I posted a quote from a historian earlier in the thread that stated the exact opposite of this:
As Woodson put it in 1924's Free Negro Owners of Slaves in the United States in 1830, "The census records show that the majority of the Negro owners of slaves were such from the point of view of philanthropy. In many instances the husband purchased the wife or vice versa … Slaves of Negroes were in some cases the children of a free father who had purchased his wife. If he did not thereafter emancipate the mother, as so many such husbands failed to do, his own children were born his slaves and were thus reported to the numerators."
Moreover, Woodson explains, "Benevolent Negroes often purchased slaves to make their lot easier by granting them their freedom for a nominal sum, or by permitting them to work it out on liberal terms." In other words, these black slave-owners, the clear majority, cleverly used the system of slavery to protect their loved ones. That's the good news.
In other words, I am basing my opinion on a historian's words so not reading history is not the issue for me. Like I said in my last post to you, however, we can agree to disagree and if you think I'm wrong, I'll live. And, quite frankly, I've had discussions with several people in this thread and not one of them has been as personally rude as you have. And because I'm not in the mood for it, I'll let you have the last word.