- Joined
- Mar 2, 2013
- Messages
- 24,819
- Reaction score
- 8,344
- Location
- Northern New Jersey
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
What you mean is that you knew there were at least 4 members of the Court that do not agree with your personal interpretation of the Constitution. Just as most of us knew that at least two/three of the Justices had an interpretation of the Constitution that matched yours, which was extremely limited because they support states' rights over individual rights.
No, you are in error. My personal view does not enter into it. There should be no party affiliation detectable in a Supreme Court Justice, they should all be able to read the Constitution and do what it says.
And it's not that the four liberals can't do that, it's that they won't do it. The Constitution is in conflict with their liberal agenda, so they ignore it. Has nothing to do with me. Today's democrats have strayed so far left, and far from what this country was founded on, that the Constitution isn't even in their ballpark.