Yet your side attacks the 2A and dont even want people to have magazines over 10 rounds, 8 round, 7 rounds, or whatever some idiot decided was appropriate this week.
Quit fart responding.
that makes no sense.
Your post makes no sense?
I agree your initial fart fetish and comment make no sense.
Thanks for quitting, legal question asker.
I also like the Agent J numbering. Haha.
You asked a legal question specifically, and then said you asked a legal question.
Which legal question was that and in what post was that?
The one you said was a law question.
post 328 quotes me telling you I am NOT asking for a legal opinion but only your personal opinion as to what CONSENT has to do with the health care law.
post 328 offers NO explanation from you in any way shape or from telling us about why you introduced the idea of CONSENT into the discussion.
As stated, I have posted the link to the debt by day, you ignored it and made up your own numbers. Now you post Kaiser numbers which really are meaningless. First 15% of the entitlement state of California creates more than a million more Californians uninsured but the real issue is you don't breakdown the numbers to see why they are so high. That is headline reading and is what people like you do. Name for me a successful Progressive country in the world today and define success? Yours seem to be on how much the people get FROM their govt. and not the opportunities to create personal wealth from that govt.
It appears that all the victories last week have boosted Obama's approval rating to 50% for the 1st time since 2013. I guess more of us are proud to be an American.
Actual results based on false parameters. I won't call it lying-by-statistics because I'm sure you just regurgitate these false stats that you feed on from the rightwing pukefunnel.
To the wrong day, yes. The stats you used for CA uninsured are even more bogus. California has 9 million more people than TX so putting up a number doesn't give anything like a perspective of a problem. Turns out that 15% of the CA population is the same number of people as the 20% uninsured in TX--6 million. So, I've tripped up your little deceptions every time and you keep coming back for more humiliation. I really like this game. Let's keep playing. Your turn.
The idea that you think you've refuted anything is hilarious. All you've done is post one bogus set of stats after another, get called on it, and double down on the bogusness.
Great work but we can bring all the facts to these people and it will not even make a dent in their concrete encased brains.
The idea that you think you've refuted anything is hilarious. All you've done is post one bogus set of stats after another, get called on it, and double down on the bogusness.
And the importance of public approval rating is? Zero!
Ratings change as the wind blows. One week they may be up, the next week down. Ratings have absolutely no value except to give pundits on either side of an issue (or in this case a public figure) something to talk about.
I have never cared about a public approval ratings. In fact, the only approval rating that matters to me is my own, which depends on my assessment of an issue or person on a case by case basis developed over time .
I find it quite telling that you go from thread to thread with the same support for Obama using the same charts that you don't understand Why so much passion for liberalism? Are you ever going to think with something other than your heart? You buy CBO numbers when they support your point of view and ignore them when they don't. Do you understand what CBO provides? Projections based upon assumptions. If the assumptions are wrong so are the projections. If they are given the assumption that tax cuts are an expense that is what they use. Most people understand that keeping more of what they earn isn't an expense to the govt. nor does it reduce revenue.
Do you understand that a budget is a guideline, not a spending bill? Because you budget for an item do you have to spend it? Obama took office in January 2009. He had a Bush spending plan that WASN'T approved by Congress. Bush operated on continuing resolutions based upon 2008 numbers thus couldn't have created the deficit you blame him for. Nor did the tax cuts which generated economic activity cause those deficits? Seems that liberals believe that without the tax cuts economic activity would have been the same but cannot prove that nor justify that sentiment based upon the components of GDP.
Then why is it you post data and run from the posts that refute it?
I showed you the opinion of CATO. Why don't you take it up with them? Perhaps they will retract their post. :2razz: