1. What part of the "presidents" quote do you think he didn't mean? Just because a political figurehead of an area viewed all the lines of Protestantism and moral racism does not negate the fact that the CSA had an amendment that basically prohibited the transportation of slaves into the region. Have you read Lincolns inaugural address? He says plain and clearly that he is in favor of southern slavery and wants to raise taxes
The same constitution protected the institution of slavery, and extended it into all territories, protected the right of anyone to bring slaves into any state, etc.
And Lincoln's address makes clear that his view is the constitution allows slavery, and that he has no intention to interfere with it in the states, but that the issue of slavery in the territories must be resolved like all other matters through the majority, that the minority cannot dictate matters left unresolved in the Constitution to the minority. And I didn't see him pledging to raise taxes in that first inaugural. If I missed it, please quote the relevant section.
Your history is pretty selective.....
2. Why do you think the tenth amendment delegates powers to the states? Why do you think treason in the constitution is defined as anyone who levy a war against the states? They aren't saying anyone who levies war against Washington, D.C. Or opposes he federal government they are saying if someone attacks Georgia from South Carolina in a military manner they are commit in treason
This is what it says about treason - "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort." Seems to imply a collective "them" as in one or all of them. Don't see how this supports your point.
3. All men are created equal and sovereign states are in the Declaration of Independence, which by definition was the colonies seceding from England... Why would they hinder that ability amongst states within the republic?
If they anticipated that, why not write the provision into the Constitution? Surely you don't think the Feds could purchase a territory, admit them into the U.S. and the next year the territory purchased by blood and/or treasure could simply decide - "Hey, Thanks GUYS! We'd like to be our own country!"
4. England and all of Europe freed slavery without force. If the north uplifted the 50% tariff we would of seen the end of slavery without any military and the loss of 600,000 people.
OK, and how does the government pay for itself?
5. There is absolutely nothing I can possibly do to force people to not think a certain way. A majority of people are now geared at this anti white sentiment in San Francisco and I hear it all the time. I've had people yell at me and call me names and have been threatened with violence multiple times simply because I am Yugoslavian. meaning I hold absolutely no cultural or historical affinity to the slave owners or any American racist group, in fact when my grand parents got here they were targeted by the KKK. I know what it's like to be a target of racism, do I think the government has a duty to force people not to think a certain way? Absolutely not.
I don't think it
can FORCE people to think a certain way, and it certainly has no duty to try. What is should do is protect civil and human rights.
But I talk about Jim Crow and you give me this? I have no idea how it's responsive to any point I've raised.
6. Have you heard any of the propaganda of why racists are racists? It's because they hate how gov subsidizes the African American community simply because they are African American creates racial division. There is more racism in the United States then any country in Europe at this present time.
No idea what your point is. Before the great society, the South had an unbroken period lasting CENTURIES of oppression of blacks without much of that "subsidizing" from whites.
7.
Barry Goldwater’s Religion and Political Views | The Hollowverse He was raised episcopalian but was still a son of a Jewish immigrant...
Grandson of Jewish immigrants, and, he was wealthy and white and so sacrificed NOTHING to allow rampant discrimination and segregation of poor blacks in the South, public and private. When it costs you nothing, it's easy to reject the CRA because of public accommodation laws that don't affect you, yours, your friends, business associates, etc. If the Jim Crow laws targeted Jews and his grandfather was a frequent victim of discrimination in his home in Alabama, and he had the guts to tell his father - "I love you but will vote to allow continued, rampant public and private discrimination against Jews like you because of freedom!" I'm impressed.