• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Colorado Court Rules Use of Public Funds for Private Schools Is Unconstitutional

Somerville

DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 29, 2012
Messages
17,865
Reaction score
8,344
Location
On an island. Not that one!
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Socialist
Another win for the constitutionalists; in this instance the constitution of the state

Colorado Court Rules Use of Public Funds for Private Schools Is Unconstitutional

DENVER — Colorado’s highest court on Monday struck down a voucher program that allowed parents in a conservative suburban school district to use taxpayer dollars to send their children to private schools.

The split decision to throw out the voucher program in Douglas County, Colorado’s third-largest school district, was a blow to conservative education advocates and those who want to redefine public education to funnel tax dollars directly to families who then choose the type of schooling they want for their children.

“This stark constitutional provision makes one thing clear,” Colorado’s chief justice, Nancy E. Rice, wrote in the court’s opinion. “A school district may not aid religious schools.”

This will be an interesting fight. The proponents of the voucher program say they will file an appeal with the SCOTUS as in 2002, it ruled in Zelman v. Simons-Harris that vouchers could be used to pay for tuition at religious schools.
 
Another win for the constitutionalists; in this instance the constitution of the state
Not at all.
I am opposed to such a process, but if that is the ruling they are going to make then they can very well stop taking those funds from those specific tax payers to start with.
 
Back
Top Bottom