for leaving his post in Afghanistan, his lawyer said Saturday.
Click to expand...
Attorney: Army officer recommends no jail time for Bergdahl
 
Last edited:
braindrain said:
I get that you don't really know anything about this or most of the other topics you make things up about on this site but just for future reference the majority of people who join the military serve their initial enlistment and get out.

.
Click to expand...

Exactly. I just had to laugh at those posts as the comments of someone who has no clue what he's talking about with respect to military life. So let me get this right. These guys served their initial enlistment, got out, and didn't go to work for a military contractor. Congratulations you just described about 85% of the people who join the military to include myself.
 
justabubba said:
hence, the lack of familiarity with that particular fallacy


it is significant that the general who made the recommendation to abrams recommended that no time be served
don't think the death penalty will be an option


Attorney: Army officer recommends no jail time for Bergdahl
Click to expand...

I already figured it would be very slim he would get the death penalty, I just pointed out they can. The death penalty in recent wars has been reserved for the most extreme cases.
 
I don't always engage in Thread Necromancy,
But when i do, it's because i have an UPDATE:


Bowe Bergdahl expected to plead guilty in connection with his disappearance in Afghanistan
Oct. 12

The plea is expected at a pretrial hearing at Fort Bragg, N.C., where proceedings in Bergdahl’s case have slowly unfolded since he was arraigned there in December 2015. The decision was first reported as likely by the Associated Press last week, and the Army disclosed Thursday that a plea is expected as it began registering media to cover the hearing.

Bergdahl’s civilian attorney, Eugene Fidell, declined to comment Thursday in a brief phone conversation. If the plea is entered as expected, sentencing probably will occur Oct. 23, when Bergdahl’s court-martial trial was scheduled to begin.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ection-with-his-disappearance-in-afghanistan/
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom