• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Country’s First Gay Divorce Firm Opens In Philadelphia

No, accommodation laws apply to all public accommodations and protect every individual
I suppose existing, traditional marriage laws were not discriminatory either, because they allowed every individual to marry. :roll:
 
Much of this had little to do with marriage anyhow. More about getting their way.

Yeah, humans like to "get their way".
 
I suppose existing, traditional marriage laws were not discriminatory either, because they allowed every individual to marry. :roll:

You sound very confused. Marriage is not a public accommodation.
 
No idea if there's precedent or not. Even if there is it would be relatively small I'd think given the timeframes. Now that it will go national, that may change.

Well after eleven years I believe that if any significant issues unique to same sex marriages were going to pop up, they would have done so by now. There's no rational reason to believe there'll be any problems.
 
Is there precedent for any of this? Same sex marriage just came to the remaining thirteen holdouts, otherwise there has been ssm since 2004.

Gay divorce is likely never discussed in most media. You know. cause they're gay.
 
Not to unnecessarily parse words, but it is required here.

The Pope used the term 'separation', which in the context of Catholicism is highly different than 'divorce'.

This has been the Church's position for centuries - it does not imply divorce or re-marriage.

I'm not Catholic but, the media seems to think it's about divorce.
 
Gotta wonder to what extent this has to do with gay divorce actually being different and to what extent this is about marketing the firm towards a demographic group that typically has more disposabe income.

Well if you market to a specific group, you're a racist. Or something....
 
Well after eleven years I believe that if any significant issues unique to same sex marriages were going to pop up, they would have done so by now. There's no rational reason to believe there'll be any problems.

Generally no I don't think that's accurate. In the 11 years how many gay divorces have there been and how many have involved both biological and non-biological parents? Now compare that to what is in store with all 50 states and the next 11 years.
 
Generally no I don't think that's accurate. In the 11 years how many gay divorces have there been and how many have involved both biological and non-biological parents? Now compare that to what is in store with all 50 states and the next 11 years.

Married couples adopt and divorce. A biological parent will divorce and remarry, and then they too divorce. This is old stuff.

The fact that in eleven years you can't find a single instance of complication unique to gay marriage demonstrates this.
 
I'm a little confused. What exactly is a gay divorce lawyer and how would a gay divorce be different than a straight divorce? What does the lawyer think the gays are going to battle over? Glitter and douche?
 
Married couples adopt and divorce. A biological parent will divorce and remarry, and then they too divorce. This is old stuff.

The fact that in eleven years you can't find a single instance of complication unique to gay marriage demonstrates this.

I just find exception in your "it's all been done" when applying it to something as new as gay marriage and that it's all been done in 10 years. Logically and mathematically that doesn't hold water but you're free to try and justify it however it makes you feel comfortable.
 
I just find exception in your "it's all been done" when applying it to something as new as gay marriage and that it's all been done in 10 years. Logically and mathematically that doesn't hold water but you're free to try and justify it however it makes you feel comfortable.

Well, keep an ear to the ground for the rest of us. We'll all sleep better knowing you're on the job.
 
Well, keep an ear to the ground for the rest of us. We'll all sleep better knowing you're on the job.

How sad you think I'm on the job. :lamo
 
You learned a new word!


:applaud

Maybe you should learn what it is to keep relatively on the topic of a thread. Might improve your style a bit. Though we would miss the drug addled diatribes that make no sense.
 
I don't see how a gay divorce would be any different from a heterosexual one.

Well..if its two males the determination of custody of any kids will definitely NOT go to the woman for once. :D
 
Back
Top Bottom