• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama's approval rating grows following memorable week

Quit fart responding.
 
WSUwarrior said:
Yet your side attacks the 2A and dont even want people to have magazines over 10 rounds, 8 round, 7 rounds, or whatever some idiot decided was appropriate this week.
Click to expand...

It's not really that simple. I'm the one Conservative is accusing and I gladly accept the name liberal, yet I have pistols with 6, 8,9 and 15 round magazines. I don't object to the 2A at all, in fact I reload and shoot frequently. All liberals don't feel the same way about everything you say they feel. I do wonder why you brought this up on a thread about Obama's approval rating. Surely it wasn't to deflect the topic, was it?
 
scatt said:
Quit fart responding.
Click to expand...

that makes no sense. But you again have exposed your own tactics and intellectual inability to engage in debate.
 
scatt said:
Your post makes no sense?
Click to expand...

And that makes no sense as a question or a statement. But you again have exposed your own tactics and intellectual inability to engage in debate.

Are you now going to tell us what CONSENT has to do with your post on the health care law or will this be another post from you where you look for a hidey hole to just disappear and hope we forget what you said?
 
I agree your initial fart fetish and comment make no sense.
 
scatt said:
I agree your initial fart fetish and comment make no sense.
Click to expand...

Apparently you do not even know the meaning of the word FETISH as it goes far far far beyond one mention. You seem to have a great deal of trouble with the actual meaning of words and how to use them.

So this is about you being able to do two things
1- run and hide from your CONSENT comments and never have to stand tall and explain them,
2- get in the last word

Very well - take the last word.
 
Thanks for quitting, legal question asker.

I also like the Agent J numbering. Haha.
 
scatt said:
Thanks for quitting, legal question asker.

I also like the Agent J numbering. Haha.
Click to expand...


Neither of those statements make any sense either as nobody asked you a legal question nor are you in any position to give legal opinions with any credibility.
 
You asked a legal question specifically, and then said you asked a legal question.
 
scatt said:
You asked a legal question specifically, and then said you asked a legal question.
Click to expand...

Which legal question was that and in what post was that?

And why in the world would I or anyone ask you for a legal opinion about anything?

Prediction: you will continue to play these stupid ridiculous games and not answer any of those questions.
 
scatt said:
The one you said was a law question.
Click to expand...

Never did say that. You are delusional. I am flushing this toilet with you in it. Take your intellectual dishonesty and your grade school games somewhere else.
 
Take your toilet fetish and hike.

And you did say it.
 
haymarket said:
post 328 quotes me telling you I am NOT asking for a legal opinion but only your personal opinion as to what CONSENT has to do with the health care law.

post 328 offers NO explanation from you in any way shape or from telling us about why you introduced the idea of CONSENT into the discussion.
Click to expand...

I think it's safe to conclude that you've put "scatt" into a full retreat, a rout. All she seems to want to do now is fade away as if she never was here.
 
Conservative said:
As stated, I have posted the link to the debt by day, you ignored it and made up your own numbers. Now you post Kaiser numbers which really are meaningless. First 15% of the entitlement state of California creates more than a million more Californians uninsured but the real issue is you don't breakdown the numbers to see why they are so high. That is headline reading and is what people like you do. Name for me a successful Progressive country in the world today and define success? Yours seem to be on how much the people get FROM their govt. and not the opportunities to create personal wealth from that govt.
Click to expand...

To the wrong day, yes. The stats you used for CA uninsured are even more bogus. California has 9 million more people than TX so putting up a number doesn't give anything like a perspective of a problem. Turns out that 15% of the CA population is the same number of people as the 20% uninsured in TX--6 million. So, I've tripped up your little deceptions every time and you keep coming back for more humiliation. I really like this game. Let's keep playing. Your turn.
 
iguanaman said:
It appears that all the victories last week have boosted Obama's approval rating to 50% for the 1st time since 2013. I guess more of us are proud to be an American.
Click to expand...

And the importance of public approval rating is? Zero!

Ratings change as the wind blows. One week they may be up, the next week down. Ratings have absolutely no value except to give pundits on either side of an issue (or in this case a public figure) something to talk about.

I have never cared about a public approval ratings. In fact, the only approval rating that matters to me is my own, which depends on my assessment of an issue or person on a case by case basis developed over time .
 
digitusmedius said:
Actual results based on false parameters. I won't call it lying-by-statistics because I'm sure you just regurgitate these false stats that you feed on from the rightwing pukefunnel.
Click to expand...

You are so right, Treasury data which is the bank account of the United States provides false data just like I am sure your bank provides you with false data. Thanks for pointing that out.
 
digitusmedius said:
To the wrong day, yes. The stats you used for CA uninsured are even more bogus. California has 9 million more people than TX so putting up a number doesn't give anything like a perspective of a problem. Turns out that 15% of the CA population is the same number of people as the 20% uninsured in TX--6 million. So, I've tripped up your little deceptions every time and you keep coming back for more humiliation. I really like this game. Let's keep playing. Your turn.
Click to expand...

The stats I use don't provide you with the answer you want but the reality is it doesn't matter how many but why? How many are eligible for Medicaid or other State programs. You want a federal mandate because you cannot compete and do not understand personal responsibility. You are a legend in your own mind and that is where it will stay
 
digitusmedius said:
The idea that you think you've refuted anything is hilarious. All you've done is post one bogus set of stats after another, get called on it, and double down on the bogusness.
Click to expand...

Yep, Treasury data is wrong and obviously your opinions are right.
 
digitusmedius said:
Great work but we can bring all the facts to these people and it will not even make a dent in their concrete encased brains.
Click to expand...

Yep, Treasury data is wrong as is basic civics. Bush was something else, not getting a spending plan approved, signing 4 of the 12 spending bills and created a 1.7 trillion dollar deficit according to you. That is liberal math and liberal logic.
 
digitusmedius said:
The idea that you think you've refuted anything is hilarious. All you've done is post one bogus set of stats after another, get called on it, and double down on the bogusness.
Click to expand...

The idea that you call Treasury data bogus is quite telling about just how little credibility you have. Like it or not that is what we pay debt service on so if you have a problem with Treasury give them a call and straighten them out.
 
Captain Adverse said:
And the importance of public approval rating is? Zero!

Ratings change as the wind blows. One week they may be up, the next week down. Ratings have absolutely no value except to give pundits on either side of an issue (or in this case a public figure) something to talk about.

I have never cared about a public approval ratings. In fact, the only approval rating that matters to me is my own, which depends on my assessment of an issue or person on a case by case basis developed over time .
Click to expand...

You sound too much like Dick Cheney for my taste. There is validity and a purpose to approval ratings. Especially in the partisan poisoned atmosphere we are in now.
 
Conservative said:
I find it quite telling that you go from thread to thread with the same support for Obama using the same charts that you don't understand Why so much passion for liberalism? Are you ever going to think with something other than your heart? You buy CBO numbers when they support your point of view and ignore them when they don't. Do you understand what CBO provides? Projections based upon assumptions. If the assumptions are wrong so are the projections. If they are given the assumption that tax cuts are an expense that is what they use. Most people understand that keeping more of what they earn isn't an expense to the govt. nor does it reduce revenue.

Do you understand that a budget is a guideline, not a spending bill? Because you budget for an item do you have to spend it? Obama took office in January 2009. He had a Bush spending plan that WASN'T approved by Congress. Bush operated on continuing resolutions based upon 2008 numbers thus couldn't have created the deficit you blame him for. Nor did the tax cuts which generated economic activity cause those deficits? Seems that liberals believe that without the tax cuts economic activity would have been the same but cannot prove that nor justify that sentiment based upon the components of GDP.

Then why is it you post data and run from the posts that refute it?
Click to expand...

I showed you the opinion of CATO. Why don't you take it up with them? Perhaps they will retract their post. :2razz:
 
iguanaman said:
I showed you the opinion of CATO. Why don't you take it up with them? Perhaps they will retract their post. :2razz:
Click to expand...


Do you know what an opinion is? How about thinking for a change? There was no budget for 2009 because Congress failed to pass it. 2009 spending was limited to Continuing resolutions based upon 2008 spending and 2008 spending would never have created the deficit you blame on Bush. Bush was in office for only 4 months of fiscal year 2009 and would be responsible only for that deficit. Treasury data shows what the deficit was when Bush left office and I posted the link to that deficit which of course you ignored. You also ignored that 350 billion of the 2009 deficit was due to TARP, a loan which was repaid and you ignored what Obama did with that repayment.

Now as for the revenue loss, you want to blame Bush but ignore Obama's Stimulus and its failure. Had Obama not created the stimulus I would agree with the revenue loss but his prediction and stimulus was supposed to create shovel ready jobs to keep unemployment from exceeding 8% and that would have prevented the lost revenue. You want to ignore that.

Now I await for you to respond to the facts I just posted, not opinion, FACT.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom